IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


Emergence - IEET News for May 15, 2008

Bionic Athletes stepping out of the debate and in to action

The Singularity is not what you think

Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass

Is life a gift?

Recent Comments


JANUSZ CZOCH on 'Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass' (2008 05 14)


Michael Bone on 'Is life a gift?' (2008 05 14)


PhotoFan on 'Longevity Dividend Seminar Talks' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'And the Disabled Shall Inherit the Earth' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'Organization and Information at the Bedside (dissertation)' (2008 05 14)


IEET Fora


Thoughtsurfer: Trans movies poll (1)



"Poor human nature, what horrible crimes have been committed in thy name!"
--Emma Goldman



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Life > Innovation

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Knowledge Politics and Converging Technologies


Posted: May 6, 2008

6-7 May 2008, Brussels, Belgium

Sponsored by the European Union

http://www.converging-technologies.org/events.html

Knowledge politics delineates the field of activities designed and implemented for the purpose of monitoring, regulating or even controlling the production and application of new knowledge gained through science and technology. Such activities are not new but have gained importance in the course of the 1990s with the rise of biotechnology and life sciences more generally. In view of its promise to enhance human performance through even greater interventions in the body, mind, and environment, converging technologies promises to become another virulent field of knowledge politics.

Knowledge politics with respect to converging technologies is evidently one of those fields that is difficult to engage in – even as a researcher – without becoming enthralled in normative argumentation. The argument in favour of knowledge politics is that contemporary (and future) knowledge is intrinsically different from knowledge of earlier times because it will enable us to manipulate not only the human and built environment but also ourselves and fellow human beings. Therefore, new knowledge entails a potential for physical and social engineering that can be neither dismissed nor relayed to ad-hoc regulatory procedures, but rather calls for the development of new processes and tools. Those arguing against knowledge politics point to the latter’s inextricable tendency towards the policing of science and research, thus threatening to arrest progress, discovery and learning. At the symbolic level, knowledge politics represents the modern version of an existentialist quest for the meaning of life. As a social fact, it represents the contemporary edition of the conflict about the role, extent and scope of social regulation.

The aim of this workshop is twofold: to reflect on the meaning and implications of knowledge politics in general; and to draw out theoretical conclusions about how knowledge politics in the field of life sciences and converging technologies can be expected to impact on science and research, on the one hand, and on democratic deliberative institutional practices, on the other hand. Some of the thematic areas to be explored are:

Forms of governance and regulation for converging technologies (principles of governance; regulatory frameworks; deliberative processes)

Social and political contexts of knowledge politics (social, economic and political conditions; anticipatory governance; scope of influence; ethical considerations)

Science, industry and political interfaces (knowledge transfer; public-private ventures; economic infrastructure)

Practicing knowledge politics (risk assessment of converging technologies; the role of expert committees; engaging civil society; democratizing science)

Theoretical papers and papers based on empirical research are welcome from academics working in the field and practitioners from civil society, industry and public policy. Comparisons of knowledge policies and politics across scientific fields or countries are encouraged.

Submission Details:  Abstracts should be at least 500 words in length and be submitted by the 25th January, 2008 electronically at . Authors should indicate their name(s) and the title of their paper and include a short biographical note (75 words) with coordinates (institutional affiliation, telephone, fax, and e-mail). Full papers (at least 6,000 words in length) of selected participants will be due by the 15th April, 2008. Publication of the conference proceedings is foreseen.

Financial assistance for travel expenditures will be available in select cases.


permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT



HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376