Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe to: Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Blog feeds Twitter IEET Wiki



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

“Existence” | Talks at Google

LeWeb’13 Paris - Google Hangout

We Need a Carbon Tax!

Back to the future in the Metaverse

Dvorsky, Bostrom @ Moogfest 2014

Does radical enhancement threaten our sense of self?


ieet books

Between Ape and Artilect: Conversations with Pioneers of AGI and Other Transformative Technologies
Author
by Ben Goertzel ed.


comments

Renaissance Nerd on 'Will sex workers be replaced by robots? (A Precis)' (Apr 23, 2014)

Frank Glover on 'Study Gerontology! This Frontier Provides Hope for the Future' (Apr 21, 2014)

instamatic on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 20, 2014)

rmk948 on 'War Is Good for Us, Dumb New Book Claims' (Apr 20, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Technological Growth and Unemployment:  A Global Scenario Analysis

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


The Singularity Is Further Than It Appears
Mar 27, 2014
(15385) Hits
(8) Comments

Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Mar 30, 2014
(12307) Hits
(3) Comments

Will sex workers be replaced by robots? (A Precis)
Apr 18, 2014
(9816) Hits
(1) Comments

Quest for immortality spurs breakthroughs in human-machine merge
Apr 6, 2014
(6616) Hits
(1) Comments



Comment on this entry

Kardashev Civilizations: Star Trek-like world in our future


Dick Pelletier


Ethical Technology

February 05, 2013

Imagine if you could enjoy an exotic vacation billions of light years from Earth; or travel back in time to observe the dinosaurs in their violent world; or hop into a parallel universe where another you is living a better life than you; and you could swap places if you like.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by rmk948  on  02/05  at  02:20 PM

If I visit another self in a parallel universe who is living a better life than mine, what incentive would he have to switch places?





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  02/05  at  04:19 PM

@rmk948,

By the time universe hopping technology arrives; probably when we Earthlings reach Type III Civilization status in about 1,000 years or so; our minds may not use anything like today’s reasoning, but who knows? Your other you may know something that you don’t.

Accurately predicting the future this far in advance is impossible. I guess we need to rely on science fiction for the answers.

Comments welcome.





Posted by Christian Corralejo  on  02/05  at  08:00 PM

@ Dick Pelletier

I think you evaded rmk948’s question rather than answered it.





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  02/05  at  08:10 PM

@Christian Corralejo,

Yes, I did evade his question. Armed only with today’s 2013 mushy biological intelligence, I cannot even imagine how the human mind may operate in year 3000.





Posted by Christian Corralejo  on  02/05  at  10:04 PM

With that same “mushy biological intelligence” (you guys really under credit the brain) you’re automatically assuming that reason would somehow radically change in just 1000 years.  Look, we’ve been around for about 200,000 years and the general process of reasoning hasn’t really seemed to have change much.  Correct me if I’m wrong and if you have valid sources to support that notion, because transhumanist bias won’t cut it (no offense, really).





Posted by Intomorrow  on  02/06  at  12:08 AM

“Look, we’ve been around for about 200,000 years and the general process of reasoning hasn’t really seemed to have change much.”


Seemed? you mean to write reasoning has not changed much. So what do we have to lose by de-animalising?





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  02/06  at  08:58 AM

@ Christian Corralejo,

I see the future advancing exponentially. Let’s just agree to disagree.





Posted by Christian Corralejo  on  02/06  at  10:36 AM

@ Dick Pelleteir

Fair enough

@ Intomorrow

That’s not my point but I dropping it for now.





Posted by Taiwanlight  on  02/09  at  03:57 AM

Going back to the original question, why would anyone have to switch lives? Maybe the one with the least satisfactory life could just stay with his counterform in the better universe? Or just try again in another universe?

Logic, boys and girls, logic. (Yes, I know I’m probably going to regret this comment! But let’s try and keep each other as logical as humans can, eh?)





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  02/09  at  08:26 AM

When enhanced minds become available (minds that process iinformation millions of times faster than today’s mushy biological brains); our reasoning power may be as different from 2013 humans as we are from our cave-dweller ancestors.

In addition, how can we possibly imagine the differences in civilizations grown in parallel worlds?

The possibilities are great to ponder though.





Posted by Christian Corralejo  on  02/09  at  10:57 AM

“our reasoning power may be as different from 2013 humans as we are from our cave-dweller ancestors.”

I don’t think you’d find as much difference between 2013 humans and our “cave-dwelling ancestors” when it comes to reasoning.  Sure we know more but we still use general logic and reason.  On top of that just because we no more doesn’t mean were any more intelligent then our ancestors were.  Heck their brains were larger in volume than ours and we use technology to do most of our work and thinking for us.





Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  02/09  at  11:19 AM

Processing thoughts millions of times faster will allow us to bring up hundreds of simulated responses within a split second; then select the response that serves us best.

This mental trait will enable huge advances in humanity’s decision making and reasoning abilities.

As many technologies are advancing exponentially, it’s difficult to compare tomorrow’s society with today’s crude biologically-brained humans.






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376