Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, With Limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype


comments

veronica on 'Morality, With Limits' (Mar 21, 2010)

Marianne Waldow on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

Mike Treder on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Comment on this entry

The New Renaissance




July 06, 2008

In this keynote “invocation,” which opened the second day of Personal Democracy Forum on June 24, 2008, Doug argues that there is no such thing as “personal democracy” and genuine democratic discourse can only be participatory and collective. The power to write and publish, he notes, may finally be in the hands of everyone (after centuries of domination by religious and political elites), but real democracy isn’t just blogging and commenting, it’s treating the entire world as “open source” and remarkable by direct participation.

... Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  07/12  at  11:29 AM

Can you specify what you mean at the end when you request that the government "create the conditions by which we can finally start doing these for each other?"

In what way will individual rights be preserved in your particular vision of a “cyber” collective? How are such rights compatible or incompatible with your proposed system?

At the beginning you assert that individualism leads to susceptibility to tyranny and that a strong collective would fight tyranny. Socialist and fascist (collectivist) movements over the last 100 years produced death on the scale of a 100 million, and a wider scope of misery. Each such movement promised decentralized authority over the collective but always results in the opposite outcome with truly horrific results. How will your desired political changes avoid such outcomes?

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, With Limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376