Purpose of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

IEET Launching Annual Fundraiser

Transpolitica book launch – video recording

Review of VRLA Expo 2015

The Genetics and Neuroscience of Torture

Support the Progressive Caucus Budget

Transhumanist Party membership open


ieet books

Anticipating Tomorrow’s Politics
Author
Ed. David Wood


comments

Peter Wicks on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 28, 2015)

instamatic on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 27, 2015)

Peter Wicks on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 27, 2015)

Peter Kinnon on 'Today’s Robot Films Reflect Popular Fears Concerning Artificial Intelligence' (Mar 26, 2015)

instamatic on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 25, 2015)

David Brin on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 24, 2015)

David Brin on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 24, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


IEET Launching Annual Fundraiser
Mar 18, 2015
(3084) Hits
(0) Comments

The nanobots are coming back
Mar 10, 2015
(7367) Hits
(0) Comments

The Moral Philosophy of Transhumanism
Mar 1, 2015
(7270) Hits
(3) Comments

Posthumanisms: A Carnapian Experiment
Mar 19, 2015
(5602) Hits
(4) Comments



Comment on this entry

Why Lance Armstrong’s Doping Doesn’t Matter


John Niman


http://boydfuturist.wordpress.com/

January 20, 2013

Manny Ramirez. Mark McGwire. Barry Bonds. Baseball is no stranger to superstars using steroids. Sprinter Ben Johnson was disqualified from an Olympic victory decades ago. More likely than not, every sport has players who use ‘performance enhancing drugs’ – it’s just that the player’s performance is not generally enhanced to superstar status. Now Lance Armstrong has admitted to doping, and once again the world is shocked.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by SHaGGGz  on  01/21  at  01:20 AM

Let me engage in some diabolical advocacy for a minute.

Maybe imposing vague, barely meaningful rules delineating the “natural” from the “unnatural” could be a way for sports to produce something of actual use to technological progress: the endless cycle of finding new ways of enhancing, having them be discovered, banned, and the cycle repeating provides a self-sustaining way for us to exhaust the enhancement possibility space in this domain.

If enhancement is legal, then eventually some method will be found that is “good enough” and the costs of finding a potentially better method are outweighed by the loss of abandoning the current method. Thus, we could stagnate at a local maximum, failing to reach a global one.

At the other extreme, if any and all enhancements are allowed then the inherent absurdity in the sporting pursuit is put in stark, comical display. At some point, “people” that are indistinguishable from contemporary human-automobile systems will participate in races, or be shot out of (“slough off”) cannons, etc.





Posted by John Niman  on  01/21  at  01:32 PM

I see where you’re going, but I think allowing enhancements would do more than banning them to push technological progress.

I’m not sure there is such a thing as ‘good enough’ in competitive sports. If you’re not #1, it’s not good enough. People will continuously push for better results, furthering technology in the process.





Posted by SHaGGGz  on  01/21  at  05:23 PM

But all sorts of other elements could creep into the equation. Maybe a consensus chemical emerges, becomes a corporate sponsor and provides incentives to continue using it, maybe even raising penalties for using non-approved ones.





Posted by John Niman  on  01/21  at  06:01 PM

Maybe. But I expect there will be competition among chemical makers to vie for the ‘consensus chemical’ status (much like, say, Gatorade and Power Aid). Endorsement deals are highly likely, and particular athletes may be held to non-compete clauses, but I doubt they’d gain the sort of stranglehold over the sport that I think you mean.

Have we seen that with any other non-doping enhancers?






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376