Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

A Game of Musical Chairs over Hot Coals - an analogy about employment and basic income

Human Brain 2.0 - what is the most essential upgrade? Increased Rationality, Empathy, or Happiness?

Simple Intervention Cuts Unplanned Pregnancy by Half

Basic Income Guarantee in Utrecht, The Netherlands

Basic Income: The Totally Crazy (Not Crazy) Idea

Fermi Paradox, Doomsday Argument, Simulation Hypothesis—is our view of reality seriously flawed?


ieet books

A Dangerous Master: How to Keep Technology from Slipping Beyond Our Control
Author
Wendell Wallach


comments

rmk948 on 'Simple Intervention Cuts Unplanned Pregnancy by Half' (Jun 29, 2015)

James McLean Ledford on 'Is Pope Francis the World’s Most Powerful Transhumanist?' (Jun 29, 2015)

Simon84 on 'I Stand With Peter Singer' (Jun 29, 2015)

rms on 'AI Will Solve Aging - it is a Tool, Not a Threat' (Jun 29, 2015)

rms on 'How To Survive the Robot Apocalypse' (Jun 29, 2015)

Random Sample on 'How To Survive the Robot Apocalypse' (Jun 28, 2015)

instamatic on 'Fort Sumter Redux: the Battle Flag and the Re-ignition of the Confederacy' (Jun 28, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Universal Basic Income—The Foundation of a Technically Advanced Society
Jun 15, 2015
(44961) Hits
(6) Comments

Should Politicians be Replaced by Artificial Intelligence? Interview with Mark Waser
Jun 12, 2015
(18580) Hits
(3) Comments

Will Artificial Intelligence be a Buddha? Is Fear of AI just a symptom of Human Self-Loathing?
Jun 17, 2015
(10855) Hits
(5) Comments

Atheism in Zambia - skeptical, rational thought in a very superstitious country
Jun 23, 2015
(9854) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Life > Fellows > Aubrey de Grey

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4841) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Life extension, human rights, and the rational refinement of repugnance


Aubrey de Grey
By Aubrey de Grey
Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:659-663

Posted: Nov 18, 2005

On the ethics of extending human life: healthy people have a right to carry on living.

Humanity has long demonstrated a paradoxical ambivalence concerning the extension of a healthy human lifespan. Modest health extension has been universally sought, whereas extreme (even indefinite) health extension has been regarded as a snare and delusion—a dream beyond all others at first blush, but actually something we are better off without. The prevailing pace of biotechnological progress is bringing ever closer the day when humanity will be able to act on the latter view by rejecting a clear and present opportunity for much longer healthy lives. Indeed, some biogerontologists (including myself) contend that that day has already arrived, to the extent that our hesitation in embarking on a vigorous “war on ageing” is already delaying the point at which a cure for ageing will be developed. Here I consider whether our present caution concerning the wisdom of truly curing ageing is likely to survive the increased scrutiny that it will receive in coming years as a result of these technical advances. I conclude that it will not, because of its irreconcilability with values that are more deeply held by the large majority of humanity than any values that argue against the quest for a cure. I further conclude that all the major current reasons given for not curing ageing are mere crutches to help us cope with the immutability of ageing that we have been brought up to accept. Our failure to set aside such irrationality (as it has become with recent advances in biomedical gerontology, even if it was justifiable on psychological grounds hitherto) is already shortening potential longevity—quite probably of those already alive today—to a staggering degree. Once we realise this, our determination to consign human ageing to history will be second only to our shame that we took so long to break out of our collective trance.

To read the rest of this article please visit http://jme.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/31/11/659


Aubrey de Grey Ph.D. is a biomedical gerontologist, a Fellow of the IEET, the Chief Science Officer of the SENS Foundation and editor of Rejuvenation Research.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4842) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Genetically modified athletes

Previous entry: Intelligent Design Made Mankind?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376