Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project





Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Evil Nerds and Their Self-Indulgent Fantasies

Hughes Praises Art Caplan in Discover Magazine

George’s notes on Cyborg Buddha presentation at Convergence

Convergence08: Opening panel on AI

Weather Balloons Gone Wild

comments

Kripa on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 11 16)

Kripa on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 11 16)

Pope Salmon the Lesser Mungojelly on 'Libertopian Doublethink on the Singularity' (2008 11 16)

steve on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 11 15)

Find the truth on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 11 15)




ieet forums

Sam G: Transhumanism (1)

jake: Irresitible (1)

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)



"Drill for oil? You mean drill into the ground to try and find oil? You're crazy." -- Drillers who Edwin L. Drake tried to enlist to his project to drill for oil in 1859.





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



Human Enhancement Technologies
and Human Rights


May 26-28, 2006

Stanford University Law School, Stanford, California

Schedule - Speakers - Download program
Download the poster


Sponsored by: Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Co-Sponsors: Stanford Program in Ethics in Society, GeneForum, ExtraLife

Martin Gunderson Ph.D.

Department of Philosophy, Macalester College


Martin Gunderson is a professor of philosophy at Macalester College where he teaches courses on ethics and bioethics.  He received his PhD from Cornell University and his JD from the University of Minnesota.  He has published articles on the right to die, informed consent, freedom of speech and privacy.  He is currently working on the ethics of genetic engineering.

Genetic Engineering and the Consent of Future Generations

The debate over whether germ-line genetic engineering is justified on the basis of the consent or presumed consent of future generations is mired in philosophical confusion and best avoided by relying instead on the value that justifies the consent requirement.  While most bioethicists ground the requirement on individual autonomy, I argue that it is best grounded on respect for moral agency—the ability to reflect on moral considerations and conform one’s behavior to those considerations.  Genetic engineering, including engineering for the purpose of enhancement, is justified insofar as it respects the value we place on moral autonomy.

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376