|
Support the IEET![]() The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future. Via PayPal
Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh? Quick overview of biopolitical points of view ![]()
![]()
Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013) Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 23, 2013) CygnusX1 on 'The singularity: merging human/machine to achieve immortality' (May 23, 2013) Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 23, 2013) Henry Bowers on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 23, 2013) Subscribe to IEET News ListsDaily News FeedLongevity Dividend ListCatastrophic Risks ListBiopolitics of Popular Culture ListTechnoprogressive ListTrans-Spirit List
Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv
|
|
|

I’m my graduate studies I’ve been reading and thinking a lot about how something in the world becomes meaningful, how does one arrangement of matter become a symbol and another does not? I’ve been taking a developmental psych perspective on such matters, and with Solipsism (the belief that I am the only one who is real and conscious, and everything and everyone else is a construction of my mind) in the back of my mind I’ve come to the opinion that its the shared social experience we have in the world that allows communication. Without an embodied overlap of experience symbols and communication are not possible.
So the question is whether we could live with dolphins with enough overlap to form shared meanings, and therefore communicate. Of course this also depends on the ability to perceive the communicative acts of one and other (body language, sounds, the development of a third language equally accessible to both?).
Without the shared experience of the world we can only find syntax and not semantics.