Support the IEET

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Transhumanism - Considering Ideas From Existentialism and Religion

Why and How Should We Build a Basic Income for Every Citizen?

Can Machines Be Moral Actors?

Are hierarchical theories of freedom and responsibility plausible?

Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?

Living, intelligent patterns in Conway’s Life

ieet books

A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century
Ilia Stambler


dobermanmac on 'Can Brain Implants Make Us Smarter?' (Sep 15, 2014)

dobermanmac on 'Genetically Engineered Ethical Super Babies?' (Sep 15, 2014)

PhilOsborn on 'Do Cognitive Enhancing Drugs Actually Work?' (Sep 13, 2014)

spud100 on 'Longevity Research Program is Established in Israel' (Sep 12, 2014)

spud100 on 'I, Quantum Robot' (Sep 12, 2014)

David Pearce on 'What Does Utopia Look Like?' (Sep 12, 2014)

PhilOsborn on 'Enhancing Virtues: Caring (part 1)' (Sep 11, 2014)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Enhancing Virtues: Self-Control and Mindfulness
Aug 19, 2014
(9112) Hits
(0) Comments

“Lucy”: A Movie Review
Aug 18, 2014
(6896) Hits
(0) Comments

Enhancing Virtues: Caring (part 1)
Aug 29, 2014
(5079) Hits
(1) Comments

An open source future for synthetic biology
Sep 9, 2014
(4184) Hits
(0) Comments

Comment on this entry

Fatal Invention: The New Biopolitics of Race

November 28, 2012

“Dorothy E. Roberts - recently named Penn Integrates Knowledge Professor at the University of Pennsylvania—presenting “Fatal Invention: The New Biopolitics of Race” based on her latest book Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-first Century.

An acclaimed scholar of race, gender, and the law, Roberts examines contemporary issues in health, bioethics, and social justice with a particular focus on how they affect the lives of women, children, and African-Americans. Synthesizing a range of disciplines, she sheds light on some of humanity’s most challenging issues to bring hope and awareness to under-served members our society.”


Complete entry


Posted by Intomorrow  on  11/29  at  09:01 PM

Republicans are some of the most disappointing people of the 21st century to dialogue (monologue) with on race. What's worse is the underlying reason: nostalgia and the related reason of how the old-fashioned (not conservative) want the ambiance of the past.. which makes it rather poignant; they think we are cultural imperialists ruining their trek to a New Jerusalem.
Tom Sowell is the worst of the lot, an octogenarian full of wisdom from the past yet lacking any vision for the future; that is what discourages me, having to attempt to communicate with the old-fashioned (you cannot avoid them any day of the week in Middle America) albeit knowing there is little reason to try as you do not convince them and it becomes wasted motion for the interlocutor.
In fairness, they are practical-minded, if life was all about sports stats it would be acceptable; if life was about hunting and fishing.... life was about hunting and fishing hundreds of years ago. Thousands.
You see the anachronism? they mean well but unless you want your mind in the past and your body in the future-- we are all time- traveling into the future-- there's no connection, only really talking past them, agreeing to disagree.
So unless such changes, I don't see the hope in it. I sense it will be talking at cross purposes for decades and getting involved appears unappetising; no wonder libertarian transhumanists are often so exercised; sure wouldn't want to be them.
At any rate, some tiny good has come from the monologuing: now we can see blaming illiberalism exclusively was a race-card the Right was using. True, they did believe what they were saying, and race-hustlers and poverty-pimps do in fact exist, they're not Unicorns. However now it is coming out into the open: in pursuit of the past, the Right will sacrifice the future; now they co-opt ancient blacks such as Uncle Tom Sowell.
Sad for them, Bad for us.

Too bad we can't use Buddhist Right Speech to attempt to communicate with them: they are Christian soldiers marching as to war.

Posted by jasoncstone  on  11/30  at  06:54 PM

What do you think the implications of these ideas are on government policy? Specifically, the concept of "multiculturalism"? If the traditional categories for ethnicity and race have been debunked, then should we focus on more distributed, ground-up versions of diversity such as "pluralism"?

Pluralism seems to be more respectful of the fact that race and ethnicity have extremely pours boundaries and our dynamic, squishy concepts. Not every distinct group that forms may have an official history, founders or even a name! I believe government policies that reference diversity - including the treatment of the subject of diversity in public schools and how arts and culture funding are allocated - may no longer be legitimate if they are based on the old categories. I suggest that we need to pursue more dynamic, objective ways to foster and respect diversity as it actually is and not as we wish it to be.

Posted by Intomorrow  on  11/30  at  11:45 PM

"I believe government policies that reference diversity - including the treatment of the subject of diversity in public schools and how arts and culture funding are allocated - may no longer be legitimate if they are based on the old categories."

Yes, you summed it up well, naturally on both 'sides', multiculturalists who overemphasize differences, and the 'Right' (admittedly shorthand for everyone from rightist libertarians to totalists) who ignore oppression-- or at least overt hostility directed at certain minorities-- who say minorities are merely whining.
Have noticed during the past five decades a large percentage of the population consistently wants or needs scapegoats: in certain locales, not merely the Deep South, blacks could be blamed for one's own/collective difficulties; during the Bicentennial celebrations in '76 I was present at a restaurant in Delaware when a black was disingenuously told no seats were available; since that time such has rapidly declined to the point a 'mulatto' (a little-known fact is the quaint designation mulatto indicates outmodedness of the term "miscegenation") is now POTUS. What got me interested in gay issues was a suspicion blacks will be replaced as scapegoats by gays: in other words the want-need for scapegoats has declined yet not nearly at the rate racism has declined.

Add your comment here:




Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-297-2376