Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Teaching Theories

Geoengineering: Global Salvation or Ruin?

George Grant and Transhumanism

What’s Wrong With Transhumanism?

Welcome to 2030

Natasha Vita-More @ SXSW 2010

A Long, Lonely Road

No Handlebars

Fifteen Minutes into the Future

Love’s Labour Lost: An act of desperation leads to a bad law


comments

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 15, 2010)

Dwight Jones on 'What takes the place of the nation-state?' (Mar 14, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 14, 2010)

postfuturist on 'Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?' (Mar 14, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?' (Mar 14, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Vision > CyborgBuddha > Directors > George Dvorsky > Mike LaTorra > J. Hughes

PrintEmailpermalink • (0) Comments • (19) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




George’s notes on Cyborg Buddha presentation at Convergence


Posted: Nov 16, 2008

Mike Latorra and J. Hughes presented a workshop on the themes of future mass unemployment and our need to use neurotechnologies to pursue flourishing personalities instead of psychological and cultural stasis. George took notes.

Connections being drawn:

Speculations about work, leisure, income and automation (very topical given Marshal Brain’s recent talk at Singularity Summit). Future issues include ongoing technological and cultural globalization, along with the impact of robotics and expert systems and the potential for structural unemployment.

We have to plan for radical economic dislocation and take this scenario seriously. We need to have a renegotiation about leisure and work.

Couple of ways to deal with this:

  1. We could go on permanent vacation—but many of us have defined our lives according to our labor. Hughes says this is a recent phenomenon.
  2. Redistribution of unemployment—e.g. change career paths, distribute work, etc.

Another proposal is a basic income guarantee, ensuring that every citizen has a certain kind of income. A proto version of this has been established in Brazil. Establishing a social safety net.

The cyborg Buddha part of this: to ensure that the life of leisure will lead people to a life of social and psychological flourishing, rather than the opposite. We will have a great wealth of time (an unprecedented opportunity), the question is what to do with it. Society should encourage people to use this time to work on individual growth.

Future technologies will allow people to descend into a dystopian horror. The challenge will be to convince people not to choose this path. The pending range of bliss states is not enlightenment. What we’re living in now is a kind of virtual reality, it’s not the truth—and we need to see things the way they really are. Bliss states are a part of this virtual reality.

LaTorra argued that modern demands for material goods have prevented many from pursuing a more spiritual path. If economic pressure were off, people would be given the opportunity to spend more time and be less fearful of following the Buddhist path.

The Cyborg Buddha project is about laying the groundwork and helping people along the right path. Of importance is to help people deal with new technologies.

Blissing out: no growth, no stasis, no inner personal or spiritual life. It’s a trap.

Today we have the opportunity to create a society in which people can pursue a more rigorous spiritual life, including more time to meditate.

Future society will allow more people to use this leisure time and not be dependent on others.

Neurotechnologies will also dissipate our sense of an autonomous, single self—a notion that jives very well with Buddhist beliefs.

Is it unBuddhist to want to live forever, a form of attachment? Hughes says it’s okay to have the opinion that you want to keep on living.


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Hughes Praises Art Caplan in Discover Magazine

Previous entry: Convergence08: Opening panel on AI

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376