Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
We Are Borg

We are the Borg… And That is a Good Thing

Are You a Facebook Addict?

How IEET Could Influence Governmental Policy

The Dark Side of Technology

Mind Uploading, Vitology, and Crystal Minds

Sustainable to Evolvable: an introduction

There’s Nothing Natural About Dying

Who, or what, is a person? Speciesism and Substrate Chauvinism

Does Transhumanism Create New Social Relations?


ieet books

Manna: Two Visions of Humanity’s Future
Author
by Marshall Brain

The Astrobiological Landscape: Philosophical Foundations of the Study of Cosmic Life
by Milan M. Ćirković

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

Intomorrow on 'Musings On Robot Sex Dolls and Companions' (May 22, 2012)

Intomorrow on 'Why Humanists Need to Make the Shift to Post-Atheism' (May 22, 2012)

Stefan Pernar on 'Why Humanists Need to Make the Shift to Post-Atheism' (May 22, 2012)

CygnusX1 on 'We are the Borg... And That is a Good Thing' (May 22, 2012)

CygnusX1 on 'We are the Borg... And That is a Good Thing' (May 22, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv


Comment on this entry

Why I think Pistorius should not be allowed to compete at the Olympics


George Dvorsky


Sentient Developments

May 19, 2008

Shocking, you say? How could I, an unabashed proponent of human enhancement, be opposed to seeing disabled athlete Oscar Pistorius compete at the Olympic Games?


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by Stu  on  05/20  at  12:05 AM

I was pretty surprised by this ruling.  Distance running seems like an area where a well-designed blade would give a huge advantage.  Extremely low weight with good springback and the effort required by the athlete could be made quite low compared with an able-bodied runner.  If the prosthetics could be designed to give no advantage I would agree with the ruling, but they are not.  I develop composite parts for a living (not for this application), and you can really tailor their properties for a given application.





Posted by damndirtypandas  on  05/20  at  06:12 PM

Trying to avoid the mess that including Pistorius will cause is the wrong strategy for a better future. Given your belief that Pistorius may indeed be the future, it is essential that we include those such as him in high profile athletic events. The Olympics are that event. I would presume that many of those who read your opinions have heard of Thomas Hughes. It is one aspect of Mr. Hughes’ ideas about technological momentum have relevance to this issue: The sooner we act to shape technologies the more chance we have to effect their development. Once a new technology has matured and been integrated into a culture it is very difficult to change the way that it is used and the way that people think about that technology. The time is now to shape the way that enhancement technologies are used. That shaping can only happen if rules, laws, and public awareness combine to push the development of technologies in directions that are beneficial to humankind. Without integration into the Olympics, integration that happens not due to years of neglect and an understanding that come too late but through active engagement,  the shape of our technological future will be determined by politicians exploiting our fear and the vagaries of market forces. There may be other venues, but none as high profile as the Olympics. The Olympics are not-amateur sports and they are already subject to various forms of enhancement. This is a good chance to have and open discussion about athletics, enhancements, and a future that we help to create rather than merely react to.  It may be messy. But sports and politics are always messy. Otherwise, the lament “Ah, if it was only like it was back when….” wouldn’t be so commonplace in politics and sports.





Posted by Andy Miah  on  05/21  at  01:04 PM

oh you better believe i’ve got a comment! coming soon. wink





Page 1 of 1 pages




Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376