Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Technology hasn’t changed love. Here’s why

Why Non-Natural Moral Realism is Better than Divine Command Theory

IEET Affiliate Scholar Steve Fuller Publishes New Article in The Telegraph on AI

Can we build AI without losing control over it?

Blockchain Fintech: Programmable Risk and Securities as a Service

Brexit for Transhumanists: A Parable for Getting What You Wish For

ieet books

Philosophical Ethics: Theory and Practice
John G Messerly


spud100 on 'For the unexpected innovations, look where you'd rather not' (Oct 22, 2016)

spud100 on 'Have you ever inspired the greatest villain in history? I did, apparently' (Oct 22, 2016)

RJP8915 on 'Brexit for Transhumanists: A Parable for Getting What You Wish For' (Oct 21, 2016)

instamatic on 'What democracy’s future shouldn’t be' (Oct 20, 2016)

instamatic on 'Is the internet killing democracy?' (Oct 17, 2016)

RJP8915 on 'The Ethics of a Simulated Universe' (Oct 17, 2016)

Nicholsp03 on 'The Ethics of a Simulated Universe' (Oct 17, 2016)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Here’s Why The IoT Is Already Bigger Than You Realize
Sep 26, 2016
(5972) Hits
(1) Comments

IEET Fellow Stefan Sorgner to discuss most recent monograph with theologian Prof. Friedrich Graf
Oct 3, 2016
(4045) Hits
(0) Comments

Space Exploration, Alien Life, and the Future of Humanity
Oct 4, 2016
(3993) Hits
(1) Comments

All the Incredible Things We Learned From Our First Trip to a Comet
Oct 6, 2016
(3058) Hits
(0) Comments

IEET > Security > Cyber > Rights > Personhood > Vision > Futurism > Fellows > Jamais Cascio

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (5976) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Homesteading a Society of Mind

Jamais Cascio
By Jamais Cascio
Open the Future

Posted: Mar 1, 2011

Scientific American reports about research at Cornell’s Computational Synthesis Laboratory intended to give robot minds a degree of “self-awareness.” Is this a signpost on the road to machine consciousness?

The researchers’ initial version of the program gave the robot a way of watching and analyzing its own body, so that it could more readily adapt to new conditions (such as losing a limb). The next version, however, was much more ambitious:

Now, instead of having robots modeling their own bodies, Lipson and Juan Zagal have developed ones that essentially reflect on their own thoughts. They achieve such thinking about thinking, or metacognition, by placing two minds in one bot. [...] By reflecting on the first controller’s actions, the second one could make changes to adapt to failures… In this way the robot could adapt after just four to ten physical experiments instead of the thousands it would take using traditional evolutionary robotic techniques.

Book coverThey refer to this system of having one controller analyze another as “metacognition,” but what immediately came to mind for me was Marvin Minsky’s description of a “Society of Mind”—the idea that the conscious mind is an emergent process resulting from multiple independent sub-cognitive processes working in parallel.

This piece at MIT gives a better overview of the Society of Mind argument than the Wikipedia stub, including this quote from a Minsky essay on the concept:

The mind is a community of “agents.” Each has limited powers and can communicate only with certain others. The powers of mind emerge from their interactions for none of the Agents, by itself, has significant intelligence. [...] In our picture of the mind we will imagine many “sub-persons”, or “internal agents”, interacting with one another. Solving the simplest problem-seeing a picture-or remembering the experience of seeing it-might involve a dozen or more-perhaps very many more-of these agents playing different roles. Some of them bear useful knowledge, some of them bear strategies for dealing with other agents, some of them carry warnings or encouragements about how the work of others is proceeding. And some of them are concerned with discipline, prohibiting or “censoring” others from thinking forbidden thoughts.

Clearly, a two-“agent” robot mind isn’t quite a real “society of mind”—it’s more like a “neighborly acquaintance of mind.” Nonetheless, it shows an obvious direction for further research, as well as offering interesting support for Minsky’s idea.

It also echoes something I wrote in 2003, for the Transhuman Space: Toxic Memes game book. In discussing why AI “infomorphs” weren’t significantly smarter than humans, I offered up this:

Despite their different material base, human minds and AI minds are remarkably similar in form. Both display consciousness as an emergent amalgam of subconscious processes. For humans, this was first suggested well over a century ago, most famously in the work of Marvin Minsky and Daniel Dennett, and proven by the notorious Jiap Singh “consciousness plasticity” experiments of the 2030s. [..] In the same way, nearly all present-day AI infomorphs use an emergent-mind structure made up of thousands of subminds, each focused on different tasks. There is no single “consciousness” system; thought, awareness, and even sapience emerge from the complex interactions of these subprocesses. Increased intellect… is the result of increasingly complex subsystems.

We’re still a ways away from declaring this a successful predictive hit, but it’s amusing nonetheless.

Jamais Cascio is a Senior Fellow of the IEET, and a professional futurist. He writes the popular blog Open the Future.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (5977) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


The moral, loving observer self behind the rational, self-indulgent ego. Sounds a lot like something that many people think doesn’t exist.

A double minded man is unstable in all of his ways.

YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Is ‘Spirituality’ Necessary?

Previous entry: The Happiest Species on the Planet


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @