Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view









Personhood Beyond the Human Conference whats new at ieet
What’s the Rational Choice? Risk, Values and the Politics of Geoengineering

Prison Industrial Complex in America

Engineering the Future: Geoengineering

The American prison system

Fighting Facebook, a Campaign for a People’s Terms of Service

Imagination Experiment: Visualizing Transformative Tech

From Mars to the Multiverse

The singularity: merging human/machine to achieve immortality

Feel the Pulse - 2013 MIT Image Award Winner

CubeSats: Tiny satellites work at MIT, U. Mich.


ieet books

eGods: Faith versus Fantasy in Computer Gaming
Author
by William Sims Bainbridge


comments

dobermanmac on 'The singularity: merging human/machine to achieve immortality' (May 23, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 23, 2013)

SHaGGGz on 'Prison Industrial Complex in America' (May 23, 2013)

Intomorrow on 'The American prison system' (May 22, 2013)

Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 22, 2013)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Life in the 2040s: nanofactories, flying cars, household robots, more
by Dick Pelletier
Apr 30, 2013
(6466) Hits
(1) Comments

Ten Responses to the Technological Unemployment Problem
by Jon Perry
May 1, 2013
(5484) Hits
(2) Comments

Organ, tissue replacement could end aging by mid-2020s
by Dick Pelletier
May 14, 2013
(3262) Hits
(1) Comments

Noam Chomsky on Libertarians
Andy80o
Apr 27, 2013
(3194) Hits
(15) Comments

Radical life extension: living a 1,000 year lifespan
by Dick Pelletier
May 7, 2013
(2766) Hits
(0) Comments

Imagine No Religion. On Facebook.
by Valerie Tarico
May 4, 2013
(2693) Hits
(150) Comments



IEET > Life > Implants > Vision > Virtuality > Directors > George Dvorsky

Print Email permalink (3) Comments (3704) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


Welcome to the Machine, Part 4: Kurzweil’s nano neural nets


George Dvorsky
George Dvorsky
Sentient Developments

Posted: Apr 17, 2009

As previously noted in this series, our entire world may be simulated. For all we know we’re sitting on a powerful supercomputer somewhere, the mere playthings of posthuman intelligences. But this is not the only possibility. There’s another way that this kind of fully immersive ‘reality’ could be realized—one that doesn’t require the simulation of an entire world. Indeed, it’s quite possible that your life is not what it seems—that what you think of as reality is actually an illusion of the senses. You could be experiencing a completely immersive and totally convincing virtual reality right now and you don’t even know it.

How could such a thing be possible? Nanotechnology, of course.

The nano neural net

In his book, The Singularity is Near,  futurist Ray Kurzweil describes how a nanotechnology powered neural network could give rise to the ultimate virtual reality experience. By suffusing the brain with specialized nanobots, he speculates that we will someday be able to override reality and replace it with an experience that’s completely fabricated. And all without the use of a single brain jack.

Here’s how:

First, we have to remember that all sensory data we experience is converted into electrical signals that the brain can process. The brain does a very good job of this, and we in turn experience these inputs as subjective awareness (namely through consciousness and feelings of qualia); our perception of reality is therefore nothing more than the brain’s interpretation of incoming sensory information.

Now imagine that you could stop this sensory data at the conversion point and replace it with something else.

That’s where the nano neural net comes in. According to Kurzweil, nanbots would park themselves near every interneuronal connection coming in from our senses (sight, hearing, touch, balance, etc.). They would then work to 1) halt the incoming sensory signals (not difficult—we already know how to use “neuron transistors” that can detect and suppress neuronal firing) and 2) replace these inputs with the signals required to support a believable virtual reality environment (a bit more challenging).

As Kurzweil notes, “The brain does not experience the body directly.” As far as the conscious self is concerned, the sensory data would completely override the feelings generated by the real environment. The brain would experience the synthetic signals just as it would the real ones.

Generating synthetic experiences

Clearly, the second step—generating new sensory signals—is radically more complicated than the first (not to mention, of course, the difficulty of creating nanobots that can actually work within the brain itself!). Creating and transmitting credible artificial sensory data will be no easy feat. We will need to completely reverse engineer the brain so that we can map all requisite sensory interactions. We’ll also need a fairly sophisticated AI to generate the stream of sensory data that’s needed to create a succession of believable life experiences.

But assuming we can get a nano neural net to work, the sky’s the limit in terms of how we could use it. Kurzweil notes,

You could decide to cause your muscles and limbs to move as you normally would, but the nanobots would intercept these interneuronal signals, suppress your real limbs from moving, and instead cause your virtual limbs to move, appropriately adjusting your vestibular system and providing the appropriate movement and reorientation in the virtual environment.

From there we will create virtual reality experiences as real or surreal as our imaginations allow. We’ll be able to choose different bodies, reside in all sorts of environments and interact with our fellow neural netters. It’ll be an entirely new realm of existence. This new world, with all its richness and possibility, may eventually supplant our very own.

And in some cases, we may even wish to suppress and alter our memories such that we won’t know who we really are and that we’re actually living in a VR environment…

A topic I will explore in more detail in my next post.


George Dvorsky serves as Chair of the IEET Board of Directors and also heads our Rights of Non-Human Persons program. George produces Sentient Developments blog and podcast.
Print Email permalink (3) Comments (3705) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


“And in some cases, we may even wish to suppress and alter our memories such that we won’t know who we really are and that we’re actually living in a VR environment’

A little musing: If you were to search for a doctor to hook you up to a machine and alter your memory such that you won’t know that you’re living in a VR environment, would you want that doctor to first have had the procedure done on him? If so, then wouldn’t it be true that the doctor wouldn’t know what good his machine was for?





When artificial sensory data rises to the level that it delivers a fully immersive sensory experience to the brain that is indistinguishable from real life, there’s nothing “virtual” about it!

http://www.squidoo.com/NeuralReality





The above hypothesised experience by Mr. Kurzweil has already been experienced by me personally. It happened to me.

“You could decide to cause your muscles and limbs to move as you normally would, but the nanobots would intercept these interneuronal signals, suppress your real limbs from moving, and instead cause your virtual limbs to move, appropriately adjusting your vestibular system and providing the appropriate movement and reorientation in the virtual environment.”

So my question is- if there exists another way- As commonly known, Spiritual way- which makes this happen/has happened then why complicate the matter and spend millions of dollars in achieving this?

It is impressive and commendable to see that Mr Kruzweil could think this. Has he experienced this as well? I have a suspicion he might have:). Would love to know.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Jon Kabat Zinn’s Science of Mindfulness

Previous entry: A Black-Swan-Robust World

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376