Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Review The Future: What is the Future of Education?

Neuroscience Symposium: Genetics in psychiatry

Drug That Lost High-Stakes Political Fight For Funding Now Being Used Against Ebola

Planetary Boundaries And Global Catastrophic Risk

Morality and God

Random Neuron Connections


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

rms on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

instamatic on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

rms on 'Science Fiction and our Dreams of the Future' (Oct 20, 2014)

rms on 'Sousveillance and Surveillance: What kind of future do we want?' (Oct 20, 2014)

dobermanmac on 'Transhumanism and the Will to Power' (Oct 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?' (Oct 18, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?' (Oct 18, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Google’s Cold Betrayal of the Internet
Oct 10, 2014
(7422) Hits
(2) Comments

Dawkins and the “We are going to die” -Argument
Sep 25, 2014
(5568) Hits
(21) Comments

Should we abolish work?
Oct 3, 2014
(5022) Hits
(1) Comments

Will we uplift other species to sapience?
Sep 25, 2014
(4539) Hits
(0) Comments



Comment on this entry

Terminating the Terminator: What to do About Autonomous Weapons


Wendell Wallach


scienceprogress.org

January 29, 2013

“The Terminator” is clearly science fiction, but it speaks to a deep intuition that the robotization of warfare is a slippery slope—the endpoint of which can neither be predicted nor fully controlled. Two reports released soon after the November 2012 election have propelled the issue of autonomous killing machines onto the political radar.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by SHaGGGz  on  01/29  at  09:23 PM

“Furthermore, delegating life and death decisions to machines is immoral because machines cannot be held responsible for their actions.”
This hardly seems relevant. As long as these machines lack personhood, their actions are the direct responsibility of the forces that choose to deploy them, as they are but tools, no different in principle except more complex intermediate steps between deployment (with human intent) and completion (result of said human intent). Whether it’s a drone being piloted by some guy in a bunker halfway across the world or by a sophisticated object detection algorithm, the relevant factor is who gets killed as a result.





Posted by David Cooper  on  01/30  at  03:32 PM

“So let us establish an international principle that machines should not be making decisions that are harmful to humans.”

If we’re to interpret that as “harmful to any humans”, it won’t work - machines will often need to kill a few bad people in order to save many good people and it would be wrong to ban them from doing so. If it’s to be interpreted as “harmful to people in general”, then it will allow killing of bad people: murderers and warmongers. The military hopefully wants to use machines to kill bad people and to avoid killing good people, and that would be absolutely the right thing to do. What could rightly be banned is any use of machines which set out to kill good people on the bahalf of bad people, but the kind of people who want their machines to do that will not respect laws and will have to be defeated militarily. The only solution to this will be a military fight over control of the planet, though most of the action will actually come in the form of assasinations carried out by people on the instructions of artificial intelligence with no involvement of any robotic capability.





Posted by HowardI  on  01/30  at  06:54 PM

Unfortunately, with Islamic extremism threatening to inflame North Africa from Morocco to Egypt and south to Kenya, the disintegration of Syria threatening Lebanon and Jordan, the threat of the explosion throughout the Turkic “Stan’s” of the old Soviet Union, the increasing intensity of competition for water supplies between China and the countries of South Asia, the need for the United States to require increasing leverage for it military power, makes increasingly predictable, in the short and medium term, the development of exceedingly lethal and increasingly autonomous weapons.
So…





Posted by IgorGabrielan  on  02/04  at  07:43 PM

Need to develop a machine that will deal exclusively with the extermination of robots - “Robot Fighters”






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376