Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

American Society for Engineering Education: Why Diversity is so Important

Why there is no mind/body problem

Why Solitary Confinement Is The Worst Kind Of Psychological Torture

The Trifecta of Roommate Selection Technology: Privacy, Prejudice, And Diversity

The Maverick Nanny with a Dopamine Drip: Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation

Chiding CEOs at Walgreens and Other Corporate Defectors


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

Giulio Prisco on 'Why We’ll Still Be Fighting About Religious Freedom 200 Years From Now!' (Jul 25, 2014)

Giulio Prisco on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 25, 2014)

instamatic on 'Should we have a right not to work?' (Jul 24, 2014)

instamatic on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)

DrJohnty on 'LEV: The Game – Play to Win Indefinite Life' (Jul 24, 2014)

Taiwanlight on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)

Jønathan Lyons on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Nanomedical Cognitive Enhancement
Jul 11, 2014
(5786) Hits
(0) Comments

Is it possible to build an artificial superintelligence without fully replicating the human brain?
Jun 25, 2014
(5737) Hits
(1) Comments

Interview with Transhumanist Biohacker Rich Lee
Jul 8, 2014
(5554) Hits
(0) Comments

Virtually Sacred, by Robert Geraci – religion in World of Warcraft and Second Life
Jul 3, 2014
(4261) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Security > Resilience > Rights > Economic > Vision > Bioculture > Futurism > Galactic > Contributors > Charlie Stross

Print Email permalink (4) Comments (3358) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Designing Society for Posterity


Charlie Stross
Charlie Stross
Charlie's diary

Posted: Nov 12, 2009

How do you design a society for the really long term? There are a couple of levels to consider: notably, decision-making and economics. And it doesn’t look as if we’ve got any good solutions to either.

Generation starships: they’re not fast. If you can crank yourself up to 1% of light-speed, alpha centauri is more than four and a half centuries away at cruising speed. To put it in perspective, that’s the same span of time that separates us from the Conquistadores and the Reformation; it’s twice the lifespan of the United States of America.

We humans are really bad at designing institutions that outlast the life expectancy of a single human being. The average democratically elected administration lasts 3-8 years; public corporations last 30 years; the Leninist project lasted 70 years (and went off the rails after a decade). The Catholic Church, the Japanese monarchy, and a few other institutions have lasted more than a millennium, but they’re all almost unrecognizably different.

Consumer capitalism along our current model simply won’t work as a way of running a long-duration generation ship (the failure modes are lethal and non-recoverable). Communism (or rather, Leninism) has a slightly better prospect, but is still a long way from optimal. Monarchism is just a pretty word for “hereditary dictatorship supported by military caste”. What are the alternatives? And what do we need to consider when designing a society that can survive for a 500-1000 year voyage in a bottle without exploding? (I’m assuming, for the sake of argument, that suspended animation or life extension technologies don’t change the picture out of all recognition; after all, even if you can expect to be alive in a thousand year’s time when you reach Barnard’s Star, you’re not going to get on the ship in the first place if the living conditions are intolerable.)

Designing a space habitat/generation ship with the implicit parameter that the crew are expected to work 40-60 hours a week is a really bad idea; efficiency is the enemy of redundancy, and multiple redundancy (in life support and propulsion) is absolutely vital to any such project (because it provides resiliency that is essential to have any hope of recovering from a disaster). What if the population crashes? If you’ve designed your ship to require a 40-hour work week by 1000 maintenance crew and you’re down to 250 crew, you’re going to die. A 10-hour work week, in contrast, gives them a fighting chance of survival in event of a major die-off.

A sensibly designed long-duration hab would require the crew to do just enough work to maintain the necessary skill set (you don’t want them to go rusty), but leave lots of time available for education, recreation, and socialisation. You can’t build a stable hab culture on material acquisition because it has to function in a resource-bounded environment (although soft goods/intellectual property is another matter, if you want to provide an escape valve for acquisitive urges, or a “training wheels” environment for the market-mediated culture that you might need to revive after arriving in another solar system).

I’ve been (inconclusively) batting around some ideas with Karl Schroeder — how do you design a society for the really long term? There are a couple of levels to consider: notably, decision-making and economics. And it doesn’t look as if we’ve got any good solutions to either.

Administration first: Democracy is prone to mutation into some other form (kakistocracy, oligarchy, populist dictatorship). Monarchy has a single point of failure and historically only worked when there was a draconian enforcement regime backed up by Malthusian pressure (whenever the lid came off — e.g. with the opening of a new frontier for emigration — the oppressed tended to vote with their feet: aboard a generation ship, their only option would be to vote with the knife). We were somewhat intrigued by the idea of a society with multiple designed-in local attractors, so that over time it can oscillate between different modes of governance (but returning eventually to previous patterns); but nobody’s tried it yet.

Another issue to consider is the need for designed-in escape valves. The social pressure on a generation ship is going to be fierce; but if there’s a designed-in expectation that, say, 20-50% of the inhabitants at any given time will be preoccupied by non-functional distractions such as the arts or sports, that might go some way to defusing social stresses. Arts and sports can act as vectors for social competition and status-seeking, while being channeled easily in directions that don’t consume excessive physical resources.

One thing I’m pretty certain of is that the protestant work ethic underlying American-style capitalism, with its added dog-eat-dog ethos, would be a recipe for disaster aboard a generation ship — regardless of whether it’s run as a democracy or a dictatorship. American (or British) working hours are a bizarre cultural aberration — and a very local one. More to the point, competitive capitalism tends to reward increases in operational efficiency, but efficiency is most easily optimized by paring away at the margins — a long-term lethal threat to life in this situation. The “tragedy of the commons” has got to be engineered out aboard a generation ship, otherwise the residents will wake up one [virtual] morning to discover someone’s acquired a monopoly on the oxygen supply. And that’s just for starters.

(Finally, don’t get me started on libertarianism. Economic libertarianism—in the contemporary American sense—aboard a generation ship would be just plain suicidal. It’s dog-eat-dog capitalism with the brakes off; I’m of the opinion that libertarian ideology is based on a falacious theory of mind, and would in practice degenerate rapidly into a rather nasty form of industrial feudalism. The end point of which is monarchism, and bloody handed revolution. Not the kind of metastable multiple-attractor society I have in mind at all ...!)

So. You, and a quarter of a million other folks, have embarked on a 1000-year voyage aboard a hollowed-out asteroid. What sort of governance and society do you think would be most comfortable, not to mention likely to survive the trip without civil war, famine, and reigns of terror? (NB: communication with the home world is assumed, as is the ability to implement any innovations they come up with that don’t require a work force greater than 10% of your people.)


Charles Stross is an award-winning (Hugo, Nebula and Locus) science fiction and horror writer based in Edinburgh, Scotland.               

Print Email permalink (4) Comments (3359) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Well, people already ignore / neglect their partners, family & friends for the wonders of Everquest or Warcraft.  So, if you assume an improved virtual playground on the starship, I doubt if the people would much care how the ship is managed. So long as they are fed and watered, most of the human status seeking could be moved to virtual reality. The ship management would be done by computer anyway. Improved robotics might even make the humans unnecessary for tightening loose screws and swapping out failed components.





The fact that you are not able to envision a libertarian society inside a hollowed-out asteroid don’t matter.  I think it is possible if the “ship” is designed correctly.

1) 250.000 people need a fairly complex economic structure that need a free market. If they are able to communicate with the home planet to implement innovations, they really need it, as the market is adaptive.

2) It is a given that the ship will need many redundant services to recycle stuff, produce energy, etc. They can easily be run in a free market, so the people running it can no have a monopoly over a single service or product.

3) The best way to produce (2) is to have a generational fleet where single ships exchange services and goods. A ship would be someway independent from the others, but it would have a strong incentive to have peaceful relations with other ships in the fleet because specialization would let them to enjoy greater productivity and less work.

The biggest problem is population control and selection.
If the urge to procreate is not controlled there is no way out of famine and war. So it must be expected that procreation must have a large cost (but not large enough to prevent women from having children).
Multiple ships work better to force the cost of procreating on the procreators and unwanted people would be forced to stay on their home ship and would be prevented from going to other ships.
Another advantage is that a group trying to take over all the fleet would have an hard time to take and keep control, where would be much more easier on a single big ship.





It certainly seems doubtful, given past precedent, that any sample of the human race would be able to sustain itself for such lengths of time without splitting in to factions and fighting for the right to govern.

But if all humans could be held in stasis for the duration of the journey, then maybe the passing of time and issues around surrounding generational development become irrelevant. Your awareness of time would end as you go under and only re-emerge as you wake up. There could be a thousand years in between… assuming the ship will be able to maintain itself (and the sleeping crew) then there’s no problem.

The whole idea of physically boarding a vessel is starting to look a little archaic though… what if we were able to ‘vibrate’ at any given point in the universe without the need to actually travel?





“The Catholic Church, the Japanese monarchy, and a few other institutions have lasted more than a millennium, but they’re all almost unrecognizably different.”

Well, there is /one/ religious group that has lasted around three millenia, and you would most likely consider them recognizably similar to the way it looked then. And they’ve even managed to maintain most of the ideals despite the fact that they’ve been scattered throughout the world.

Oh, but they’re religious, so scratch that idea.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Dissociation & Second Life: Pathology or a State of Mind?

Previous entry: Let’s Get Metaphysical: How our ongoing existence could appear increasingly absurd

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376