Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Reverse Engineering the Human Brain to Achieve AI

On Surveillance and Privacy

2010 Advancing Substrate-Independent Minds Conference

Visualizing Global Population Growth

Rethinking Nanotechnology

We All Live in a Virtual World

Crowd-Viewing the Moon: September 18

The Conversion of a Noted Ostrich

Resilience Science

IEET is Rocking the Intertubes


comments

jim moore on 'Reverse Engineering the Human Brain to Achieve AI' (Sep 8, 2010)

Dave on 'We All Live in a Virtual World' (Sep 8, 2010)

postfuturist on 'Will you live to see the 22nd century?' (Sep 7, 2010)

postfuturist on 'Can you see ahead 90 years?' (Sep 7, 2010)

Valkyrie Ice on 'On Surveillance and Privacy' (Sep 7, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Human Enhancement Technologies
and Human Rights


May 26-28, 2006

Stanford University Law School, Stanford, California

Schedule - Speakers - Download program
Download the poster


Sponsored by: Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Co-Sponsors: Stanford Program in Ethics in Society, GeneForum, ExtraLife

Eric Racine Ph.D.

Post-Doctoral Fellow. Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics


Eric Racine, PhD, is a postdoctoral fellow with the Neuroethics Imaging Group at the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics. His current research focuses on the public understanding of neuroscience as well as on ethical issues in the clinical application of neurological sciences.

Two moral tests for enhancement

I propose two moral tests to approach the ethics of enhancement based on two complementing concepts of morality: moral acceptability and moral praiseworthiness. The moral acceptability test requires that enhancement technology fulfill scientific (e.g., risk assessment), ethical (e.g., consent), social (e.g., health coverage) and regulatory criteria (e.g., approval mechanisms). The moral praiseworthiness test entails considerations on the broader desirability of enhancement. Answers to the moral tests are discussed according to three moral-political philosophies: conservatism (morally unacceptable/morally praiseworthy), liberalism (morally acceptable/morally praiseworthy; and moderate liberalism (potentially morally acceptable/debatable praiseworthiness). I argue for moderate liberalism and discuss its implications for researcher responsibility and public policy.

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376