Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

America’s best-kept sex secret: lots of us don’t want it

Living Machines 2015

Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?

Vita-More, Rothblatt, Hughes @ Juniata H+ Conference

Will Transhumanism Lead to Greater Freedom?

The Yuck Factor — What Planned Parenthood Smears, Homophobia, & Middle School Have in Common


ieet books

Envisioning Politics 2.0
Author
David Wood and Alexander Karran eds.


comments

Kris Notaro on 'Danaher Publishes Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility' (Jul 29, 2015)

Peter Wicks on 'Zoltan Istvan's "Teleological Egocentric Functionalism": An approach to viable politics?' (Jul 29, 2015)

hume on 'Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?' (Jul 29, 2015)

hume on 'Will Transhumanism Lead to Greater Freedom?' (Jul 29, 2015)

Peter Wicks on 'Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?' (Jul 29, 2015)

spud100 on 'Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?' (Jul 29, 2015)

spud100 on 'Will Transhumanism Lead to Greater Freedom?' (Jul 29, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


If We Can Achieve Gay Marriage and Legal Pot, We Can Fix Climate Change Too
Jul 18, 2015
(24529) Hits
(1) Comments

Transhumanism: there are [at least] ten different philosophical categories; which one(s) are you?
Jul 8, 2015
(9099) Hits
(12) Comments

Robosapiens – merging with machines will improve humanity at an exponential rate
Jul 7, 2015
(8240) Hits
(1) Comments

Transhumanism – The Final Religion?
Jul 16, 2015
(8176) Hits
(5) Comments



Comment on this entry

Humanity becomes technology


Dick Pelletier


Ethical Technology

January 05, 2013

Humanity’s merge with its technology, which began shortly after the taming of fire, is still happening today. Many predict that the fine-tuning of our DNA-based biology through stem cell and genetic research will spark a powerful nanotech revolution that promises to redesign and rebuild our bodies and the environment, pushing the limits of today’s understanding of life and the world we live in.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by SHaGGGz  on  01/05  at  09:28 PM

Augmenting or replacing our flesh with artificial nanomaterials will not automagically eliminate concerns over sickness, accidents, or unwanted death. The circumstances for these will change, along with opening up whole new vistas for our fellow cybermonkeys to try to take our electrofood.





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  01/06  at  08:01 AM

@SHaGGGz,

I see a more positive future unfolding. Do I view events with more optimism? Yes I do.





Posted by b.  on  01/07  at  12:17 PM

I appreciate the first sentence which clearly shows humanities relationship to technology as long and continuous. Still, I don’t think it goes far enough. Saying that “Humanity Becomes Technology” implies it has not happened yet, which seems to conflict with the first sentence. “Humanity Becoming Technology” could be better, but sets up an artificial dichotomy between humanity and technology, which I think is false. There is no humanity if there is no technology (of course I’m agreeing with you that fire is a technology, and I would argue so is language), and there is no human-centred technology if there is no humanity. (There is non-human technology, as in non-human animals using tools optimized for specific tasks.) It has been argued that our very biological evolution has already been shaped by our technology.

For example: We are bipedal, but in order to be bipedal we need to have narrow pelvises, if we have narrow pelvises we have to deliver infants that are not developed enough to survive on their own (can’t even hold onto their mothers like infant monkeys). We can only survive as a species if our infants survive, so we must carry and protect them. How can we do that? Invent the sling to hold our infants without interfering with gathering and moving. Thus our evolution is already strictly tied to our technology. We would not have made it this far without our technology, nor would we be the biological creatures we are today.

I don’t think the division between us and technology is tenable, we are hopelessly integrated into our technology, and perhaps we have been so for as long as we have aware of ourselves as human (or longer). I don’t think any of these discussions can really move forward without taking the unity of technology and humanity as a starting point.





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  01/07  at  02:08 PM

@B.,

Very well said.






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376