Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Everyone loves a genetically modified mosquito – right?

Are We Ready for Designer Babies?

The End of Religion: Technology and the Future

Multifunctional fibers communicate with the brain

The Power of Pull

Yes, Obama “Won Twice” – as a Progressive. Deal With It, Everybody.


ieet books

How “God” Works: A Logical Inquiry on Faith
Author
Marshall Brain


comments

CygnusX1 on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 25, 2015)

Rick Searle on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

jasoncstone on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

SharZ on 'Problems with Defining an Existential Risk' (Jan 24, 2015)

Lincoln Cannon on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

philosophytorres on 'Problems with Defining an Existential Risk' (Jan 23, 2015)

Knotanumber on 'Religion’s Dirty Dozen—12 Really Bad Religious Ideas That Have Made the World Worse' (Jan 23, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Bad luck and cancer – did the media get it wrong?
Jan 3, 2015
(18199) Hits
(4) Comments

#8: Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Dec 28, 2014
(11557) Hits
(0) Comments

#9: Creating sentient machines with ‘deep learning’ AI technology
Dec 28, 2014
(8925) Hits
(0) Comments

#6: Living for 1,000 years: an ‘out of this world’ future awaits us
Dec 30, 2014
(8493) Hits
(1) Comments



Comment on this entry

Terminating the Terminator: What to do About Autonomous Weapons


Wendell Wallach


scienceprogress.org

January 29, 2013

“The Terminator” is clearly science fiction, but it speaks to a deep intuition that the robotization of warfare is a slippery slope—the endpoint of which can neither be predicted nor fully controlled. Two reports released soon after the November 2012 election have propelled the issue of autonomous killing machines onto the political radar.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by SHaGGGz  on  01/29  at  09:23 PM

“Furthermore, delegating life and death decisions to machines is immoral because machines cannot be held responsible for their actions.”
This hardly seems relevant. As long as these machines lack personhood, their actions are the direct responsibility of the forces that choose to deploy them, as they are but tools, no different in principle except more complex intermediate steps between deployment (with human intent) and completion (result of said human intent). Whether it’s a drone being piloted by some guy in a bunker halfway across the world or by a sophisticated object detection algorithm, the relevant factor is who gets killed as a result.





Posted by David Cooper  on  01/30  at  03:32 PM

“So let us establish an international principle that machines should not be making decisions that are harmful to humans.”

If we’re to interpret that as “harmful to any humans”, it won’t work - machines will often need to kill a few bad people in order to save many good people and it would be wrong to ban them from doing so. If it’s to be interpreted as “harmful to people in general”, then it will allow killing of bad people: murderers and warmongers. The military hopefully wants to use machines to kill bad people and to avoid killing good people, and that would be absolutely the right thing to do. What could rightly be banned is any use of machines which set out to kill good people on the bahalf of bad people, but the kind of people who want their machines to do that will not respect laws and will have to be defeated militarily. The only solution to this will be a military fight over control of the planet, though most of the action will actually come in the form of assasinations carried out by people on the instructions of artificial intelligence with no involvement of any robotic capability.





Posted by HowardI  on  01/30  at  06:54 PM

Unfortunately, with Islamic extremism threatening to inflame North Africa from Morocco to Egypt and south to Kenya, the disintegration of Syria threatening Lebanon and Jordan, the threat of the explosion throughout the Turkic “Stan’s” of the old Soviet Union, the increasing intensity of competition for water supplies between China and the countries of South Asia, the need for the United States to require increasing leverage for it military power, makes increasingly predictable, in the short and medium term, the development of exceedingly lethal and increasingly autonomous weapons.
So…





Posted by IgorGabrielan  on  02/04  at  07:43 PM

Need to develop a machine that will deal exclusively with the extermination of robots - “Robot Fighters”






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376