Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Are hierarchical theories of freedom and responsibility plausible?

Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?

Living, intelligent patterns in Conway’s Life

Hollywood Must Turn Its Head to Personalized Longevity Science instead of Anti-Aging Pseudoremedies

MMR Vaccines and Autism: Bringing clarity to the CDC Whistleblower Story

Singularity 1 on 1: Practopoiesis Tells Us Machine Learning Is Not Enough!


ieet books

A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century
Author
Ilia Stambler


comments

dobermanmac on 'Can Brain Implants Make Us Smarter?' (Sep 15, 2014)

dobermanmac on 'Genetically Engineered Ethical Super Babies?' (Sep 15, 2014)

PhilOsborn on 'Do Cognitive Enhancing Drugs Actually Work?' (Sep 13, 2014)

spud100 on 'Longevity Research Program is Established in Israel' (Sep 12, 2014)

spud100 on 'I, Quantum Robot' (Sep 12, 2014)

David Pearce on 'What Does Utopia Look Like?' (Sep 12, 2014)

PhilOsborn on 'Enhancing Virtues: Caring (part 1)' (Sep 11, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Enhancing Virtues: Self-Control and Mindfulness
Aug 19, 2014
(9092) Hits
(0) Comments

“Lucy”: A Movie Review
Aug 18, 2014
(6889) Hits
(0) Comments

Enhancing Virtues: Caring (part 1)
Aug 29, 2014
(5074) Hits
(1) Comments

An open source future for synthetic biology
Sep 9, 2014
(4133) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Rights > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3835) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Welcome to real science!


Andrew Maynard
By Andrew Maynard
2020 Science

Posted: Jun 25, 2010

The way science is taught, the way it’s portrayed on TV and in the press, the way it’s promoted by science-advocates and science bloggers, often seems to adhere to a rather pompous and hubristic view of science as the ultimate bastion of truth and certainty. So it’s been rather refreshing this week to see a group of real-world scientists shattering this image in the online event I’m A Scientist, Get Me Out Of Here!

image
For those of you who haven’t been following this, I’m A Scientist is a two-week UK-based event where up to 8,000 teenagers quiz 100 scientists on any and every subject under the sun, before they decide who is worthy of a £500 prize in support of science communication. It’s an inspired event that puts students in charge of the conversation – and one that I am privileged to a part of this time round.

Half way through, the event has been intense – with over 100 live chats between scientists and classes of students, and literally thousands of questions and answers (scientists in the Cancer Zone – just one of twenty zones – have received over 700 questions from students so far!).

But what has struck me more than anything perhaps has been the honesty and humility of the scientists taking part.

Maybe it’s responding to kids that brings out the honesty (I know I have made a rule of answering questions as openly and as honestly as possible – because you don’t mess around with kids). Maybe it’s that this is a bunch of real-world scientists, rather than the vocal minority that people are usually exposed to. But the lack of science romanticism here has been eye-opening.

From subjects spanning global warming to evolution, and religion to animal testing, I’ve repeatedly seen participants lay out their honest opinions – even if they don’t match exactly with established opinion. The responses have not always clean and homogeneous and “politically correct” – sometimes even the science behind them isn’t as robust as some would like.

But this is how real scientists perceive their work, the world, and their place in it.

In other words, the answers to questions emerging on I’m A Scientist are probably a good reflection what the science community is actually like, rather than what we would sometimes like to think it is like.

I suspect the value of this honesty and humility is immense. Clearly, it provides the students taking part in I’m A Scientist with a realistic view of what science is really like – and probably a more believable and attractive one than some idealized vision of the scientific endeavor. I also think it is proving liberating to the scientists involved – providing them the opportunity to explore and express their honest perspective on things.

But just as importantly – the event is leading to a unique resource documenting what scientists really think – not just what they think they should think.

In the long run, this may be an incredibly important added-value within what is already an extremely high-value initiative.


Andrew Maynard is Director of the Risk Science Center at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3836) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


What else does science produce but data? To me, science = increasingly accurate data about the world that you can use to make the uncaring universe more human-(and other life)friendly. And you get that data by observation, experiments, physics, and math. Is there more to it?





Maybe the openness comes from the situation where scientists feel they are giving honest answers to honest questions. The kids just want to know. They don’t want to try to trap the scientists with a hidden political and religious agenda.

There seems to be an assault on science these days from creationists desperate to ensure science supports their literalist beliefs to the unknown group who had the resources, the money and the lack of scruples to hack into scientists emails (a criminal act no less) in an effort to discredit climate change. Scientists can no longer (if they ever could) ignore the attacks and have to develop defensive strategies on top of the normal debates they naturally have with each other so I’m sure they are under more pressure than ever before. I can imagine it’s something of a relief just to talk science with interested, no-hidden-agenda type individuals.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us

Previous entry: Why “Why Transhumanism Won’t Work” Won’t Work

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376