Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism

Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment

Future Evolution of Virtual Worlds as Communication Environments


comments

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'No Consensus on Future of Nation-State' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'Occult America' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'What takes the place of the nation-state?' (Mar 11, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Comment on this entry

Gregory Stock v. Dan Callahan on Healthy Life Extension




April 07, 2007

Debate between Gregory Stock and Daniel Callahan, which was moderated by Aubrey de Grey, at the Edmonton Aging Symposium which took place March 30-31, 2007.

... Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  05/26  at  03:38 AM

Professor Stock,
Isn't the stance against research regarding therapeutic cloning hypocritical?
The accusations against cloning include:
1. Cloning involves the destruction of a human embryo.
2. Cloning using animal embryos could produce maladies in their subjects (cells in therapeutic).
3. It could cause temptations for the investigation of reproductive cloning.
However, as you said, these arguments aren't viable because of a third factor, and the perspective that this third factor incites.
This third factor is the inevitability of cloning research in foreign countries.
Because of this third factor, the deductions of these prior arguments are reversed.
If it is true that cloning inflicts unethical infringements upon its subjects, then an lack of involvement in the progression of cloning technology would result in a slower rate of eradication of imperfected, immoral techniques.
Cloning is inevitable is foreign countries, regardless of US legislation, and therefore remaining evasive of cloning research is hypocritical considering that preventing the situation is not an option, and that the only way that the previous arguments now apply is in the activity of making cloning safer.
I don't know how the US would go about arranging such a project, but the sacrifice of releasing all scientific information to the public would be the only way (that comes to mind) that would prevent others from engaging in risky cloning research after the technical answers are found.

Could you PLEASE argue? I'm so interested, and I could possibly pursue this area of science. Some inspiration would help with morale.

Soren Jensen,
Freshman: University of Oregon

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism

Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment

Future Evolution of Virtual Worlds as Communication Environments

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376