About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


Making the Visible Invisible

Michael Phelps: ‘Naturally’ transhuman

Governing Emerging Technologies

Interview with Dr. Steel

Human Dignity?

Recent Comments


Amy on 'Interview with Dr. Steel' (2008 08 19)

Lou Valetine on 'Human Dignity?' (2008 08 18)

Sandri on 'Intelligence and Empathy' (2008 08 15)

David Olivier on 'Saving Human Rights from the Human Racists' (2008 08 14)

director on 'Saving Human Rights from the Human Racists' (2008 08 14)




IEET Fora


Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)

Jimmy_Adams: Intergenerational Behaviours (1)

Jimmy_Adams: Immigration and Retirement (1)



"The ultimate end of all revolutionary social change is to establish the sanctity of human life, the dignity of man, the right of every human being to liberty and well-being."
--Emma Goldman



TechEthics News


Andy featured on gene doping at Olympics

Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Fellows > Andy Miah

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Andy Miah in The Globe and Mail


Posted: Dec 7, 2005

IEET Fellow Andy Miah has been mentioned in an article about engineered athletes in The Globe and Mail


Like Prof. Mureika, Prof. Miah, a lecturer in media, bioethics and cyber-culture, thinks that the idea of a “natural” record is artificial or obsolete.

“We have to start again with thinking through human limits. Rather than see them in isolation, understand them as functioning in collaboration with technology. Enhancing the performance of athletes in this way should not be seen as cheating, but a fundamental part of what sports are all about.

“In fact, these [supposed natural] limits have already been passed. A middle-distance runner’s achievement takes place on a fine-tuned running track with space-age running shoes.”

If the progress of records is itself important, “then it is not morally bad for athletes to ‘cheat’ nature,” Prof. Miah reasons.

In fact, he offers on the Internet (http://www.GMathletes.net) an argument for genetically modified athletes, suggesting that cheating via doping raises more moral and health concerns than the improvement of performance via genetic modification.

Link


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Is a Doomsday Catastrophe Likely?

Previous entry: Learning Ethics from Science Fiction

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376