About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project

Catastrophic Risks Convergence08



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

The bumpy ride hits toytown

How the Keating scandal worked

All distant problems are not created equally

Psychiatry and Freedom

Lesbionic Woman, a Technoprogressive Cyborg

comments

gregorylent on 'Technological versus Subjective Acceleration' (2008 10 06)

Alexa on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 10 06)

Cancer Survivor on 'DIY Cancer Therapy: Should dying people be allowed to experiment?' (2008 10 04)

Faucets on 'Hope for human nature' (2008 10 04)

Tawnya Atwell on 'Transhumanist theology' (2008 10 03)




ieet forums

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)



"Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess."
Oscar Wilde





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



Comment on this entry

Why I think Pistorius should not be allowed to compete at the Olympics


George Dvorsky

George Dvorsky


Sentient Developments
May 19, 2008

Shocking, you say? How could I, an unabashed proponent of human enhancement, be opposed to seeing disabled athlete Oscar Pistorius compete at the Olympic Games?

... Complete entry


COMMENTS

Posted by  on  05/19  at  11:05 PM

I was pretty surprised by this ruling. Distance running seems like an area where a well-designed blade would give a huge advantage. Extremely low weight with good springback and the effort required by the athlete could be made quite low compared with an able-bodied runner. If the prosthetics could be designed to give no advantage I would agree with the ruling, but they are not. I develop composite parts for a living (not for this application), and you can really tailor their properties for a given application.

Posted by  on  05/20  at  05:12 PM

Trying to avoid the mess that including Pistorius will cause is the wrong strategy for a better future. Given your belief that Pistorius may indeed be the future, it is essential that we include those such as him in high profile athletic events. The Olympics are that event. I would presume that many of those who read your opinions have heard of Thomas Hughes. It is one aspect of Mr. Hughes' ideas about technological momentum have relevance to this issue: The sooner we act to shape technologies the more chance we have to effect their development. Once a new technology has matured and been integrated into a culture it is very difficult to change the way that it is used and the way that people think about that technology. The time is now to shape the way that enhancement technologies are used. That shaping can only happen if rules, laws, and public awareness combine to push the development of technologies in directions that are beneficial to humankind. Without integration into the Olympics, integration that happens not due to years of neglect and an understanding that come too late but through active engagement, the shape of our technological future will be determined by politicians exploiting our fear and the vagaries of market forces. There may be other venues, but none as high profile as the Olympics. The Olympics are not-amateur sports and they are already subject to various forms of enhancement. This is a good chance to have and open discussion about athletics, enhancements, and a future that we help to create rather than merely react to. It may be messy. But sports and politics are always messy. Otherwise, the lament "Ah, if it was only like it was back when...." wouldn't be so commonplace in politics and sports.

Posted by  on  05/21  at  12:04 PM

oh you better believe i've got a comment! coming soon. wink

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

The bumpy ride hits toytown

How the Keating scandal worked

All distant problems are not created equally

Lesbionic Woman, a Technoprogressive Cyborg

What We Could Do With A Trillion Dollars

Giulio Presents Nano to the EuroScience Community

No Money Down

The Erotic of the Machine

Mike chats with the Naval War College

Emergence - IEET News for October 2008

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376