Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view









Personhood Beyond the Human Conference whats new at ieet
How the Catholic Bishops Outsmarted Washington Voters

Apple Pie May Be American, But Apple Computer Isn’t - Not Anymore

Backing into Eden: Chapter 1 &2 – We are Responsible / The Beasts of the Field

Futurist Jamais Cascio envisions a sustainable, resilient world

What’s the Rational Choice? Risk, Values and the Politics of Geoengineering

Prison Industrial Complex in America

Engineering the Future: Geoengineering

The American prison system

Fighting Facebook, a Campaign for a People’s Terms of Service

Imagination Experiment: Visualizing Transformative Tech


ieet books

eGods: Faith versus Fantasy in Computer Gaming
Author
by William Sims Bainbridge


comments

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013)

Henry Bowers on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013)

Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 23, 2013)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Life in the 2040s: nanofactories, flying cars, household robots, more
by Dick Pelletier
Apr 30, 2013
(6506) Hits
(1) Comments

Ten Responses to the Technological Unemployment Problem
by Jon Perry
May 1, 2013
(5549) Hits
(2) Comments

Organ, tissue replacement could end aging by mid-2020s
by Dick Pelletier
May 14, 2013
(3381) Hits
(1) Comments

Noam Chomsky on Libertarians
Andy80o
Apr 27, 2013
(3226) Hits
(15) Comments

Radical life extension: living a 1,000 year lifespan
by Dick Pelletier
May 7, 2013
(2844) Hits
(0) Comments

Imagine No Religion. On Facebook.
by Valerie Tarico
May 4, 2013
(2756) Hits
(150) Comments



IEET > Rights > Disability > Neuroethics > Life > Access > Enablement > Innovation > Implants > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Fellows > David Brin

Print Email permalink (3) Comments (2397) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


Human Evolution: Speeding? Splitting? Borging?... and a dozen Olympics?


David Brin
David Brin
Contrary Brin

Posted: Aug 8, 2012

A number of recent web-notables all seem to revolve (eccentrically) around the question of human evolution.  Whether it continues…

Whether there is such a thing as “selection in groups.” Whether our technological (cyborg) augmentations and/or increasing numbers of “non-neuro-typical” society members portend a new splitting of human destiny. And it looks as if I should have set Existence just five years in the future, instead of 35!

For starters, see a short futuristic film by Eran May-raz and Daniel Lazo about the “game-ification” of everything. They reveal a near future world very much like the one illustrated in my new novel, a very close tomorrow when you’ll overlay reality with meta-information…

...only, instead of using it to solve problems or join “smart mobs” as I depict in a focused drama… some folks will apply such tech in different ways, turning every act, even cooking an egg, into an opportunity for “point-scoring.”   Both cool and kinda chilling, it’s a thought-provoking little film. These challenges to human wisdom and coping ability will continue piling up.

Anodyne for Anecdotes:  Need a counter-riff to volley back at your friends who gullibly send you forwarded nonsense via email or social media? Disinformation, rumors, assertions and “anecdotes” that are easily disproved? (One end of the American political spectrum now uses only assertions, allegories and anecdotes and has achieved the miracle of becoming nearly 100% fact free. The other political wing seems to be constantly toying with the temptation to follow suit—heaven help us if/when they do!)

For a tonic, send your “FWD: emailers” this cogent essay, Dissing the Information, about the ancient, gracious and adult art of fact-checking in this modern era.  Will it accomplish anything?  Yes!  The idiots won’t read it or learn anything or stop FWD-spamming their friends with nonsense.  But they will take you off their “FWD: list.”

Apparently we are speciating, folks, between those of us still capable of prefrontal lobe usage and Homo gullibility.  

And if you believe that…

...see a fascinating - if challenging - discourse by the eminent scholar Steven Pinker about the fallacies of most notions of “group selection” in evolution theory. I don’t agree with him on all counts, but it is a feast of clear thinking.

But nature follows many paths. One of the themes in Existence, explicitly stated by several characters, is the question of speedups in human evolution. It might be argued that one of these happened about 35,000 years ago, when suddenly Homo sapiens began drawing cave art, burying their dead and expanded their tool sets by more than ten-fold. I contend similar changes happened with the introduction of beer, and then towns, and the Renaissance-Enlightenment. My new novel attempts to explore this concept from many angles, both pro and con.

And it seems I am not the only one. In this TED talk, Will our kids be a different species?  Juan Enriquez sweeps across time and space to bring us to the present moment — and shows how technology is revealing evidence that suggests rapid evolution may be under way.

Speaking of (sub) speciation:  During the nine years it took for me to write Existence, I grew increasingly convinced that the phenomenon of “autistic spectrum” - ranging from deep autism to Aspergers to simply way-nerdy - would become ever-more significant in future years.  Not only because the spectrum appears to be manifesting more often (some call it a “plague”), but also as technologies enable folks who were once isolated and victimized to connect with one another, form interest groups, alliances, pool resources and match skills.  I portray this becoming a powerful force by the year 2050…

...and now it appears that others agree. Steve Silberman, a longtime contributing editor at Wired will soon be publishing a book, Neurotribes: Thinking Smarter About People Who Think Differently, which argues that non-neurotypicals will play an ever-growing role in society.  See a fascinating article about this at io9: How Autism is changing the world for everyone. io9.com is increasingly the go-to site for all things future and science-fictional.

Diverging Humanity: Olympics Edition!

With the start of the Olympics, one may ask: Will Athletes ever stop breaking new records?  Or will they continue to grow stronger, better, faster…as we approach the biomechanical limits of the human body.  Niven and Barnes portrayed one possibility in Achilles’ Choice... that beefed up and drug-accelerated and e-hypered athletes would be given their own, separate olympics in which they could burn themselves out achieving short lives but glorious ones.

In contrast, Daniel Wilson’s Amped shows a near future wherein a frightened public over-reacts and legislates against those who get “amplified” with implants. What has already happened?  The Special Olympics offers a venue for the disabled to show off how hard they have developed… “despite.”  

Meanwhile, some regular folks are terrified of double amputees who are doing amazing things with those “sproing” legs.  See Aimee Mullins in her amazing TED talk “My twelve sets of legs.”

My expectation?  It will be a case of “all of the above.” Arguments over where to draw the lines between these groups.  But not much of a fight over whether there should be venues for all of them!  Including… ironically, a new Olympics level that will return to the roots, and be severely drug-tested and rigorously vetted, so that it is only for… amateurs.

Very interesting… and scary: Can Neuroscience Cure Gaming’s Gun Obsession? One researcher wants to use MRI machines to watch video game players and explore how developers can exploit the human brain’s dopamine pleasure-reward circuitry to hook players, and suggests that game developers would not want to light up the striatum constantly in some kind of sensory overload, but believes games could be developed to target players’ emotions with scientific accuracy. Read the article by Lee Hall.


David Brin Ph.D. is a scientist and best-selling author whose future-oriented novels include Earth, The Postman, and Hugo Award winners Startide Rising and The Uplift War. David's newest novel - Existence - is now available, published by Tor Books."
Print Email permalink (3) Comments (2398) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


These are some very interesting articles/sci-fi works.  I found the articles about autism very encouraging being that I’m autistic myself.  The short film you gave a link to was very interesting (and a little chilling as well) like you said and in some was probable (hopefully not the mind control part at the end, otherwise there would be a whole bunch of ethical issues).  Though I personally would want to have pop-ups in my vision all the time (I have a hard enough time getting catchy songs out of my head).  Sense this article involves human evolution and short films, I think you would really enjoy this new short film “Love Like Aliens” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWoudbndXbw). Here’s the synopsis:
In a future not too far from now, humanity has advanced to a point where the line between Homo Sapiens and Androids have blurred completely. This has occurred so that the species could survive. Technology has allowed humans to travel into deep space to colonize other planets and galaxies deep in the universe because Earth has become uninhabitable. One of the many unfortunate results of this robotic Darwinism is that human behavior and consciousness has also changed over the years. Much of what makes one human—love, family, intimacy etc., have all become things of the past. Almost legend…

It may be something worth posting on this site.





“One of the many unfortunate results of this robotic Darwinism is that human behavior and consciousness has also changed over the years. Much of what makes one human—One of the many unfortunate results of this robotic Darwinism is that human behavior and consciousness has also changed over the years. Much of what makes one human—love, family, intimacy etc., have all become things of the past., have all become things of the past.”


You wrote of this before and are right to bring it up again. In the years since 9-11, it gradually dawned on me we have less to lose than previously thought; incidentally, what is war?: A part of the intense dislocation of modern change. In the ‘50s one might have wanted to hold on tight to love, family, intimacy etc—however today they are not what they once were. Chris, I’m deep down so backward-looking I’d like to freeze time but even I know time and tide wait for no man and no family.
Utopianism fails because we all move on in one way or another. And, frankly, people don’t give up their power- they just shift to a different mode.. so IMO such indicates we have less to lose than ever before.





Chris,
sorry to botch your quote; at any rate here is a quote from Extropy-Chat, one that has had me thinking all week. Will include the entire msg. So as not to quote out of context the entire msg. is included below, with that which is IMO the most intriguing:

“I completely agree with you, that we need more energy, and more believers, or converts, if you will.  We can’t do anything, alone.  The bottom line is, many people have mistaken working hypothosis, so are pushing in the wrong direction, or failing to push in the right direction.  It’s simply a matter of they lack proper moral knowledge, and are thereby not choosing what they really want. Most cryonicists think the arguments that converted them, will convert everyone else, and spout mostly just that.  I think that is another big problem, as everyone is very different.  You’ve got to fully understand and work within the current beliefs of others, before you can hope to help them see something better. Also, in my opinion, I think you are grossly mistaken, and wasting significant amounts on any efforts towards “reversal of aging”, which will basically get us nothing.  (i.e. we’ll still have accidents that will kill us, and all the other problems that go along with having a primitive dumb minimalistic brain, even if it doesn’t age.)
We simply need to discover what consciousness is, and then duplicate it, and copy it trillians of times - solving ALL of our problems, not just curing some trivial aging problem of some soon to be very outdated and primitive platform we’re all about to completely abandon.  Any work spent on that is a complete immoral waist of time, in my opinion. Again, in my opinion, your mistaken beliefs are killing us, and many others, because it causes you to waste time on the wrong thing. The bottom line is, we’ve got to amplify the moral intelligence and wisdom of everyone (maybe I’m morally mistaken also?), so everyone can
intelligently make the right choices. And the best way to do that is first, find out what everyone currently
does believe, and value, and why. Then you need to giveeveryone the ability to survey their chosen experts, to see what they say we should do (experts, no matter who, will always be more intelligent than lay populations.)  And we need to measure for what people believe, and know why, so we can better convert them, from within their reference, or set
of values. In other words, we need to provide a way for all the experts to measure for how well their arguments are working, or not, and find out what it would take to convert people to better behavior, using their current values, not ours, sooner, and focus on getting that. In other words, everything we’re trying to do at canonizer.com. By the way, check out the new “Amplifying the Wisdom of the Crowd: Building, and Measuring for Expert and Moral Consensus” paper by James Carol, linked to on the front page of Canaonizer.com. It’s all about knowing, concisely and quantitatively, what everyone else wants.  And measuring that, so it can improve. If the experts can measure all that, concisely and quantitatively, for everyone,  then improving it and eventually getting it all, for and with everyone will
be trivial. As long as people believe they want to die, or never age in some primitive platform, that’s where we’ll continue to be heading.  I know what it will take to convince me, I’m already converted.  The question is, what do you currently believe, and what will it take to convert you, and everyone else, or visa versa?
Brent Allsop”

 





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: ‪Aubrey de Grey With Dr Krystal at Embiggen Books‬

Previous entry: Singularity Summit Australia 2012 Promotional Video

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376