"Every daring attempt to make a great change in existing conditions, every lofty vision of new possibilities for the human race, has been labeled Utopian." --Emma Goldman
Post-Doctoral Fellow. Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics
Eric Racine, PhD, is a postdoctoral fellow with the Neuroethics Imaging Group at the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics. His current research focuses on the public understanding of neuroscience as well as on ethical issues in the clinical application of neurological sciences.
Two moral tests for enhancement
I propose two moral tests to approach the ethics of enhancement based on two complementing concepts of morality: moral acceptability and moral praiseworthiness. The moral acceptability test requires that enhancement technology fulfill scientific (e.g., risk assessment), ethical (e.g., consent), social (e.g., health coverage) and regulatory criteria (e.g., approval mechanisms). The moral praiseworthiness test entails considerations on the broader desirability of enhancement. Answers to the moral tests are discussed according to three moral-political philosophies: conservatism (morally unacceptable/morally praiseworthy), liberalism (morally acceptable/morally praiseworthy; and moderate liberalism (potentially morally acceptable/debatable praiseworthiness). I argue for moderate liberalism and discuss its implications for researcher responsibility and public policy.
IEET Blog |
email list |
newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.
Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT
06106 USA
Email: director @ ieet.org phone:
860-297-2376