Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies


The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Overview of technopolitics


whats new at ieet

Blockchain – The Building Blocks for a New Society, with Vince Meens

Martine Rothblatt, Lawrence Krauss, Douglas Rushkoff, Russell Blackford endorse Science Missionaries

Trump Picks Establishment Banker For Treasury Secretary

Trump’s Pick for Health Secretary Is Total Nightmare Fuel

First Republican “Hamilton Elector” Breaks Ranks Against Trump

Cybathlon 2016 : entre sport, handicap et transhumanisme


ieet books

TECHNOPROG, le transhumanisme au service du progrès social
Author
Marc Roux and Didier Coeurnelle





JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life


IEET > Vision > Bioculture > Staff > Marcelo Rinesi

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (3447) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Death by (lack of a) drugs (culture)


Marcelo Rinesi
By Marcelo Rinesi
Ethical Technology

Posted: Nov 20, 2012

A recent report from the Los Angeles Times underscored what amounts to an epidemic of deaths in the US caused at least in part by overdoses of legally prescribed drugs. The root problem, though, is one of cultural technology rather than chemistry or regulation.

We can begin to sketch the limits of the problem by noting that “keeping out” dangerous drugs is impossible, as there’s no medically useful substance that isn’t, when used improperly, dangerous or even lethal. A second observation is that legal regulation, while necessary, is hardly sufficient, because the personal and financial incentives involved are huge (both arguments, by the way, are equally applicable to the War on Non-FDA-Approved Drugs).

This is hardly a new feature in human history, which can, up to a point, be characterized by our search of psychoactive substances and activities. Drugs like alcohol, opium, or tobacco have at times caused significant societal damages, which led to different degrees of legal regulation, but in all cases, the key factor in their long-term management has been the culture-wide development of a shared knowledge base on how to best use the substance in a way the culture feels balances its benefits and drawbacks. The divergent stories of alcohol and tobacco regulation in the United States show how complex can be the interplay between cultural mores, the law, and medical knowledge, and how, ultimately, societal learning is what makes laws effective in this regard if they are to be all effective.

This isn’t an smooth or even irreversible path. Witness Russia’s high rate of alcohol-related deaths after the fall of the Soviet Union, despite their long cultural experience with the substance. To be fair, that kind of geopolitical shock will affect you no matter what, and alcohol probably just happened to be their poison of choice.

There are things, however, that can slow down this process of learning, extending the problems associated with any substance. Making drugs (whether with or without known medical uses) downright illegal or assuming that regulation alone will work, which puts the use and knowledge of these substance in the hands of a very small set of people, do little or nothing to prevent deaths in the short term, and, by severely restricting familiarity with their use, contribute to an unnecessary number of deaths over the long term. A parallel can be drawn with condom usage: it was by widespread knowledge sharing about safe sex practices, and not by preventing sex, than both STDs and unwanted pregnancies have diminished across most of the world – and not coincidentally, in a pattern very well correlated with education and access to information.

There are few things more dangerous than ignorance, particularly when it comes to our bodies and the things we do with and to them. There’s no substitute to informed knowledge when it comes to your own sex life; perhaps it’s time to take a similar level of ownership of our medicine cabinets.


Marcelo Rinesi is the IEET's Chief Technology Officer, and former Assistant Director. He is also a freelance Data Intelligence Analyst.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (3448) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Thanksgiving 2042: ‘Turkey Day’ in a future wonderworld

Previous entry: How to “sketch” with electronics

HOME | ABOUT | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
35 Harbor Point Blvd, #404, Boston, MA 02125-3242 USA
Email: director @ ieet.org