Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project





Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Hughes on Ethics in Business and the Health Care Industry

Andy Profiled in The Scotsman

Helen Jaques reviews Nature debate on H+ featuring Miah, de Grey and Warwick

Russell about to publish Voices of Disbelief

Aspergers as Gift

comments

none of your business on 'Intelligent Design Made Mankind?' (2008 11 30)

Smoke on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 11 30)

Inge Wie Nielsen on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 11 28)

Paul Schroeer-Hannemann on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 11 27)

Anthony Robinson on 'Embracing Change with All Four Arms: A Post-Humanist Defense of Genetic Engineering' (2008 11 27)




ieet forums

Sam G: Transhumanism (5)

jake: Irresitible (1)

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)



"Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition."
Isaac Asimov





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Security > Fellows > Jamais Cascio

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


An Eschatological Taxonomy


Jamais Cascio

Jamais Cascio


Open the Future


Posted: Jan 1, 2007

Eschatology: (noun) The study of the end of the world.
Taxonomy: (noun) A classification in a hierarchical system.

What do we mean when we talk about the “end of the world?”



It’s a term that get thrown around a bit too often among a variety of futurist-types, whether talking about global warming, nanofabrication, or non-friendly artificial intelligence. ”Existential risks” is the lingo-du jour, referring to the broad panoply of processes, technologies and events that put our existence at risk. But, still, what does that mean? The destruction of the Earth? The end of humankind? A “Mad Max” world of leather-clad warriors, feral kids, and armed fashion models? All are frightening and horrific, but some are moreso than others. How do we tell them apart?

Here, then, is a first pass at a classification system for the varying types of “end of the world” scenarios.




Class Effect
0Regional Catastrophe (examples: moderate-case global warming, minor asteroid impact, local thermonuclear war)
Global civilization not eliminated, but regional civilizations effectively destroyed; millions to hundreds of millions dead, but large parts of humankind retain current social and technological conditions. Chance of humankind recovery: excellent. Species local to the catastrophe likely die off, and post-catastrophe effects (refugees, fallout, etc.) may kill more. Chance of ecosystem recovery: excellent.
1 Human Die-Back (example: extreme-case global warming, moderate asteroid impact, global thermonuclear war)
Global civilization set back to pre- or low-industrial conditions; several billion or more dead, but human species as a whole survives, in pockets of varying technological and social conditions. Chance of humankind recovery: moderate. Most non-human species on brink of extinction die off, but most other plant and animal species remain and, eventually, flourish. Chance of ecosystem recovery: excellent.
2 Civilization Extinction (examples: worst-case global warming, significant asteroid impact, early-era molecular nanotech warfare)
Global civilization destroyed; millions (at most) remain alive, in isolated locations, with ongoing death rate likely exceeding birth rate. Chance of humankind recovery: slim. Many non-human species die off, but some remain and, over time, begin to expand and diverge. Chance of ecosystem recovery: good.
3a Human Extinction-Engineered (examples: targeted nano-plague, engineered sterility absent radical life extension)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Conditions triggering this are human-specific, so other species are, for the most part, unaffected. Chance of humankind recovery: nil. Chance of ecosystem recovery: excellent.
3b Human Extinction-Natural (examples: major asteroid impact, methane clathrates melt)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Conditions triggering this are general and global, so other species are greatly affected, as well. Chance of humankind recovery: nil. Chance of ecosystem recovery: moderate.
4 Ecosystem Extinction (examples: massive asteroid impact, “iceball Earth” reemergence, late-era molecular nanotech warfare)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Ecosystem massively disrupted, with the wholesale elimination of many niches. Chance of humankind recovery: nil. Chance of ecosystem recovery: slim. Chance of eventual re-emergence of organic life: good.
5 Planetary Extinction (examples: dwarf-planet-scale asteroid impact, nearby gamma-ray burst)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Ecosystem effectively destroyed; all species extinct. Geophysical disruption sufficient to prevent or greatly hinder re-emergence of organic life.
X Planetary Elimination (example: post-Singularity beings disassemble planet to make computronium)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Ecosystem destroyed; all species extinct. Planet itself destroyed.

Suggestions, additions, changes all welcome.



Jamais Cascio is a fellow of the IEET, and a professional futurist. He writes the popular blog Open the Future.

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Idiocy and the Sublime

Previous entry: In Praise of Bio-Happiness (IEET White Paper 02)

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376