Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies


The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Overview of technopolitics


whats new at ieet

First Republican “Hamilton Elector” Breaks Ranks Against Trump

Cybathlon 2016 : entre sport, handicap et transhumanisme

U.S. To Forgive $108 Billion In Student Debt

The informal sector Singularity

Global Trends - The Rising Longevity Industry

Mark Blyth ─ Global Trumpism


ieet books

TECHNOPROG, le transhumanisme au service du progrès social
Author
Marc Roux and Didier Coeurnelle





JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life


IEET > Vision > Contributors > HealthLongevity > Enablement > Dick Pelletier > Futurism > Innovation

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (5067) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Will indefinite lifespan become reality? The possibilities are there!


Dick Pelletier
By Dick Pelletier
Ethical Technology

Posted: Dec 14, 2012

Exponentially-advancing technologies could provide an indefinite lifespan by mid-century or before, experts say. Many factors drive this futuristic prospect forward:

1) Everyone believes life is too short, and businesses stand to make billions from medical advances.

2) A recent UN “State of the Future” report describes how science and technology information, spread via the Internet, will evoke interest from people around the world, prompting desires for many to share in the benefits of new medical technologies. More than two billion people access the web today; by 2020, experts predict 5 billion will surf the net, and most will want healthier, longer lives.

3) By 2030, synergies from nanotech, biotech, infotech, and cognitive sciences (NBIC) will launch an unprecedented era of human brain-machine connections, which will fuel even more medical research.

4) Scientists at The National Institutes of Health claim that by 2030, non-biological devices will roam through our bodies protecting us from the ravages of most diseases.



5) Author Ray Kurzweil, in “Fantastic Voyage,” says technology will one day enable us to replace every cell in our body with non-biological materials, signaling the end of death from disease. Though ending disease would prevent most deaths, we would still die from accidents and violence.

6) However, during the 2020s, researchers are expected to gain better understanding of the mind, which many believe, by the 2040s, could lead to uploading memories, feelings, and consciousness into a newly cloned body, should disaster strike the old one. We would end life in one body and immediately begin living in another. Our mind would not even be aware that we had died. Should uploading become socially acceptable, death would be no more disruptive than a bee sting.

As wild as this scenario sounds, advances predicted for the years ahead could not only turn this miracle into reality, but with stem cell and genetic procedures expected over the next two decades, many of today’s aging bodies could be patched up, allowing this future to include most people alive today.

I admit that I like my 82 year-old body. It has served me quite well through the years and still carries me around like a spry 60-something. However, if given the chance to live an indefinite lifespan in a healthy, youthful “super body”, I’d take it in a nanosecond. Comments welcome.


Dick Pelletier was a weekly columnist who wrote about future science and technologies for numerous publications. He passed away on July 22, 2014.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (5068) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


First of all, congratulations on making it to double my age and spending it doing real good for humanity in general!

I think that extending lifespan is a vastly good thing in that it will make a lot of people think of the mid and long term consequences of their actions.

The only downside I can see from this would be if this tech were available to those in primitive, religious cultures that value fecundity as a sign of devotion towards their gods that has for whatever reason rejected mental augmentation.

This will lead to the earth becoming vastly overpopulated to soylent green levels with all the fun resource wars that are sure to follow as matter may be practically unlimited with recycling and replicator tech but actual square footage will always be a premium until we can shift mars and venus into the habitible zone and do some serious terraforming. But by that time it will be too darn late.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Celebrating Love and Light: 10 Holiday Tips for the Post-Religious

Previous entry: How to Slow Down Your Perception of Time

HOME | ABOUT | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
35 Harbor Point Blvd, #404, Boston, MA 02125-3242 USA
Email: director @ ieet.org