Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Bitcoin and Science: DNA is the Original Decentralized System

Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion

Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014

Transhumanism: A Glimpse into the Future of Humanity

Brain, Mind, and the Structure of Reality

How America’s Obsession With Bad Birth Control Hurts and Even Kills Women


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

CygnusX1 on 'Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion' (Nov 24, 2014)

Leah Carr on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

David Wood on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion' (Nov 23, 2014)

Omar Immortalist Gatti on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion' (Nov 23, 2014)

hume on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Why Running Simulations May Mean the End is Near
Nov 3, 2014
(20763) Hits
(15) Comments

Does Religion Cause More Harm than Good? Brits Say Yes. Here’s Why They May be Right.
Nov 18, 2014
(19299) Hits
(1) Comments

2040’s America will be like 1840’s Britain, with robots?
Oct 26, 2014
(14548) Hits
(33) Comments

Decentralized Money: Bitcoin 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0
Nov 10, 2014
(8637) Hits
(1) Comments



Comment on this entry

Is there a Case for Robot Slaves?


John Danaher


Philosophical Disquisitions

April 23, 2013

Right now it’s Sunday afternoon. There is large pile of washed, but as yet un-ironed clothes on a seat in my living room. I know the ironing needs to be done, and I’ve tried to motivate myself to do it. Honestly. The ironing board is out, as is the iron, I have lots of interesting things I could watch or listen to while I do the ironing, and I have plenty of free time in which to do it. But instead I’m in my office writing this blog post. Why?


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by John Niman  on  04/23  at  11:26 AM

Two thoughts, I guess:

Hard determinism aside, what would be the point? Is there some benefit to be realized by person-robot-slaves that isn’t available with non-person-robot-slaves in the morally thick sense of the word?

The second point is more of a meta-point. Assuming that we created other person-robots, it’s a good bet that they would frown upon a class of their people being created for slavery, even if that slavery made the slaves happy. I suspect that humans would do the same if, say, we genetically engineered a slave class of humans that responded to their bondage in the way you suggest.

The act of creation says something about us, I think, that may be even more relevant than the desires of the slave-people-robots. It also strikes me as a good way to edge closer to those existential risks some people are concerned about with AI.





Posted by John Danaher  on  04/23  at  04:15 PM

What would be the point? Maybe none, but maybe a person-robot would have the intelligence and flexibility to respond to human needs in a way that non-person-robot slaves could not. Peterson alludes to this in his article by discussing the advantages of programming robot slaves with the general desire to please and satisfy humans, not (say) the specific desire to do the ironing. Of course, this could indeed edge us closer to AI risk concerns.






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376