IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


Emergence - IEET News for May 15, 2008

Bionic Athletes stepping out of the debate and in to action

The Singularity is not what you think

Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass

Is life a gift?

Recent Comments


JANUSZ CZOCH on 'Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass' (2008 05 14)


Michael Bone on 'Is life a gift?' (2008 05 14)


PhotoFan on 'Longevity Dividend Seminar Talks' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'And the Disabled Shall Inherit the Earth' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'Organization and Information at the Bedside (dissertation)' (2008 05 14)


IEET Fora


Thoughtsurfer: Trans movies poll (1)



"The future looks extremely bright indeed, with lots of possibilities ahead -- big possibilities. Like the song says, We've just begun."
Bruce Lee, martial artist



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Security > Directors > Nick Bostrom

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Welcome to a world of exponential change


Nick Bostrom

Nick Bostrom


Better Humans? The politics of human enhancement and life extension. Demos. London, UK. 2006. (Chapter 3)


Posted: Feb 9, 2006

For most of human history, the pace of technological development was so slow that a person might be born, live out a full human life and die without having perceived any appreciable change. In those times, worldly affairs appeared to have a cyclical nature. Tribes flourished and languished, bad rulers came and went, empires expanded and fell apart in seemingly never-ending loops of creation and destruction.

To the extent that there was a direction or destination to all this striving, it was commonly thought to lie outside time altogether, in the realm of myth or supernatural intervention. A present day observer, by contrast, expects to see significant technological change within a time span as short as a decade and much less in certain sectors. Yet although the external factors of the human condition have been profoundly transformed and continue to undergo rapid change, the internal factors – our basic biological capacities – have remained more or less constant throughout history.

We still eat, sleep, defecate, fornicate, see, hear, feel, think and age in pretty much the same ways as the contemporaries of Sophocles did. But we may now be approaching a time when this will no longer be so.

To read the rest of this article, click here to download the PDF from Demos.


Nick Bostrom Ph.D. is a philosopher at Oxford University, the Director of the Oxford Future of Humanity Institute, and the Chair of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. He co-founded the World Transhumanist Association in 1998 and is a frequent spokesperson and commentator in the media.

permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS

You'll find a slightly different, and hopefully more interesting, take on the issue here http://federation.g3z.com/FedSeries/TV04/01.htm#Section2 capped off by a clear and decisive counterpoint to the question raised: http://federation.g3z.com/FedSeries/TV04/02.htm Both of these are part of the supplement to the "Fourth Wave" presentation at 2004 TransVision. There are two implicit points & questions underlying the sections: (1) the essential parallel to Toffler's Future Shock, which incredibly seems to go entirely unnoticed, even though the entire Transhumanism movement is, in fact, little more than an outgrowth of the above-mentioned "helter-skelter breaks loose" undertone of the book; (2) the inevitable link that arises between the rate at which history is progressing and the total number of years lived by everyone in any given year. I proposed that people-years could actually be taken as a measure of the speed of history. This equates the average contribution of each individual to the overall process, the proportionality being independent of time and place. The punchline, of course, is seen on the 2nd page -- the 1989 inflection point' which, given the forgoing, means the "singularity" is, indeed, nothing more than a phase transition; and one that's about to crest. Actual states on the total number of "people years" can be seen at http://federation.g3z.com/Population/Curve.htm which is a supplement both to the pages above and to the book, Progeny, under development: http://federation.g3z.com/FedSeries/Progeny/Index.htm

YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Man and Machines

Previous entry: Demos's book on the politics of human enhancement

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376