Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe to: Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Blog feeds Twitter IEET Wiki



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

How I help transgender teens become who they want to be

Science and Democracy

National Geographic Investigates the Future of Food

Lucy Movie (2014)

War Is Good for Us, Dumb New Book Claims

Will sex workers be replaced by robots? (A Precis)


ieet books

Between Ape and Artilect: Conversations with Pioneers of AGI and Other Transformative Technologies
Author
by Ben Goertzel ed.


comments

rmk948 on 'War Is Good for Us, Dumb New Book Claims' (Apr 20, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 19, 2014)

rmk948 on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'War and Human Evolution' (Apr 19, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'War and Human Evolution' (Apr 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Technological Growth and Unemployment:  A Global Scenario Analysis

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


The Singularity Is Further Than It Appears
Mar 27, 2014
(15057) Hits
(8) Comments

Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Mar 30, 2014
(12090) Hits
(3) Comments

Quest for immortality spurs breakthroughs in human-machine merge
Apr 6, 2014
(6345) Hits
(1) Comments

Shape-shifting claytronics: wild future here by 2020, experts say
Mar 24, 2014
(5465) Hits
(2) Comments



IEET > Life > Innovation > Vision > Bioculture > Technoprogressivism > Virtuality

Print Email permalink (3) Comments (2267) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Studying Brain-to-Computer Interfaces Only on Humans: with great results!



Gerwin Schalk

Albany Medical Center

Posted: Dec 19, 2012


Brain to computer interfaces that can actually tell you what people are thinking. The brain detail is said to be “amazing” today and is rapidly growing to understand how the brain functions. They can now tell from brain signals if one moves a hand to the left or to right, etc. The team says they have no clue how far this technology will go, only the future will tell.

Instead of experimenting on animals this team is working purely on understanding the human brain through the use of studying only on humans.

 

 


Listen/View


Print Email permalink (3) Comments (2268) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


"Brain to computer interfaces that can actually tell you what people are thinking" Really? I only know of interfaces that can read what we perceive (external visual information) and what we are intending our muscles to do (motor cortex). I think calling these things "thought" is a stretch, because then you could read someone's "thoughts" just by feeling the tension in their muscles, or reading nerve info in the PNS or optic nerves. What does it mean for someone to think "EE", is it a specific and slight tension in mouth, tongue and diagram? Is it the result of sonic mental imagery? Is it the the memory recall of a sound? These claims are not meaningful without knowing the answers to these questions, and AFAIK we don't.

If there is a working system that reads thoughts (like the content of working memory, or an imagined visual image) then please post a link!



I am 99.99 percent against animal testing.

However, with that said, check out these links:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/471786.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGsRoocMHAA

However I agree that to really read the brain 100% and communicate its qualia we will need advanced technologies, maybe even nano-bots that can pass the blood-brain-barrier and send signals to a computer.



I agree that animal studies are unethical. The only way to get the spatial and temporal resolution required for these studies is highly invasive and animal is destroyed afterwards.

I checked out the first link but don't have time right now to watch the BBC doc. I was not aware of thalamus recordings of visual perception. FYI as far as I understand it the thalamus routes pretty much all cortical activity, so its slightly unclear how easy it would be to find the visual parts alone. It is interesting in that the thalamus is implicated in consciousness.

The reason why the brain-reading studies are motor and sensory based is because that is how they correlate the brain activity with an objectively observable aspect (map VC activity to a perceptual image, or map motor activity to muscle movement of EMG).

If the case of self-speech (and other thoughts) we have no objectively observable feature to correlate the brain activity with. Sure you could tell a person to say something specific in their head over and over again, but there are still lots of variables, in what voice is it said? How fast is it said? Accent? Volume? Distance? We know our brains are active all the time, so its unclear what aspects of that activity is conscious and what aspects are not, so separating out conscious from unconscious thought would be tricky to say the least. Just think of a Freudian slip case, a person thinks they are saying one thing, but their mouths are saying another. How would brain-reading tell which one is the "thought"?

This is a key methodological problem with any "thought" reading.

My main criticism of these studies is that we already have a highly evolved system that interfaces the brain with the external world (technologies and other people), its the PNS. It is so effective that we are hardly aware of it mediating our thoughts. These studies seem to miss the whole realization that cognition is embodied. Reading the PNS (EMG, etc.) directly has many massive advantages to reading the brain directly. Its not not as cool because it does not subscribe to the sci-fi brain in the jar idea.



YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: #12 Andrej Pejic - Androgynous Model - heralding a post-gender future?

Previous entry: Will the elderly be taken care of by robots?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376