Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies


The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Rituals Improve Life According to Ancient Chinese Philosophers

The Future of PR in Emotionally Intelligent Technology

Optimize Brain Health by Balancing Social Life with Downtime

Les membres bioniques seront-ils un jour à la mode ?

Multitasking Is a Myth, and to Attempt It Comes at a Neurobiological Cost

Faithfulness—The Key to Living in the Zone


ieet books

Philosophical Ethics: Theory and Practice
Author
John G Messerly


comments

almostvoid on 'Optimize Brain Health by Balancing Social Life with Downtime' (May 23, 2016)

instamatic on 'Faithfulness--The Key to Living in the Zone' (May 22, 2016)

R Wordsworth Holt on 'These Are the Most Serious Catastrophic Threats Faced by Humanity' (May 22, 2016)

Giulio Prisco on 'Faithfulness--The Key to Living in the Zone' (May 22, 2016)

Giulio Prisco on 'Faithfulness--The Key to Living in the Zone' (May 22, 2016)

spud100 on 'Guaranteed Mirage Income?' (May 22, 2016)

John G Mess on 'Ethicists Generally Agree: The Pro-Life Arguments Are Worthless' (May 21, 2016)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Ethicists Generally Agree: The Pro-Life Arguments Are Worthless
May 17, 2016
(4042) Hits
(10) Comments

Artificial Intelligence in the UK: Risks and Rewards
May 12, 2016
(3219) Hits
(0) Comments

Nicotine Gum for Depression and Anxiety
May 5, 2016
(2977) Hits
(0) Comments

3D Virtual Reality Is the Best Storytelling Technology We’ve Ever Had
May 5, 2016
(2807) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Security > Rights > Economic > Life > Access > Affiliate Scholar > Richard Eskow

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3171) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Increasing Social Security Benefits: An Idea Whose Time Has Come


Richard Eskow
By Richard Eskow
huffingtonpost.com

Posted: Feb 19, 2013

Archaeologists of the future will sift through our newspapers, websites, and other ephemera and marvel at the inverted shape of our political debate.

They'll be particularly surprised to discover that, at a time when retirement security was being destroyed for an entire generation, politicians were posturing over how to make the problem even worse by cutting Social Security.

And they'll marvel over how long it took us to agree on the right solution: Increasing Social Security benefits instead.

The concept of increasing Social Security has been around for a while. Strengthen Social Security, a coalition of 320 groups, reviewed the program's ability to meet current and future needs and concluded that benefits should be increased rather than cut. The National Academy for Social Insurance proposed increasing benefits for vulnerable groups. The AFL-CIO has called for raising benefits. We got in the game, too, suggesting that a 15 percent increase in 2011 be included as part of a forward-thinking progressive agenda. (That earned us our only Rush Limbaugh rant so far -- that was fun).

Now the idea may be re-entering the national id, beginning on the left. In a USA Today op-ed, economist and influential blogger Duncan Black (Atrios) proposed a 20 percent increase in benefits. So did Joan McCarter at the widely-read Daily Kos site.

But it's not really a "left" position. As a recent survey from the National Academy for Social Insurance revealed, strong majorities of independents and Republicans think the idea has merit. In fact, pretty much everybody agrees -- except the parties who are talking about making a "Grand Bargain": Republican leaders who are out of step with their own rank and file, and the president and some other Democratic power players (who are really out of step with their rank and file).

Click Here to read more...


Richard Eskow, an Affiliate Scholar of the IEET and Senior Fellow with the Campaign for America's Future, is CEO of Health Knowledge Systems (HKS) in Los Angeles.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3172) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Yes indeed! Raising the state welfare payments above the poverty level can only help stimulate spending, consumerism and assist market forces/recovery, economic and innovation growth? However, economies still need to be reconciled? What good is giving folks welfare monies if they are spending them abroad? The “hole in the bucket” scenario?

Only yesterday our un-inspiring leader of UK Labour opposition party, (socialist), visited Sweden and praised their social values in supporting the unemployed there with 80% of their normal income. When quizzed that this ethic is supported by 50% rate income tax and did he agree? He spluttered and said, well no. But he thought Sweden’s opportunity for careers training was excellent?

Another way to ease hardship and suffering is to relinquish burdens of social debt?

debtjubilee.org

Strikedebt.org





And, of course, there is always the interesting issue of the decline of work. We are simply automating ourselves out of employment. Which means that state welfare payments, like it or not, is the future of us all. Admittedly, that’s a bit cliched among the sort of readers who frequent Ieet.org, but there is some truth in it, isn’t there?





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Teaching Critical Thinking

Previous entry: Brain Implants: to thought-talk, control machines, enhance memory

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @ ieet.org