To avoid confusion we need a new, more appropriate term for the study of life than biology – which is now more properly understood as the study of life built from organic cellular chemistry. A better term for the study of life is Vitology.
...
Complete entry
Posted by
Khannea Suntzu on 02/13 at 10:55 AM
Like always you are ahead of the curve. Like always I find myself agreeing on all points, and it is just fabulous to read you statements.
The problem is (and my main criticism would be) is you create a new lingo and sexy set of noologisms that have little compelling relevancy to the actual world out there. “Coopetency”... “Geo-Ethical”... “Vitology”... these are hardly established mainstream concepts. I mean, anyone can be a philosophical stand up comedian and come up with a barrage of truly unique new concepts (hey I do so all the time) but what relevancy in the current cynical climate does this have?
This is by and large Terasem stuff. Mind you I just adore the whole Terasem shtick. But how can you make sure that these ideas won’t end up a marginal footnote in history?
If I may make the silly suggestion from the audience (remember those annoying old guys at The Muppet show) - hire a PR consultancy firm to better get these ideas across. These actually are very important concepts, but they aren’t innately compelling to all the ignoramuses out there that don’t immediately get it.
IEET Blog