IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


Emergence - IEET News for May 15, 2008

Bionic Athletes stepping out of the debate and in to action

The Singularity is not what you think

Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass

Is life a gift?

Recent Comments


JANUSZ CZOCH on 'Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass' (2008 05 14)


Michael Bone on 'Is life a gift?' (2008 05 14)


PhotoFan on 'Longevity Dividend Seminar Talks' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'And the Disabled Shall Inherit the Earth' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'Organization and Information at the Bedside (dissertation)' (2008 05 14)


IEET Fora


Thoughtsurfer: Trans movies poll (1)



"Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future."
John F. Kennedy



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Vision > Virtuality > Fellows > Jamais Cascio

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Jamais on Metaversal Singularity



Jamais Cascio

IT Conversations


Posted: Apr 7, 2008

“Jamais Cascio, a futurist writer, gives four possible scenarios for how the increasing integration of technology into our lives will unfold. These scenarios are the the combination of values on two variables: whether technology is used to augment or simulate reality, and whether it is externally focused or looking inside a person. These scenarios are not inherently good or bad but will be shaped by the process used to create them.

Since all technology is a product of its creators, even the first intelligent machines will be biased toward the interests and beliefs of those who make it. For a globally significant event like the Singularity, we need to be sure that the process that leads to it includes input from all of the stakeholders that will be affected by it. These diverse interests can’t be slapped on at the end, but rather need to be brought in early in the process. Democracy is messy, but participation is more important than efficiency.

As part of his recommendation that we should be working as hard on global inclusion as on the creation of an artificial general intelligence, Jamais makes a few recommendations. All development should be based on trust, honesty, and transparency. Controls should be in place on access to personal information. And lastly, open access to information makes the risks associated with all of these scenarios more manageable. The interference of the many is better than the secrecy of the few.”


Listen/View


permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Why not do it all?

Previous entry: Discussion Forums, Commenting and Collaborative Thinktankery

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376