Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Review The Future: What is the Future of Education?

Neuroscience Symposium: Genetics in psychiatry

Drug That Lost High-Stakes Political Fight For Funding Now Being Used Against Ebola

Planetary Boundaries And Global Catastrophic Risk

Morality and God

Random Neuron Connections


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

rms on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

instamatic on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

rms on 'Science Fiction and our Dreams of the Future' (Oct 20, 2014)

rms on 'Sousveillance and Surveillance: What kind of future do we want?' (Oct 20, 2014)

dobermanmac on 'Transhumanism and the Will to Power' (Oct 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?' (Oct 18, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?' (Oct 18, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Google’s Cold Betrayal of the Internet
Oct 10, 2014
(7422) Hits
(2) Comments

Dawkins and the “We are going to die” -Argument
Sep 25, 2014
(5561) Hits
(21) Comments

Should we abolish work?
Oct 3, 2014
(5022) Hits
(1) Comments

Will we uplift other species to sapience?
Sep 25, 2014
(4537) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Rights > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3879) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Welcome to real science!


Andrew Maynard
By Andrew Maynard
2020 Science

Posted: Jun 25, 2010

The way science is taught, the way it’s portrayed on TV and in the press, the way it’s promoted by science-advocates and science bloggers, often seems to adhere to a rather pompous and hubristic view of science as the ultimate bastion of truth and certainty. So it’s been rather refreshing this week to see a group of real-world scientists shattering this image in the online event I’m A Scientist, Get Me Out Of Here!

image
For those of you who haven’t been following this, I’m A Scientist is a two-week UK-based event where up to 8,000 teenagers quiz 100 scientists on any and every subject under the sun, before they decide who is worthy of a £500 prize in support of science communication. It’s an inspired event that puts students in charge of the conversation – and one that I am privileged to a part of this time round.

Half way through, the event has been intense – with over 100 live chats between scientists and classes of students, and literally thousands of questions and answers (scientists in the Cancer Zone – just one of twenty zones – have received over 700 questions from students so far!).

But what has struck me more than anything perhaps has been the honesty and humility of the scientists taking part.

Maybe it’s responding to kids that brings out the honesty (I know I have made a rule of answering questions as openly and as honestly as possible – because you don’t mess around with kids). Maybe it’s that this is a bunch of real-world scientists, rather than the vocal minority that people are usually exposed to. But the lack of science romanticism here has been eye-opening.

From subjects spanning global warming to evolution, and religion to animal testing, I’ve repeatedly seen participants lay out their honest opinions – even if they don’t match exactly with established opinion. The responses have not always clean and homogeneous and “politically correct” – sometimes even the science behind them isn’t as robust as some would like.

But this is how real scientists perceive their work, the world, and their place in it.

In other words, the answers to questions emerging on I’m A Scientist are probably a good reflection what the science community is actually like, rather than what we would sometimes like to think it is like.

I suspect the value of this honesty and humility is immense. Clearly, it provides the students taking part in I’m A Scientist with a realistic view of what science is really like – and probably a more believable and attractive one than some idealized vision of the scientific endeavor. I also think it is proving liberating to the scientists involved – providing them the opportunity to explore and express their honest perspective on things.

But just as importantly – the event is leading to a unique resource documenting what scientists really think – not just what they think they should think.

In the long run, this may be an incredibly important added-value within what is already an extremely high-value initiative.


Andrew Maynard is Director of the Risk Science Center at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3880) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


What else does science produce but data? To me, science = increasingly accurate data about the world that you can use to make the uncaring universe more human-(and other life)friendly. And you get that data by observation, experiments, physics, and math. Is there more to it?





Maybe the openness comes from the situation where scientists feel they are giving honest answers to honest questions. The kids just want to know. They don’t want to try to trap the scientists with a hidden political and religious agenda.

There seems to be an assault on science these days from creationists desperate to ensure science supports their literalist beliefs to the unknown group who had the resources, the money and the lack of scruples to hack into scientists emails (a criminal act no less) in an effort to discredit climate change. Scientists can no longer (if they ever could) ignore the attacks and have to develop defensive strategies on top of the normal debates they naturally have with each other so I’m sure they are under more pressure than ever before. I can imagine it’s something of a relief just to talk science with interested, no-hidden-agenda type individuals.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us

Previous entry: Why “Why Transhumanism Won’t Work” Won’t Work

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376