Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Five Things Worth Knowing About Ebola

Birth Control? There’s an App for That

Siegel @ Science and Non-Duality

12 Technologies We Need To Stop Stalling On And Develop Now

iSchools: Contemporary Information Technology Theory Studies

SETI Institute: Risky tales: Talking with Seth Shostak at Big Picture Science


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

rms on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

instamatic on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

rms on 'Science Fiction and our Dreams of the Future' (Oct 20, 2014)

rms on 'Sousveillance and Surveillance: What kind of future do we want?' (Oct 20, 2014)

dobermanmac on 'Transhumanism and the Will to Power' (Oct 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?' (Oct 18, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?' (Oct 18, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Google’s Cold Betrayal of the Internet
Oct 10, 2014
(7466) Hits
(2) Comments

Dawkins and the “We are going to die” -Argument
Sep 25, 2014
(5644) Hits
(21) Comments

Should we abolish work?
Oct 3, 2014
(5105) Hits
(1) Comments

Will we uplift other species to sapience?
Sep 25, 2014
(4564) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Rights > Life > Enablement > Innovation > Vision > Bioculture > Fellows > Linda Glenn

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3827) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Not Just a Pretty Face:  Legal and Ethical Issues in Regenerative Nanomedicine


Linda MacDonald Glenn
By Linda MacDonald Glenn
Health Innovations in Context

Posted: Nov 10, 2010

Revolutionary regeneration techniques will inevitably be used for enhancement.

Dr. Myriam Hivon,who works with the Interdisciplinary Health Research Group (GRIS) at the University of Montreal asked myself and Professor Hank Greely of Stanford to comment on issues in regeneration and enhancement.  She notes that we humans, for centuries, have used coffee to wake us up in the morning and alcohol (not mention other substances) to alter our consciousness.  More recently, we use drugs to improve our cognitive performances, surgery to rejuvenate our physical appearance.  Embryos are selected for their sought after characteristics;  all of these interventions aim at enhancement, a quest humans have always pursued. Indeed, humans have always sought for new means to become stronger or more intelligent. 

You can read the rest here.


Linda MacDonald Glenn is fellow of the IEET, and a bioethicist, healthcare educator, lecturer, consultant and attorney. Linda also serves as a Scholar of the Women’s Bioethics Project.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (3828) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


excellent essay.





First, do no harm.

Enhancement technologies of the kind that will be available by the end of the decade, or early in the next decade will have one major advantage over the current crop. Based on current developmental trends, they will more than likely be REVERSABLE.

Stem cells are already being used for “enhancement” as a breast enlargement treatment, and with the sheer volume of “breakthroughs” occurring in the last two years, and the accelerating pace that they are happening with, it seems likely that stemcell based “nanomedical” robots are going to be developed, especially with the recent research being done in implanting electronic controls in bacteria. ( http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-03/video-computer-controlled-bacteria-assemble-minature-pyramid )

With computer controlled stemcells, and “cellvores” the emergence of a medical technology able to not only repair any form of damage done to the human body, but to reshape it at will, seems inevitable.

But, that same technology is likely to render the questions you ask in this blog somewhat less important, due to the fact that such a level of control enables reversibility. Another factor that will likely be mitigated enormously as well is cost. As stemcells are already being looked to as a negligible cost means to produce human blood for transfusions, the costs for more advanced stemcell treatments using controllable stemcells is also likely to be extremely low.

This makes it probable that medical treatments in the next decades will not only become far less complex (pre-programmed stemcells for almost any purpose available for routine medical issues, with on demand programmable ones for non-routine issues are likely to require only minimal training to use) but that costs will fall drastically, as a single culture could produce a continuous supply ( http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/68369/20101004/researchers-create-immortal-adult-stem-cells.htm )

This means that the same number of doctors which are insufficient to current needs, and which produces that “inequity” of treatment availability is going to be able to oversee those far less common cases in which a doctor is vital, while routine medical issues will become a matter that could be handled by the patient themselves. Such issues as cancer and heart disease would cease to be major illnesses with directable stemcells able to selectively repair damaged heart tissue and blood vessals, or kill cancer cells anywhere in the body.

But it also means that “cosmetic” surgeries will also become “routine”, with stem cells “surgeons” able to reshape the body in predefined ways. Properly programmed, almost any “modification” to appearance seems possible, with any such modification being reversible with the same treatments.

So, with the likely technological abilities that we will gain with controllable stemcells, the real question is will the individual be allowed to make their own choices about how they wish to look, or what enhancements they wish to have, or will they be limited in the choices they are allowed to make? Will someone with low self esteem be allowed to make themselves “beautiful”? Will those who chose to look other than “human” be prevented from changing their forms?

Cost and availability are, in my opinion, the least important questions, as cost seem likely to be low, and availability seems likely to be high, what is more important is who gets to make the choices about how such tech is used, and whether it is by personal choice.

And the answers to those questions are contingent on the answers we as a society come up with to a far wider group of problems involving individual freedoms and collective responsibilities.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Top Ten Transhumanist Movies

Previous entry: Can science shape human values?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376