Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

David Gunkel on Robots and Cyborgs

Should Couples Who Want Healthy Babies Deliberately Expose Themselves to Zika

Robot Overlordz - Emerging Citizens & Cyborgs

BREXIT – some historical perspective

Bio-Cryptoeconomy: Nanorobotic DACs for Cell Repair and Enhancement

3 moons and a planet that could have alien life

ieet books

Philosophical Ethics: Theory and Practice
John G Messerly


instamatic on 'BREXIT – some historical perspective' (Aug 31, 2016)

almostvoid on 'BREXIT – some historical perspective' (Aug 31, 2016)

instamatic on 'The Science of Fear-Mongering: How to Protect Your Mind from Demagogues' (Aug 29, 2016)

instamatic on 'No Mans Sky: A Deist Simulated Universe' (Aug 29, 2016)

Giulio Prisco on 'No Mans Sky: A Deist Simulated Universe' (Aug 29, 2016)

instamatic on 'No Mans Sky: A Deist Simulated Universe' (Aug 28, 2016)

ooHOOhh on 'Top 5 Myths About Monsanto (Part 1)' (Aug 27, 2016)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Op-ed: Climate Change Is the Most Urgent Existential Risk
Aug 7, 2016
(5886) Hits
(4) Comments

Shedding Light on Peter Thiel’s Dark Enlightenment
Aug 15, 2016
(5225) Hits
(2) Comments

Consciousness, Reality, and the Simulation Hypothesis
Aug 4, 2016
(5176) Hits
(15) Comments

Interview with Gerd Leonhard and his New Book TECHNOLOGY vs. HUMANITY
Aug 23, 2016
(3761) Hits
(0) Comments

IEET > Rights > Disability > Personhood > Life > Access > Enablement > Innovation > Neuroscience > Health > Vision > Sociology > Philosophy > Futurism > Technoprogressivism > Contributors > Alexey Matveyevich Olovnikov

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (1727) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Gerontological Manifesto

Alexey Matveyevich Olovnikov
By Alexey Matveyevich Olovnikov
Longevity for All

Posted: Feb 2, 2016

The necessity to create various remedies for degenerative age-related diseases is beyond any doubts. But this process is somewhat like a Sisyphean task, because the aging of each person only deepens over time, persistently destroying the results of treatment. Pharma is forced to deal with the countless consequences, rather than with their cause. The primary cause of aging is still deeply buried in gerontological terra incognita. Meanwhile, a growing and imminent new threat for humankind is becoming increasingly apparent. This threat is the increasing aging of the human population as a whole.

The menace to the society is in the ongoing change in the ratio of the able-bodied and the disabled-bodied populations in the advanced countries. This trend may lead to the numerical superiority of disabled old persons already by the middle of the 21st century. According to the current estimates, the medical expenses on non-communicable diseases for the period 2010-2030 will be $47 trillion by 2030, with two thirds of this sum to be linked to the costs of the elderly healthcare. ( A solution to this problem by attracting young migrants only shifts the burden of care to the countries of exodus. If no action is taken to radically enhance the ongoing studies in the field of aging biology, this problem will became a burden unbearable for our civilization: Humanity will not be able to maintain the elderly people! The solution to such a gerodemographic situation, the potentially fatal and vitally important problem, can be achieved only through a radical slowing down of the pace of the aging process, or by stopping it! And this can be done only via the discovery of the primary causes of aging that still remain elusive. The search for medicines against degenerative diseases of aging and the studies of the primary mechanism(s) of aging are two related but clearly independent tasks. The striving to the radical slowing down of aging is as important today as the struggle against infectious pandemics was in the past. Even under the most favorable scenario, several decades will be spent until finding the conditions for the radical slowing down of mammalian aging (and for the subsequent translation of the results to the clinic). But within the next several decades, the number of disabled elderly people in the developed countries can exceed the number of able-bodied adults.

The favorable resolution of this unprecedented historic challenge can be found only in case of the unprecedented concentration of intellectual and financial efforts in a new life extension project. The enemy, that has quietly crept up onto our civilization, is quite capable of either destroying the basic moral values (in the way of forced absence of care for the elderly), or undermining the financial foundations of the society (in the way of the back-breaking costs of servicing the elderly). A more likely scenario is that it will do both! The non-biological alternatives to the ongoing efforts in biology and medicine are the robots, but they are not ready to take the frail portion of mankind on their iron shoulders. But even with the robots, the humans would hardly have forgotten their oldest dream – the dream of a significant life extension. Non-aging or delayed aging in essence means the potential for a very long healthy life. A potential critic may argue that a very long healthspan will lead to overpopulation. However the answer to this objection is known. The experience of birth control on the large state scale has already been gained, albeit with other goals. It is of course possible to leave everything as it is, so that life itself will put everything in its place. Life will do it, but at the cost of mass misery and huge losses. Are those necessary or can be avoided by human effort?

And finally we should note one of the most formidable companions of aging – cancer. It is known that, after sexual maturity, cancer incidence increases exponentially with age (de Magalhães JP. How ageing processes influence cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 May;13(5):357-65.). Why? According to a widespread view, occasional changes in chromosomal DNA accumulate as long as there will appear some fatal mutations. However, there are some facts that do not fit into such a simple scheme, and therefore, a generally accepted theory of cancer origin is still absent. There are reasons to suppose that the genuine cause of this multiform pathology is the non-mutational flaws in the functioning of a special, so called chronographic, mechanism. This hypothetical mechanism directs the timely sequential changes of the body structures (hence, it directs the control over the biological age of an individual organism) in the course of the development, maturation and aging of multicellular organisms (Olovnikov A.M.Chronographic Theory of Development, Aging, and Origin of Cancer: Role of Chronomeres and Printomeres. Current Aging Science, 2015, Vol. 8, No.1, 76-88.). Non-mutational errors, which rarely occur during the functioning of this mechanism changing the age, can lead to a loss of proper genetic control in some cells. Only after that, the progeny of these cells begins to obtain and accumulate mutations which eventually can give rise to a malignant growth. If so, the delaying of aging can bring another nice bonus – the prevention of cancer. The sooner we will get this bonus, the better for all of us.

Alexey Matveyevich Olovnikov graduated from Moscow State University, and received his PhD in Immunochemistry at the Gamaleya Institute for Epidemology and Microbiology of Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR in 1966, when he worked in Department of immunology and oncology of this institute (Head of Dept. was Prof. Lev A. Zilber and scientific supervisor was Prof. Aron E. Gurvich); theme of Ph.D. thesis was “The detection of antigens and antibodies using immunosorbents”.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (1728) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


To calculate health issues as a humongous waste of money misses the point as long as we spend just as much on weapons and armies which are totally non productive. Anyway as for the aging population the robots along with nano-apps will fix that quick smart. As productive units. Then all the -isms will vanish as money becomes meaningless so health costs will be 0. Voila!

YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Death is an Ultimate Evil

Previous entry: Cyborg Art- Prefigurative, Performative, Inhuman, Hybrid?


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @