|
Support the IEET![]() The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future. Via PayPal
Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh? Quick overview of biopolitical points of view ![]()
![]()
Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 25, 2013) CygnusX1 on 'Apple Pie May Be American, But Apple Computer Isn't - Not Anymore' (May 25, 2013) Intomorrow on 'How the Catholic Bishops Outsmarted Washington Voters' (May 24, 2013) Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013) Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013) Subscribe to IEET News ListsDaily News FeedLongevity Dividend ListCatastrophic Risks ListBiopolitics of Popular Culture ListTechnoprogressive ListTrans-Spirit List
Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv
|
|
|

It's interesting that Kurt mentions us deciding what GM species we want to live with. If most of the species living today went extinct (which they probably will in spite of our efforts), would we try to engineer new organisms from the few remaining species to fill critical ecological niches? I can imagine if Jack Horner is successful with his "Chickenosaurus" project that we might use different variants of those to fill niches seeing how successful dinosaurs were. I also wonder if we would desperate enough to take human DNA and create what would be called "Humanimals" to fill roles left by extinct animals (like the ones depicted in Dougal Dixon's "Man After Man"). The latter probably (and hopefully) wont happen due to ethical issues. Then again, its not like we acting out of desperation before.