Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Superintelligences Are Already Out There!

For a Longer, Brighter and More Just Future

The small and surprisingly dangerous detail the police track about you

Alan Watts by South Park creators (All in one in HD)

Prototype

The Singularity - feat. Ray Kurzweil & Alex Jones


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

AmbassadorZot on '#22: Ray Kurzweil on Rationality and the Moral Considerability of Intelligent Machines' (Dec 20, 2014)

pansi4 on 'The Slut Shaming, Sex-Negative Message in the Christmas Story: It's Worth a Family Conversation' (Dec 20, 2014)

Vigrith on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Dec 20, 2014)

ericscoles on 'The small and surprisingly dangerous detail the police track about you' (Dec 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Wage Slavery and Sweatshops as Free Enterprise?' (Dec 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 18, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 18, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Review of Michio Kaku’s, Visions: How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st Century
Dec 15, 2014
(9796) Hits
(0) Comments

What Will Life Be Like Inside A Computer?
Dec 7, 2014
(8424) Hits
(0) Comments

Bitcoin and Science: DNA is the Original Decentralized System
Nov 24, 2014
(8061) Hits
(0) Comments

Is AI a Myth?
Nov 30, 2014
(5242) Hits
(32) Comments



Comment on this entry

Studying Brain-to-Computer Interfaces Only on Humans: with great results!


December 19, 2012

Brain to computer interfaces that can actually tell you what people are thinking. The brain detail is said to be “amazing” today and is rapidly growing to understand how the brain functions. They can now tell from brain signals if one moves a hand to the left or to right, etc. The team says they have no clue how far this technology will go, only the future will tell.

Instead of experimenting on animals this team is working purely on understanding the human brain through the use of studying only on humans.

 

 


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by b.  on  12/19  at  07:20 PM

"Brain to computer interfaces that can actually tell you what people are thinking" Really? I only know of interfaces that can read what we perceive (external visual information) and what we are intending our muscles to do (motor cortex). I think calling these things "thought" is a stretch, because then you could read someone's "thoughts" just by feeling the tension in their muscles, or reading nerve info in the PNS or optic nerves. What does it mean for someone to think "EE", is it a specific and slight tension in mouth, tongue and diagram? Is it the result of sonic mental imagery? Is it the the memory recall of a sound? These claims are not meaningful without knowing the answers to these questions, and AFAIK we don't.

If there is a working system that reads thoughts (like the content of working memory, or an imagined visual image) then please post a link!



Posted by Kris Notaro  on  12/19  at  08:24 PM

I am 99.99 percent against animal testing.

However, with that said, check out these links:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/471786.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGsRoocMHAA

However I agree that to really read the brain 100% and communicate its qualia we will need advanced technologies, maybe even nano-bots that can pass the blood-brain-barrier and send signals to a computer.



Posted by b.  on  12/20  at  12:10 PM

I agree that animal studies are unethical. The only way to get the spatial and temporal resolution required for these studies is highly invasive and animal is destroyed afterwards.

I checked out the first link but don't have time right now to watch the BBC doc. I was not aware of thalamus recordings of visual perception. FYI as far as I understand it the thalamus routes pretty much all cortical activity, so its slightly unclear how easy it would be to find the visual parts alone. It is interesting in that the thalamus is implicated in consciousness.

The reason why the brain-reading studies are motor and sensory based is because that is how they correlate the brain activity with an objectively observable aspect (map VC activity to a perceptual image, or map motor activity to muscle movement of EMG).

If the case of self-speech (and other thoughts) we have no objectively observable feature to correlate the brain activity with. Sure you could tell a person to say something specific in their head over and over again, but there are still lots of variables, in what voice is it said? How fast is it said? Accent? Volume? Distance? We know our brains are active all the time, so its unclear what aspects of that activity is conscious and what aspects are not, so separating out conscious from unconscious thought would be tricky to say the least. Just think of a Freudian slip case, a person thinks they are saying one thing, but their mouths are saying another. How would brain-reading tell which one is the "thought"?

This is a key methodological problem with any "thought" reading.

My main criticism of these studies is that we already have a highly evolved system that interfaces the brain with the external world (technologies and other people), its the PNS. It is so effective that we are hardly aware of it mediating our thoughts. These studies seem to miss the whole realization that cognition is embodied. Reading the PNS (EMG, etc.) directly has many massive advantages to reading the brain directly. Its not not as cool because it does not subscribe to the sci-fi brain in the jar idea.




Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376