Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

Mining Space

Design Outside the Box

Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World

Are You There, Dog? It’s Me, Gordon.

Where Next for the Space Program?


comments

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 20, 2010)

Dale McCarty on 'Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment' (Mar 19, 2010)

S on 'No More Libertarians' (Mar 19, 2010)

Tony Bateson on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)

bensmyson on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Comment on this entry

The future of chess


George Dvorsky

George Dvorsky


Sentient Developments
December 08, 2006

Now that the RAG Tournament featuring Vladmir Kramnik and Deep Fritz has concluded with the machine emerging victorious, it’s time for some contemplation about the current state of chess and its future.

... Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  12/10  at  12:22 AM

The best chess playing software is not Fritz but Rybka is , see http://web.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/list.htm
(not including Hydra, which runs on a super computer). I would enjoy a human-computer match, even if the computer wins all games, because the QUALITY of the match will be high. (The problem is that the losing grandmaster would not enjoy it that much.) Giving the computer less time would RUIN the high quality match. Then it would be a match like any other grandmaster against grandmaster match. I rather give a pawn advantage to the human player (and dont decrease the time), and see a high quality match.



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  12/10  at  06:16 AM

Deep Fritz 10 the best chess program entity? lol, nice one. Please Mr. Dvorsky make ur homework next time. On all rating lists Rybka in number one. Doesn't matter on which hardware it runs, running on a quad core it even surpases an elo over 3100 ! Hydra would so get owned.

See:
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/

http://www.computerschach.de/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=222

http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40 Rating List/40_40 BestVersion/rangliste.html

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

Mining Space

Design Outside the Box

Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World

Are You There, Dog? It’s Me, Gordon.

Where Next for the Space Program?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376