Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism

Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment

Future Evolution of Virtual Worlds as Communication Environments


comments

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'No Consensus on Future of Nation-State' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'Occult America' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'What takes the place of the nation-state?' (Mar 11, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Human Enhancement Technologies
and Human Rights


May 26-28, 2006

Stanford University Law School, Stanford, California

Schedule - Speakers - Download program
Download the poster


Sponsored by: Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Co-Sponsors: Stanford Program in Ethics in Society, GeneForum, ExtraLife

Patrick Hopkins Ph.D.

Assoc. Prof. of Philosophy, Millsaps College


Patrick D. Hopkins teaches philosophy and science and technology studies at Millsaps College in Mississippi.  He is the author of numerous articles on bioethics, technology studies, and gender studies.  He is editor of Sex/Machine:  Readings in Culture, Gender, and Technology  (Indiana University Press, 1999).

Why Human Rights are a Problem for Enhancement

The concept of human rights poses a problem for enhancement.  The basic concept of a “human right” or “natural right” developed historically as a secular implication of natural law theory and is conceptually founded on the idea that rights flow from basic human nature and human needs.  Given that human rights thinking is about fulfilling specifically human capacities, it will be extremely difficult for such a framework to accommodate any “right” to move beyond those capacities.  I’ll explain this problem and offer three possible ways to deal with it.

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376