Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, With Limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype


comments

veronica on 'Morality, With Limits' (Mar 21, 2010)

Marianne Waldow on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

Mike Treder on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Comment on this entry

Jamais on Metaversal Singularity




April 07, 2008

“Jamais Cascio, a futurist writer, gives four possible scenarios for how the increasing integration of technology into our lives will unfold. These scenarios are the the combination of values on two variables: whether technology is used to augment or simulate reality, and whether it is externally focused or looking inside a person. These scenarios are not inherently good or bad but will be shaped by the process used to create them.

Since all technology is a product of its creators, even the first intelligent machines will be biased toward the interests and beliefs of those who make it. For a globally significant event like the Singularity, we need to be sure that the process that leads to it includes input from all of the stakeholders that will be affected by it. These diverse interests can’t be slapped on at the end, but rather need to be brought in early in the process. Democracy is messy, but participation is more important than efficiency.

As part of his recommendation that we should be working as hard on global inclusion as on the creation of an artificial general intelligence, Jamais makes a few recommendations. All development should be based on trust, honesty, and transparency. Controls should be in place on access to personal information. And lastly, open access to information makes the risks associated with all of these scenarios more manageable. The interference of the many is better than the secrecy of the few.”

... Complete entry


COMMENTS

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, With Limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376