Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe to: Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Blog feeds Twitter IEET Wiki



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

How I help transgender teens become who they want to be

Science and Democracy

National Geographic Investigates the Future of Food

Lucy Movie (2014)

War Is Good for Us, Dumb New Book Claims

Will sex workers be replaced by robots? (A Precis)


ieet books

Between Ape and Artilect: Conversations with Pioneers of AGI and Other Transformative Technologies
Author
by Ben Goertzel ed.


comments

instamatic on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 20, 2014)

rmk948 on 'War Is Good for Us, Dumb New Book Claims' (Apr 20, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 19, 2014)

rmk948 on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'War and Human Evolution' (Apr 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Technological Growth and Unemployment:  A Global Scenario Analysis

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


The Singularity Is Further Than It Appears
Mar 27, 2014
(15094) Hits
(8) Comments

Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Mar 30, 2014
(12096) Hits
(3) Comments

Quest for immortality spurs breakthroughs in human-machine merge
Apr 6, 2014
(6363) Hits
(1) Comments

Shape-shifting claytronics: wild future here by 2020, experts say
Mar 24, 2014
(5468) Hits
(2) Comments



IEET > Life > Access > Enablement > Innovation > Implants > Health > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Contributors > Maria Konovalenko

Print Email permalink (7) Comments (4132) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


I am an “Aging Fighter” Because Life is the Main Human Right, Demand and Desire


Maria Konovalenko
Maria Konovalenko
Ethical Technology

Posted: Sep 7, 2012

My name is Maria Konovalenko and I am an aging fighter. I would very much like to live forever, but most importantly I would like all the people in the world to have this opportunity.

I work for the Science for Life Extension Foundation in Moscow, Russia. It is a small private non-profit headed by Mikhail Batin. Our goal is to attract funding for research aimed at studying the fundamental mechanisms of aging and finding the ways of life extension. We are attracting around 5 million dollars a year on average, both from the government and the private sector.

I am a transhumanist. I would very much like to live forever, but most importantly I would like all the people in the world to have this opportunity. Therefore, I am spending 100% of my time on life extension projects. I graduated from Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, which is the best Physics school in Russia. My major is Molecular Biological Physics. During my 5th year at school I had a course in Gerontology and this is how I became involved with the radical life extension initiative. I have spent 9 years in the music school and I’ve been swimming competitively for about 11 years in Murmansk, my home town, which is located in the very north-west part of Russia. It is a place where we have 9 months of winter, and I really wish I were joking.

Right now I am entirely focused on transhumanism, because I believe life extension is the top priority goal.

Why did I co-start the international Longevity Party, with Ilia Stambler? Because life is the main human right, demand and desire. Trying to increase lifespan means wanting to live and be constantly healthy. In the modern developed society life expectancy depends on the state of biomedical technologies. And the state of health care is the issue of government policy. I am talking not only about the availability of modern technologies, but also about whether they are actually developed or not. This means that your life depends entirely on the budgets allocated for fighting aging and life extension. It is crucial that people in different countries demand funding the fight against aging, because the main interest of the voters is staying alive. So, the question whether you are alive or not is a political one. A party is a political tool, therefore it is essential the majority of countries have parties that place life extension on the top place in their agenda.

The idea of the Longevity Party is acting rationally in our own interest. I believe if there were 20 people in the US, who had the necessary level of intellectual resources, they could change the situation, possibly with the help of the Longevity Party. Unfortunately, there is no large-scale scientific project in the area of life extension. The task of the Longevity Party is to elucidate the super-importance of such a project to the people.

At this moment the will to live looks like a struggle of common sense against superstition and unbelievable stupidity. Idiocy is an incredibly strong enemy. You cannot just go ahead and tell people that living is good and dying is bad, because you will immediately hear in response that many “would be bored to hell to live that long” and they “don’t want to argue with nature.”

Arguments are not enough to persuade the public, we need a powerful propaganda machine. How this machine is organized is perhaps the task of the Longevity Party, or perhaps the task of an incredible genius who will become the most significant person in the history of the civilization. I don’t know such a person yet. The goals of the party include finding this leader or leaders. Defeating aging is defeating narrow-mindedness, lack of education and inertia; it requires total intellectual superiority.

I envision a global Longevity Party. A national initiative [in numerous nations] to fight for radical life extension would be enough. The US, UK, Germany, Turkey and Russia all possess the budgets for radical life extension. However, the influence of transhumanists on national governments is zero. Probably the first goal of the international alliance for significant life extension is to impact the situation in a single small country, like Denmark or Israel.  We could play on the will of small countries to be noticed. People don’t listen to logical arguments, so maybe art can help us, like Pussy Riot or Femen.

The international Longevity Party is the alliance of people with firm character. If you have decided to be involved in transhumanism professionally - welcome. Our first step? Maybe we should let 400 coffins float down the Hudson River, that’s the number of people that die each day in NYC. I know only one thing - we need to be courageous.

Forums, where mostly freaks hang out, are useless. Conversations among ourselves have given us exactly nothing. The Party is a tool of self-identification. We need to give people the opportunity to make a rational and moral choice, that is to join the Party.

So far, the response I have gotten from people about the Longevity Party is… okay. People are active and willing. There are no strong leaders, though. They are especially needed in the United States. Maybe a critical mass is lacking.

In Russia registering a political party is a rather bureaucratic procedure and is frowned upon by the government. We have submitted the application and we need to organize the founding meeting within half a year with representatives from 42 regions of the country. This is quite a significant amount of money for us. Nonetheless, we are going to give away membership cards. We will think of the hierarchy so that a person could grow within the Party and gain new knowledge.

My prediction for the future?  Will immortality be achieved? If humanity doesn’t perish, then immortality is inevitable. The only question is whether you, specifically, are going to make it. The most irrational human generation is ruling the planet now. It is missing the unique opportunity to radically extend their own lives. Undone is even a simple experiment of testing the longevity effects of pharmacological compounds in humans. This should have been done already, in the 1970s!

If this generation dies, it dies only because of its own stupidity. Because it doesn’t care about scientific research in the area of life extension. There is some research going on, but it’s pace and the amount of funding is ridiculous compared to the importance of the goal.

I believe that real technologies of rejuvenation could be created in 20 years provided there is a scientifiс megaproject on life extension. It is going to be expensive at first - several billion dollars, but after a while the price will fall down the same way it did with genome sequencing, which costs a couple thousand dollars today and will be less than a hundred dollars tomorrow. If you are less than 65 years old, then you can buy immortality with about 30 billion dollars. But you also need intelligence and will. Intelligence you need for not giving your money to frauds, and will - to not to stop half-way to eternal life.

If you are 20, you have pretty good chances to live up to 1000 years, if there’s no global catastrophe. There’s only one serious problem threatening immortality - Unfriendly Artificial Intelligence. Aside from that - people have got the whole universe ahead of them.

If you are older than 60 - you should do diagnostics of aging using numerous biomarkers, fight cancer, and be involved in cryonics.

If you are 50-60 years old - you should be involved in regenerative medicine and gene therapy, in particular, creating the “longevity viruses.”

If you are 40-50 - you should focus on therapeutic cloning, brain transplantation artificial organs, neuro-modeling.

If you are 30-40 - you should work on development of friendly Artificial Intelligence and nanotechnologies.

If you are 20-30 - do all of the above.

If you are less than 20, aging will be defeated without you. Your major risk is a global catastrophe. Work on creating the friendly AI and it’s going to solve all the problems and you will become a superhuman with capabilities that the Olympic Gods wouldn’t even dream of.

But of course, improve yourselves, study and look after your health at any age.

What do I see as the best path to Radical Life Extension?  Technology is convergent and genome manipulations are now absolute nanotechnologies. Most effective is stimulating our own reparative, regenerative mechanisms. We need to urgently bring the diagnostics of age-related changes, i.e. aging, to the clinic. We need to learn how to restore functioning of the damaged spine using stem cells and transplant brains in primates. We need to learn how to clone a human. We need to carry out the Human Epigenome Project.

(I mentioned cloning, hence a few words about bioethics.)

We need to make it clear to everyone that life extension and defeat of death is absolutely moral and righteous for humanity. Miscreants, religious zealots and unbelievable illiterates are using their rhetoric to slow down scientific progress. Progress, by definition, is the movement from bad to good. Today, we transhumanists must promote the ideals of goodness, to combat people in pulpits and media who harangue against life extension, mortifying millions of people in the name of “bioethics.” It is, quite obviously, quintessentially Ethical to save the lives of millions of people. The servants of Satan stand against us, when they try to inculcate their credulous parishes that they act out of love for them.

The incontestable leader in biotechnology is the United States. Maybe China will come up with something significant. Europe has kind of mentally surrendered in the technological race. Governments in Europe act mostly to please the middlebrows with their not-so-sophisticated values: how to eat tasty food and watch football. Europeans are forced to transform into social animals that live in autopilot mode. On the other hand, Life Extension is a creative goal. People in society have to come out their psychological comfort zone.

When we understand that aging isn’t absolutely required, Death becomes horrifying. The nation where a critical mass of people think like that, will be the nation that solves the problem of life extension.

What do I need to help me with my endeavor? Money. As a biophysicist, I can tell you that money is the source of life. Unfortunately, our supporters have very little money. There are almost no people in the world working on advancing transhumanism who are not thinking about where to get food, clothing and housing.

If you haven’t got many resources, spend them on self-education in the area of molecular biology, artificial Intelligence or similar things. Even if you have tons of money, you should do the same thing. Studying stimulates neurogenesis and helps you make the right decisions.

The Longevity Party needs design, movies, art, scientific research, organizational work, lobbying, advertising, websites, remote education. Even making an interactive multimedia textbook on aging costs several millions of dollars. Nonetheless, we have to act even in these hostile circumstances.

My final advice? Supporters of radical life extension should meet together often, so that new projects can originate from discussions. We have to persuade the people around us. We have to spoil each and every party with conversations about immortality and emerging technologies.


Maria Konovalenko is a molecular biophysicist and the program coordinator for the Science for Life Extension Foundation. She earned her M.Sc. degree in Molecular Biological Physics at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology.
Print Email permalink (7) Comments (4133) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Not only is it moral, but it is imperative. It is the same reason Air Force pilots have longer contracts than average, why invest 25+ years in training a human being to be intelligent, imbued with reasoning skills, and understanding of the needs of society just to have them die at 65-90?





You, Maria Konovalenko, write in a very openly idealistic and enthusiastic way, and it is refreshing.

Also kind of makes one lament that in a few years, with more experience, your writing style will probably have moved to the direction of being “politically more mature”, so as to not give easy vectors of rhetorical attack for the opposition; ways for them to make you seem naive in the eyes of their target audiences, that can be mobilised to oppose transhumanism.

Such a common evolution in writing style usually takes away from the sparkly idealism and endearing unguarded honesty that you currently radiate. Thanks for that, and get your fix of reading it while it lasts, fellow readers : )





I appreciate your passion and dedication, but this passage strikes me as wildly irresponsible:

If you are less than 20, aging will be defeated without you. Your major risk is a global catastrophe. Work on creating the friendly AI and it’s going to solve all the problems and you will become a superhuman with capabilities that the Olympic Gods wouldn’t even dream of.

The number of assumptions required for such a scenario precludes anything approaching certainty. By definition, the future remains radically open. If you’re selling faith, okay, but I’d recommend being upfront about that. I’m worried people who take your prediction at face value may be awfully disappointed in sixty or seventy years. Furthermore, expecting AI to solve all the problems and magically end politics constitutes a potentially deadly renunciation of human agency.





This issue will not be solved on the political level, before it is solved on the religious/philosophical level. I have worked out the logistics of starting local assemblies/churches in small jurisdictions where a 100 highly motivated and organized people (= 25 families) could exercise political influence over, for example, a local hospital. Once a model was developed, it could be cloned across Northern Europe and other places, where atheism is widespread. This would generate a flow of cash and activists, but about a million USD is needed as seed capitol. This would be used to develop effective marketing, legal documents for the local assemblies - allowing them to achieve tax deductible status, etc.





@ summerspeaker

I agree with you.  If fact, from doing a lot of research, there are a lot of problems with what many transhumanists predict.  I recently came across one video that summaries the issue with 2045 immortality project (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIAao3wsNeA).  If you have about 13 minutes I really recommend watching it.  I no one does, I’ll just list them here.  Just let me know.





@ summerspeaker

I would be actually glad if people were disappointed with what I said in 60 or 70 years - this means those people would still be alive. I described one possible scenario that I believe is quite realistic. Of course, this doesn’t mean there’s no risk of the humanisty being meanwhile swiped off the face of the Earth by 20 war viruses made by some bioterrorists, for example.





I guess I’ll just list some of the issues for those who are interested.

For starters, fully functioning robotic avatars by the year 2020 is unrealistic because we’ve been at robotics for a long time and have made fairly little progress in terms of making human-like robots.  This is because the human body is composed of many parts and signaling mechanisms. Even the simplest of actions are very difficult to replicate fluidly in robots (let alone all of the functions combined).  Its within the realm of possibility but not within eight years and it would be incredibly expensive to build one for each member of the populace.

Another issue is that in spite of Moore’s law, we have no real theory of intelligence which hinders the creation of artificial intelligence.  Its also inaccurate to compare a human mind with a computer because computers are built in a way that if you remove one bit the whole thing pretty much falls apart wheres as if you hit the hit someones head they might get messed up but the brain would still function because the brain is vary plastic and malleable.

Another problem is that Ray kurzweil was actually misquoted.  The people of the 2045 immortality project said Ray predicted that by the 2040s we would have robotic organs in our bodies when he actually said we would have nano machines inside our bodies curing diseases, slowing the aging process etc.  Its actually kind of contradictory to the robot body idea.  The video I linked explains more.






YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: How to Stop Robots From Killing Us

Previous entry: Turning off, Turning On (Science Fiction)

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376