Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

All the Global Catastrophic Risks Talks Online

Pleasure’s perils: Why the ‘sex chip’ may not be such a good idea

The Implications Of An Increasingly Automated Economy

Aspirational Futurism, Uncertainty and Resilience

Bostrom, de Grey, Rushkoff answer Edge’s Big Question for 2009

comments

Nick on 'Aspirational Futurism, Uncertainty and Resilience' (2009 01 04)

Devkumar Trivedi on 'A True Cure for Human Aging' (2009 01 04)

Christopher Harris on 'Pleasure's perils: Why the 'sex chip' may not be such a good idea' (2009 01 04)

Raee on 'Book Review : Feed by M.T.Anderson' (2009 01 04)

Steve Elliott (alapoet) on 'Pleasure's perils: Why the 'sex chip' may not be such a good idea' (2009 01 04)




ieet forums

Sam G: Transhumanism (5)

jake: Irresitible (1)

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)



"Homo humanus can only maintain itself in poetic resistance against metaphysical reflexes of humanolatry"
Peter Sloterdijk





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv




IEET News Feed

[ieet] Mehlman: Human subjects protections in biomedical enhancement research

[ieet] WaPo: Why predictions are often wrong

[ieet] Howe & Jackson on geo-politics of graying world

[ieet] Annalee on SF & futurism in bad times



Longevity Dividend List

[life] Howe & Jackson on geo-politics of graying world

[life] Morris Johnson's 2009 new year's resolution

Re: [life] The medicalization of Anti-aging , my 2009 new year's resolution ... from morris johnson

[life] The medicalization of Anti-aging , my 2009 new year's resolution ... from morris johnson

[life] Are Older People Happier?

[life] Right is worried US will love universal health care too much



Existential Risks List

[x-risk] Fwd: Onion: Breakthrough To Fix Problems Of Previous Breakthrough

[x-risk] Onion: Breakthrough To Fix Problems Of Previous Breakthrough

[x-risk] Survey finds growing support for geo-engineering

[x-risk] WaPo: Report by 32 Scientists Point to Faster Climate Change

[x-risk] Getting serious about the threat of nuclear terrorism

[x-risk] Onion: Scientists Warn Large Earth Collider May Destroy Earth



Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

[images] Annalee on SF & futurism in bad times

[images] FW: 4th Global Conference: Visions of Humanity in Cyberculture, Cyberspace and Science Fiction

[images] Transagriculture: Life & Art

[images] CFP - SuperHuman - Melbourne Aus - Nov 22-25, 2009

[images] CFP: Steampunk, Science, and (Neo)Victorian Technologies

[images] Montreal play about transhumanism



Trans-Spirit List

TM reduces stress of ADHD

Yasuhiko Genku Kimura - H+ Buddhist?

Risk-taking - It's the Dopamine

How Can Mindfulness Increase Health or Happiness?

Rule-breaking gene increases popularity

Brain Activity Altered during Religious Experience



Technoprogressive List

Santa Fight

Is Marxism still relevant?

Is Marxism still relevant?

Re: Robert Ingersoll's "What I Want For Christmas" (1897)

Re: Robert Ingersoll's "What I Want For Christmas" (1897)

Re: Robert Ingersoll's "What I Want For Christmas" (1897)


IEET > Security > Fellows > Jamais Cascio

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


You Own Your Own Genes. Now What?


Jamais Cascio

Jamais Cascio


WorldChanging


Posted: Mar 7, 2005

As biomedical technologies get cheaper, it becomes easier for non-specialists to get access to them; as the technologies get "smarter," it becomes easier for non-specialists to use those them. We see this happening with devices such as inexpensive defibrillators, now standard issue on many airplanes, which are sufficiently automated to allow people with no medical knowledge to save the lives of heart attack victims in mid-air. This is pretty clearly a good thing. But we’re also now seeing this happen with genetic testing, and whether or not it’s for the good remains to be determined.

dnadirect.jpgDNA Direct is a San Francisco company founded by Ryan Phelan, who started the website which became WebMD. For a couple hundred dollars, DNA Direct will send you a kit to let you take a sample (typically a cheek swab) and send it back for anonymous testing for genes predisposing you to a variety disorders including, starting this week, breast cancer. Counseling is included with the results, which are delivered via the web. No information gets added to your medical records, no insurance companies get notified. The logic here is straightforward: fear of genetic discrimination could make people avoid taking tests which could help them make lifestyle choices to avoid potential problems. Anonymous testing side-steps that problem neatly.

We know that genes are not destiny -- one's proteome, one's environment, and one's behavior also have a great deal of say in medical outcomes. But even if they aren't predictive, they are suggestive. That's where good counseling can be the most beneficial: understanding which risk factors are meaningful, and which aren't. DNA Direct claims to provide abundant information and counseling resources; some people remain fearful that any over-the-web intervention will be insufficient. And divulging sufficient amounts of information about one's life to make the counseling useful undercuts the anonymity.

DNA Direct (and its inevitable competitors) is another step towards the era of transparent physiology. It will soon be possible to run a full genetic scan of individuals quickly and inexpensively. Down the road, we'll see individual proteomes and brain maps. In the not-too-distant future, you'll be able to carry around a card (or whatever data storage medium is in vogue) containing the component information of you. While there are questions about precisely who would own that data, the real unanswered question is more basic: what would you do with it?

We are moving along quite nicely in the development of data acquisition tools for the world around -- and inside -- us. The development of tools and systems for analyzing that data, telling us what it all means, seems to be moving along less swiftly. What results is not so much "information overload," making it hard to find what you need, but "information overwhelm," making it hard to figure out what's important and what isn't. The real breakthrough with these technologies will come not when it's easier and cheaper than ever to accumulate the data, but when it's easy and inexpensive to understand the data.


Jamais Cascio is a fellow of the IEET, and a professional futurist. He writes the popular blog Open the Future.

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Interview with Ramez Naam

Previous entry: Cozying Up with Deep Blue

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376