IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


Hayles shadowboxes with transhumanism

Singular Sensations

The Chemistry of Love

Human-racism and biopolitics in SF

Dupuy’s “anti-humanism”

Recent Comments


Roko on 'Singularities Enough, and Time' (2008 07 03)

Michalis on 'Getting Paid in Our Jobless Future' (2008 07 03)

director on 'Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective' (2008 07 02)

rich on 'Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective' (2008 07 02)

jerry on 'It's the Business of the Future to be Dangerous' (2008 07 01)




IEET Fora




"If we get past the 'yuck'...we find that engineering of humans is not only ubiquitous and a function of ordinary human life as well as high-technology science, but also that the rules for avoiding ‘yuck' are a mere matter of faith themselves in the articles of a flimsy new kind of neoconservative natural law theory. And perhaps we are better off yucky but complicated than in the clean, well-lit spaces of the illusory safety of a ‘nature' that doesn't really exist."
Glenn McGee, "Leon the Professional"



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Rights > Economic > Life > Health > Marcelo Rinesi

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Demography and Emerging Technologies


Marcelo Rinesi

Marcelo Rinesi


Ethical Technology


Posted: Jan 23, 2007

If demography is fate, then emerging technologies’ political fate looks bright indeed.

Perhaps the most glaring paradox in the current debate about emerging technologies is the fact that high levels of public distaste for them -sometimes downright hostility- is coupled in daily life with their enthusiastic adoption: Viagra is one of the most successful drugs of all time. Electronic devices that would have been called nanotechnological marvels years ago are bought without a second thought.  Bayesian spam filters and Google’s algorithm are gratefully used as informational gateways by most computer users. The demand for products and interventions capable of making us look and feel younger is, as always has been, nearly unlimited.

As a society, we generally don’t approve of most emerging technologies until we need them and they are available. Then the story changes.

Right now, by a combination of demographic and technological trends, the developed world is simultaneously facing a quick demographic transition to old societies (Japan’s median age is 42.9 years), together with tantalizing discoveries in biogerontology, neurobiology and information technology that point the way toward… Well, increased lifespans, cognitive enhancement and anti-aging research sound science-fictional or disturbing to most people, but as retirement ages are pushed back, cognitive demands rise in the workplace, and entertainment and social options are made more complex and shifting by technological mediation, what is seen now as speculative enhancement will most likely become basic tools to get by.

Two factors will combine, I think, to lower resistance to these developments: the political strengthening of the 50+ cohort -one of the fastest-rising populations in the developed world, and also, as that’s the point in life when cognitive productivity begins to decay, the most immediately eager for emerging technologies- and the fiscal and business realities of societies that will need to keep scarce and highly valuable information workers productive for as long as possible in order to remain competitive.

Needless to say, this doesn’t mean that all emerging technologies will get a political free pass, nor that we should want it to be so. The need to explore ways to insure the ethical, responsible use of these technologies will be made, if anything, more urgent as demand rises.

But -and this is the characteristic mark of all technological revolutions- it’ll certainly be a different game.


Marcelo Rinesi is the Assistant Director of the IEET. Mr. Rinesi is an IT consultant and writer based in Buenos Aires.

permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Treder's CRN Develops Nanotech Development Scenarios

Previous entry: New SF short fiction blog

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376