Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies


The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

A robot that runs and swims like a salamander

Top Three Strategies for Avoiding an Existential Risk

The Cosmos and the Brain - a Great Week for Science

Phil Torres publishes book on Existential Risks

Riccardo Campa will be speaking at Vienna conference

Stefan Sorgner interviewed by Deutschlandradio Kultur


ieet books

Keywords for Environmental Studies
Author
eds. Joni Adamson, William A. Gleason, David N. Pellow


comments

almostvoid on 'Daniel Dennett: In Defense of Robotic Consciousness' (Feb 13, 2016)

almostvoid on 'The Super-Shulgin Academy: A Singularity I Can Believe In' (Feb 13, 2016)

almostvoid on 'How Science Can Make Us Immortal' (Feb 13, 2016)

DidierC on 'Radical Life Extension can be Developed Quickly for the Mainstream: Interview with Didier Coeurnelle' (Feb 11, 2016)

spud100 on 'The Super-Shulgin Academy: A Singularity I Can Believe In' (Feb 11, 2016)

randomname on '"McMindfulness": is Buddhism contaminated by capitalism?" - interview with Terry Hyland' (Feb 10, 2016)

Giulio Prisco on 'The Small Mammal Brain Preservation Prize Has Been Won' (Feb 10, 2016)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Basic Income Guarantee will allow us to move up the Maslow Pyramid - interview with Gerd Leonhard
Feb 7, 2016
(13413) Hits
(0) Comments

Becoming the First Transhuman: A Call For The Right Stuff
Jan 17, 2016
(7493) Hits
(2) Comments

“McMindfulness”: is Buddhism contaminated by capitalism?” - interview with Terry Hyland
Feb 6, 2016
(6665) Hits
(3) Comments

The one percent discovers transhumanism: Davos 2016
Feb 6, 2016
(6039) Hits
(1) Comments



Comment on this entry

The Crusade for a Cultured Alternative to Animal Meat: An Interview with Nicholas Genovese, PhD PETA


Kris Notaro


Ethical Technology

October 05, 2011

A cruelty-free, cultured meat is on the horizon that will help save a large percentage of the 27 billion animals slaughtered each year for food.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by feol  on  10/06  at  07:08 PM

Nice interview! You compared environmental impacts and costs between in vitro meat and the current harm-and-kill meat. But how does in vitro compare to vegetarian food in terms of nutritional content, production efficiency, cost and resource and environmental impact?





Posted by feol  on  10/08  at  05:14 AM

Nick: thanks for the reply.

“In terms of costs, cultured meat will be at least as competitive as vegetarian meat analogs if it can be priced within the range of conventional meat products. Vegetarian meat analogs, in general, tend to be more expensive than their conventional meat equivalents.”

The real comparison point is the costs and negative impacts of these two alternative in high volume scenarios. I had the impression that non-animal analog costs are mostly due to low scale of production. The ingredient costs must be extremely low compared to animal based products. Much more soy is likely used as feed in the process to produce the average meat burger compared to the average soy burger.

So what’s you take on that: if we assume great global demand and so great production volumes for either product, which one of the two (soy meats vs in vitro meats) would then have the upper hand?

“While an individual may personally choose to adopt a vegetarian diet, this strategy falls short on a broader, global scale to reduce environmental impacts.”

I accept a moral rights view for humans and animals so the environmental impact is of secondary importance. I worry somewhat that the in vitro message will crowd out the pro veg messages.





Posted by PeterW  on  10/11  at  10:58 AM

Thanks Nick this symposium looks very promising.





Posted by Christian Munthe  on  10/16  at  04:18 AM

Nice and informative interview, but one things gets a bit overstated. It is difficult to say that in vitro meat (IVM) diet and production will in fact save any of those animals currently tortured and killed in the meat industry. This since the effect of IVM being taken up on a broad basis would mostly mean that most of these animals would never come to exist in the first place. This does not imply, of course, that there are no good animal welfare arguments for IVM - there are (in terms of reduced suffering). But the argument should not be overstated, lest it risks to backfire.






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @ ieet.org