Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
George Grant and Transhumanism

What’s Wrong With Transhumanism?

Welcome to 2030

Natasha Vita-More @ SXSW 2010

A Long, Lonely Road

No Handlebars

Fifteen Minutes into the Future

Love’s Labour Lost: An act of desperation leads to a bad law

Health Care Good, System Bad

A Note About Our Comments Policy


comments

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 14, 2010)

postfuturist on 'Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?' (Mar 14, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?' (Mar 14, 2010)

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 14, 2010)

postfuturist on 'Health Care Good, System Bad' (Mar 14, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Security > Directors > Nick Bostrom

PrintEmailpermalink • (1) Comments • (17) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




Bostrom and H+ profiled in CNN


Posted: Jul 16, 2008

CNN’s piece on the upcoming conference on global catastrophic risks at Oxford, organized by IEET Chair Nick Bostrom and Milan Cirkovic, was extraordinarily warm.

Speakers at the four-day event at Oxford University in Britain will talk about topics including nuclear terrorism and what to do if a large asteroid were to be on a collision course with our planet.

On the final day of the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference experts will focus on what could be the unintended consequences of new technologies, such as superintelligent machines that, if ill-conceived, might cause the demise of Homo sapiens.

“Any entity which is radically smarter than human beings would also be very powerful,” said Dr. Nick Bostrom, director of Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, host of the symposium. “If we get something wrong, you could imagine the consequences would involve the extinction of the human species.”

Bostrom is a philosopher and a leading thinker of transhumanism—a movement that advocates not only the study of the potential threats and promises that future technologies could pose to human life but also the ways in which emergent technologies could be used to make the very act of living better.

“We want to preserve the best of what it is to be human and maybe even amplify that,” Bostrom told CNN.

Transhumanists, according to Bostrom, anticipate a coming era where biotechnology, molecular nanotechnologies, artificial intelligence and other new types of cognitive tools to amplify our intellectual capacity, improve our physical capabilities and even enhance our emotional well-being.

The end result would be a new form of “posthuman” life with beings that possess qualities and skills so exceedingly advanced they no longer can be classified simply as humans.

“We will begin to use science and technology not just to manage the world around us but to manage our own human biology as well,” Bostrom told CNN. “The changes will be faster and more profound than the very, very slow changes that would occur over tens of thousands of years as a result of natural selection and biological evolution.”

Bostrom declined to try to predict an exact time frame when this revolutionary biotechnological metamorphosis might occur. “Maybe it will take eight years or 200 years,” he said. “It is very hard to predict.”


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


For centuries now, since early reniassance times, a battle has waged between the would be moral creatures and unstopable progressives. Prior to most great advancements a group of haters and doubters get together and tell everyone else not to make to next step. Galilieo, Columbus and the Wright brothers were all told their vision couldn't be realized. If history teaches us anything it teaches us that while the doubters are doubting someone else is accomplishing thier dream. Christian thinkers say these advances in biotechnology take away from the dignity of humanity. Some like to pull out the-"made in his image"- card. Be that as it may, if God made us in his image wouldn't he want us to be more like him. Preachers will guide thier churches to imitate Christ. Does this only cover the spiritual realm or does that mean we should figure out how to bring dead folks back from the dead. It seems there may be hidden meanings in the waiting for God to show up again.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Against the Empire

Previous entry: Pickering on transhumanism

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376