Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Fifteen Minutes into the Future

Love’s Labour Lost: An act of desperation leads to a bad law

Health Care Good, System Bad

A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State


comments

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

Sedicious on 'Health Care Good, System Bad' (Mar 11, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?' (Mar 11, 2010)

Dave Studeman on 'Health Care Good, System Bad' (Mar 11, 2010)

veronica on 'Are atheists and liberals more "intelligent"?' (Mar 11, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Comment on this entry

How to Redesign our Communities for the Internet Age


Edward Miller

Edward Miller


Sentient Developments
July 03, 2009

(IEET intern Edward Miller is guest blogging at Sentient Developments this month.) There is a long list of crises that we need to face and I won’t waste time boring you by listing them. As our brightest minds admit they were wrong, I hope that I can say, without qualification, that big changes in our thinking are required. Unfortunately, we haven’t made that “Change” even though we now have some new faces in power, and a bunch of old faces out of business or in prison.

... Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  07/03  at  11:01 PM

I've been working on the Reprap project for over three years now.

While you notice that...

"We are too busy answering phones, producing ad campaigns, and writing paperwork."

I wonder whether you have actually been working on anything substantive to bring around the changes you think are proper or have you restricted yourself to just "writing paperwork" at the situation?



Posted by EmbraceUnity  on  07/04  at  01:31 PM

Hello Forrest,

Thanks so much for your work on RepRap. I'm a secret admirer of yours... actually not so secret since we've spoken on IRC.

I actually am working on building a RepRap which I will be donating to Factor e Farm. If only my surface mounting equipment which I ordered from MakerBot would show up.

http://openfarmtech.org/weblog/?p=652

Of course, even if I were a complete hypocrite, all of my arguments must stand on their own merit.

Don't worry though, until such time as I am able to start or join a resilient community, I will be doing things much more hypocritical than writing paperwork.

For example, writing software for the very people whom I claim are destroying the world by patenting genetic code.

Of course I do very strongly believe in this cause, and recognize my own personal responsibility in helping create change. Anthony Giddens's idea of the Duality of Structure is what really brought that home for me in a systems theoretic perspective.

I am now a vegan and spend nearly all of my free time working towards, donating to, writing about, and promoting this cause. Hopefully RepRap and projects like it afford me the opportunity to donating an increasing share of my time to these activities, as opposed to work.

Half of all jobs currently are either harmful or irrelevant, and half of the rest can already be done better by robots. Unfortunately, we are too stupid on a societal level to organize accordingly and thus require self-replicating projects like RepRap before we can reach a post-scarcity future.



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  07/07  at  11:10 PM

See another IEEE post for an interesting counterpoint to this article:
http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/mijic20090707/

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

Fifteen Minutes into the Future

Love’s Labour Lost: An act of desperation leads to a bad law

Health Care Good, System Bad

A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376