Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view









Personhood Beyond the Human Conference whats new at ieet
The American prison system

Fighting Facebook, a Campaign for a People’s Terms of Service

Imagination Experiment: Visualizing Transformative Tech

From Mars to the Multiverse

The singularity: merging human/machine to achieve immortality

Feel the Pulse - 2013 MIT Image Award Winner

CubeSats: Tiny satellites work at MIT, U. Mich.

Should Transhumanists Abandon the Corporatist Capitalist model?

The Far Futures Project

Mixed News from Space


ieet books

eGods: Faith versus Fantasy in Computer Gaming
Author
by William Sims Bainbridge


comments

Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 22, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 22, 2013)

Henry Bowers on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 22, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Should Transhumanists Abandon the Corporatist Capitalist model?' (May 22, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 22, 2013)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Life in the 2040s: nanofactories, flying cars, household robots, more
by Dick Pelletier
Apr 30, 2013
(6452) Hits
(1) Comments

Ten Responses to the Technological Unemployment Problem
by Jon Perry
May 1, 2013
(5456) Hits
(2) Comments

Organ, tissue replacement could end aging by mid-2020s
by Dick Pelletier
May 14, 2013
(3234) Hits
(0) Comments

Noam Chomsky on Libertarians
Andy80o
Apr 27, 2013
(3177) Hits
(15) Comments

Radical life extension: living a 1,000 year lifespan
by Dick Pelletier
May 7, 2013
(2750) Hits
(0) Comments

Imagine No Religion. On Facebook.
by Valerie Tarico
May 4, 2013
(2666) Hits
(150) Comments



IEET > Security > Biosecurity > Eco-gov > Rights > Economic > Life > Health > Vision > Bioculture > Contributors > Lee-Roy Chetty

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2230) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


The Link Between the Environment, Poverty and Development in South Africa


Lee-Roy Chetty
Lee-Roy Chetty
Thought Leader

Posted: Aug 2, 2012

A 2011 World Bank study estimates that environmental wealth accounts for 26 percent of the total wealth of low-income countries. This is contrasted with 13 percent of wealth in middle-income countries and only 2 percent of wealth in OECD countries.

Therefore, investing in sound and equitable environmental management makes good economic sense and is essential to fight poverty because people in developing countries depend directly on natural resources (such as fisheries, pastures, forestry, etc) to earn their livelihoods.

However, increased investment in environmental management alone is not enough. To be effective, investment must also be accompanied by the empowerment of communities, local governments and the private sector to lead the development efforts. Investing in environmental management as well as human capacity could provide the catalyst to benefit the poor and marginalised in developing world countries as well as contributing to the overall enhanced growth in developing economies.

Within a South African context, post 1994, the greatest challenge in terms of rural development has been to reverse the inherited legacy of the marginalisation of the poor in rural regions of our country. This has entailed drastic changes to access to resources (such as land, water, education and skills), rural infrastructure and government services.

18 years in to our democracy, incremental gains have been achieved in terms of the extent and levels of poverty among our rural citizens. According to the 2009 National Income Dynamics study, the rural share of poverty fell from approximately 70 percent in 1993 to 57 percent in 2008. This improved household welfare increase is mainly the result of the large increase in social grant expenditure which has been implemented.

In addition, access to basic services has also improved, however, not at the same rate as that of urban areas in South Africa. Post our democratic dispensation, approximately 6 million hectares of agricultural land have been redistributed – 3.4 million hectares through land redistribution and 2.4 million hectares through the restitution process. And of the 79 696 land claims which have been lodged since 1994, 95 percent of these claims have been settled.

However, even with all the strides made in the last 18 years, rural areas within our country remain riddled with greater poverty and inequality than that of urban areas, with the majority of households trapped in a never-ending cycle of poverty.

According to the National Planning Commission (NPC), by 2030 South Africa’s rural communities should have greater opportunities to participate fully in the economic, social and political life of our country. This could be achieved by citizens having the ability to access high-quality basic services that would enable them to be well nourished, healthy and increasingly skilled. Added to this, rural economies will be supported by agriculture and where possible, mining, tourism, agro-processing and fisheries.

This vision for our rural citizenry includes better integration of our country’s rural areas, which could be achieved through successful land reform, job creation and poverty alleviation. According to the NPC, the driving force behind this vision will be an expansion of irrigated agriculture, supplemented by dry-land production where possible.

In areas of low economic potential, variables such as quality education, health care, basic services and social security will support the development of human capital. Conversely, in areas of mild and high economic potential, non-agricultural activities such as agro-industry, tourism, small enterprises and fisheries will be used to stimulate development.

The vision mapped out above will also need to be supported by ensuring rural citizens have regular access to basic services, as well as ensuring food security and the empowerment of farm workers. Institutional capacities will also be crucial to success, with specific emphasis placed on the reforms required to resolve contested relationships between indigenous and constitutional institutions.

As South Africa approaches the 100th year anniversary of the Land Act of 1913 which formalised the land dispossession of black South Africans, the issue of equitable land redistribution and development will continue to be top of the agenda as well as be an emotional subject matter for many people in our country.


Lee-Roy Chetty holds a masters degree in media studies from the University of Cape Town and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. A two-time recipient of the National Research Fund Scholarship, he is currently completing his PhD at UCT and an economics degree with Unisa.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2231) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


the rural share of poverty fell from approximately 70 percent in 1993 to 57 percent in 2008. This improved household welfare increase is mainly the result of the large increase in social grant expenditure which has been implemented

  So they didn’t got jobs or anything, they got on the state welfare gravy train

This vision for our rural citizenry includes better integration of our country’s rural areas, which could be achieved through successful land reform, job creation and poverty alleviation. According to the NPC, the driving force behind this vision will be an expansion of irrigated agriculture, supplemented by dry-land production where possible.

    Successful land reform means productive white farms are given piecemeal to blacks who proceed to wreck them and end up practicing subsistence agriculture on a small portion while the rest goes fallow (see Zimbabwe). I expect a retraction of irrigated agriculture.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: The Aging but Resilient Brain: Keeping Neurons Happy

Previous entry: Climate Change and Inter-Group Cooperation

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376