About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Goertzel on “OpenCog Prime: Design for an Open-Source Thinking Machine”

The Hate Party

9th World Congress of Bioethics

Emergence - IEET News for Sept 2, 2008

Dvorsky on “Should science shape the modern athlete?”

comments

Steven Earl Salmony on 'Making the Visible Invisible' (2008 09 06)

Magne Karlsen on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 06)

Lori on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 05)

Josh on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 09 04)

Will on 'Poll: Who will the next US President be? (Obama)' (2008 09 04)




ieet forums

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (2)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)

Jimmy_Adams: Intergenerational Behaviours (1)



"If we did all the things we are capable of doing, we would literally astonish ourselves."
Thomas A. Edison, 1847-1931 American Inventor





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Life > Innovation

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Kinsley on “Why Science Can’t Save the GOP”

Time



Posted: Nov 29, 2007

Michael Kinsley has Parkinsons disease, and he’s not letting the GOP get away with undeserved triumphalism about the alleged trumping of embryonic stem cell research by somatic tissue engineering:

the position a politician takes on an issue tells you something about his or her character, values and intellect. And that understanding doesn’t disappear even if the issue itself does. Over the past six years, Bush and most Republicans in Congress have done their best to stop medical research that could cure many diseases, including one that I have. They claimed that morality and ethics required no less, yet they demonstrated by their indifference toward in vitro fertilization that they couldn’t possibly be serious about this. Now they hope that science will spring them from the trap they walked into with full knowledge. Bush Administration apologists even say the President deserves credit because he directed research away from embryonic stem cells and encouraged scientists to look for more acceptable alternatives. In fact, the new research would not have been possible without the kind involving embryonic stem cells, which Bush believes is immoral.

The stem-cell issue is going away? ‘Fraid not.

Link


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Patenting Sirtuin drugs?

Previous entry: Giulio Prisco's Defense of Superlativity

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376