Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Transhumanism: The Robot Human: A Self-Generating Ecosystem

Indefinite Life Extension and Broader World Health Collaborations (Part II)

Indefinite Life Extension and Broader World Health Collaborations (Part I)

The Transhumanist Future of Sex (Crimes?)

Is The Ebola Crisis (in the US) As Severe As The Media is Making It Out To Be?

5 Reasons Why Democrats Should Push Social Security Expansion – Now


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

cacarr on 'Book review: Nick Bostrom's "Superintelligence"' (Oct 24, 2014)

jasoncstone on 'Ray Kurzweil, Google's Director Of Engineering, Wants To Bring The Dead Back To Life' (Oct 22, 2014)

pacificmaelstrom on 'Why “Why Transhumanism Won’t Work” Won’t Work' (Oct 21, 2014)

rms on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

instamatic on 'Smut in Jesusland: Why Bible Belt States are the Biggest Consumers of Online Porn' (Oct 21, 2014)

rms on 'Science Fiction and our Dreams of the Future' (Oct 20, 2014)

rms on 'Sousveillance and Surveillance: What kind of future do we want?' (Oct 20, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Google’s Cold Betrayal of the Internet
Oct 10, 2014
(7490) Hits
(2) Comments

Dawkins and the “We are going to die” -Argument
Sep 25, 2014
(5678) Hits
(21) Comments

Should we abolish work?
Oct 3, 2014
(5125) Hits
(1) Comments

Will we uplift other species to sapience?
Sep 25, 2014
(4575) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Rights > Life > Health > Affiliate Scholar > Andrea Kuszewski

Print Email permalink (5) Comments (17231) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


The Neurological Orgasm


Andrea Kuszewski
By Andrea Kuszewski
The Rogue Neuron

Posted: Aug 28, 2010

When we last spoke about sex, we discussed the neurotransmitters involved in pleasure and attraction, namely dopamine and oxytocin. Now let’s look a little deeper into the action of those neurotransmitters and how we can manipulate their action - to extend the neurological orgasm for as long as possible.

The dopamine-oxytocin response does not follow an “all or nothing” rule. Some stimuli will invoke a huge, quick response, and others a smaller, yet longer, extended response. There is a varying degree of neurotransmitter release depending on the strength of the stimulus, as well as how long we are in the presence of it. Remember last time - I told you that the longer you interface with a stimulus, or the more time you spend interacting with it, the greater attachment you will form to it.

Some studies have looked at the different types of sex and the variable neurochemical responses based on the type of sex the person is engaging in. However, it is probably not the case that the penis causes more dopamine to be released than a vibrator, for example. More likely, it is the state of mind the person is in that really has an effect on the amount of pleasure he or she is experiencing.

The cognitive state of the brain at any given moment in time is what causes the release of dopamine, whether it is prompted by a physical or a mental stimulus. Can the brain be stimulated via tactile nerve pathways to release large amounts of dopamine? Sure. However, consider this: You can give one person two separate, yet identical patterns of physiological stimulation, and end up getting radically different subjective experiences as a result. This implies that it is not just the physical act of sex that gives us so much pleasure, but how we represent that act in our mind that really has impact.

Not only can we get just as much of a neurotransmitter response from visual input or representational input (fantasies) as we can from physical input, but sometimes it can be even better than the real thing. The key to inducing that type of neurotransmitter response is the strength of the stimulus. When I say “strength” I don’t necessarily mean a strong, direct stimulus, like a nude photo, for example. Yes, a nude photo will probably get you a huge dopamine spike. But it is relatively short-lived, like a quick orgasm. We can do better.

There are ways to trigger a dopamine response that may not be as high initially, but it lasts longer, thus giving you more time to interface with the stimulus, feeling that release of oxytocin as well- and making it extend for as long as possible. Why would we want to do this? To get hooked on a feeling, of course! *cue Blue Swede* Plus… we just enjoy it longer. More time spent happy = good.

So if you want to have the most prolonged neurological orgasm possible, how could you achieve that?

Let’s look at some examples from photography used in advertising that are designed to do exactly that - titillate and engage the viewer for as long as possible. They employ certain techniques that aid to this goal: suggestion, ambiguity, anticipation, and telling of a story.

Below are some visuals from Dolce & Gabbana, who are notorious for their controversial and sexually charged ads.

image 1

So here we have Scarlett Johansson, posing for Dolce & Gabbana, looking ravishing as ever. What is it that makes this ad so sexy and dopamine-triggering? Well, several things. First of all, she is positioned in a bed, lying down, which makes us think of sex (through learned associations). Easy enough. She also has tousled hair and appears that she has just engaged in sexual activity of some kind - brilliant.

What they did was prompt the viewer to engage in a fantasy involving Scarlett - they put all the right elements there to start the story - in a bed, wearing lingerie, pre- or post-copulation, and we fill in the rest. We are brought into the fantasy state, imagining the sexual scenario, and we feel the rush of dopamine and oxytocin. Now we are spending more time thinking about what she was doing, who it was with, possibly inserting ourselves in the fantasy.

image 2

Here is another great ad that has oh, so many genius design and psychological elements going on. The couple seen here is in a romantic embrace, just about to kiss. The fact that they are about to kiss (and haven’t yet) is pretty important. We are completing that sexual scenario in our mind, filling in the blanks, lingering on the subject matter. We are spending more time thinking about the subjects, feeling what they are feeling.

The longer foreplay of images prolongs the release of dopamine and oxytocin, and basically creates an extended orgasm in your brain. A blatant sexual image induces a large, quick shot of dopamine, but anticipation and suggestion of sensuality produces a much longer pleasure response. We don’t want the image to do all the work for us; we want to travel down that road in our mind ourselves so we can enjoy the ride.

Why is ambiguity so arousing?

Mystery triggers dopamine. When it comes to sexual innuendo, people want to be brought up to the line as close as possible, without crossing the line. The “line” is actually the point at which it is obvious to the viewer where you are leading them (to imagine sexual activity), but you don’t bring them too far, so that they miss out on the pleasure of the experience.

People also generally like feeling in control. If you give enough suggestion - without going too far, which can be a turn-off - you allow them to have the illusion that they are choosing their mental path, when in reality, you are leading them there on a leash. We physiologically and mentally like the path of sexual innuendo, we want to be on that path. Yet we want to feel like we are there of our own volition.

Our brain will see ambiguous images, for example, in the D & G ads - partially clothed woman, with messy hair and parted lips. These are all images that cue sex in our brain, because we know that those elements are logical precursors to sex. When our brain picks up these cues and recognizes the “sex schema”, it fills in the gaps and continues to play out that schema in our mind, living that moment chemically as well. We don’t have to be living the moment physically to experience these chemical benefits; visualization - if intense enough - can do this, which is why fantasies are so sexually powerful.

Beginnings and Endings - Telling the Story

When we see an image in a sequence, we are automatically inclined to finish the sequence. Just like the nature of forward momentum is to complete a step that we begin taking, so are we mentally driven to complete a story that has been started. When a sexual scene is pictured at a mid-point of activity, we are compelled to finish out the play, to take the elements to their logical conclusion.

The same phenomenon occurs when we are shown a series of images with gaps in the story. Film makers and video directors are masters at this. For example, in Lady Gaga’s video, “Alejandro” (particularly at ~2:50 and beyond), never at any point are we shown actual sexual penetration of any kind. We are shown flashes of scenes, with just enough suggestion to let us know what is going on, but enough ambiguity to allow for our brain to spend time on it, filling in the blanks. By doing this, we are brought into the story - no longer just bystanders merely watching, but active participants in the sexual scene, filling in the details to our own specification, which makes it all the more powerful.

So what are the take-home points? Imagery and suggestion that is blatant and forceful may get a big spike in dopamine, but it will be short-lived. This isn’t giving you enough time to feel the attachment effects of oxytocin to the fullest extent possible. The element of mystery is a trigger for dopamine - in figuring out that mystery, we are intrigued, drawn in, motivated to examine it closer. If a stimulus is more abstract and leaves a little to the imagination, you will spend more time on it, thus extending every pleasurable neurochemical process, giving you a prolonged neurological orgasm.

Bottom line? A little mystery is a good thing. Trust me - you’ll enjoy it more.


Andrea Kuszewski, an Affiliate Scholar of the IEET, lives in San Francisco and works as a researcher and manager with VORTEX Research Group. She investigates the neurocognitive factors behind human behavior.
Print Email permalink (5) Comments (17232) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


“The element of mystery is a trigger for dopamine — in figuring out that mystery, we are intrigued, drawn in, motivated to examine it closer. If a stimulus is more abstract and leaves a little to the imagination, you will spend more time on it, thus extending every pleasurable neurochemical process, giving you a prolonged neurological orgasm.”

Is this why the Mona Lisa is so sexy?





The Lady Gaga video is blocked by UMG.





What is it about SSRI’s that prevents orgasm?  (I know—it can also prevent libido, arousal, ability to engorge, and can cause genital anesthesia, and other intercourse-related problems, but my question is why does extra serotonin in your system eliminate people’s ability to have an orgasm?  What else might it be doing in addition to increasing the serotonin in neurons?  (See SSRIsex@ yahoo.com for examples.)  And I might as well also ask, why does it not do that in other people?  I took Effexor and Wellbutrin for 13 years.  The Effexor didn’t dampen my sexuality. I recently tapered off it but am still on Wellbutrin.  Effexor is an SNRI (inhibits re-uptake of serotinin and norepinephrine) and Wellbutrin is a NDRI (inhibits re-uptake of norepinephrine and dopamine.  Wellbutrin is sexually stimulating in some people and you can see why—extra norepineprine and dopamine running around in your blood.  Some people who do fine on SSRI’s don’t have sexual dysfunction until after they quit taking it.  We all want this to stop being a mystery, and specifically I want to know what neurotransmitter or hormone triggers the orgasm.  I have a (male) friend who has libido, arousal, and engorgement, but can’t have an orgasm.  He takes Prozac.  Before the Prozac he was a stallion.





Isn’t oxytocin one of the hormones that causes the refractory period?  Not a stimulator?





Excellent article, although when I went and looked up the Gaga video (your link is blocked), all I could think was, “Is this a mashup of ‘Las Isla Bonita’ and Madonna’s Sex book?  How long until Gaga plays a sanitized version of a historical female in a musical and then goes on to adopt from the third world and marry some UK director?”  Weird Al’s parody of her makes more and more sense every day…

There’s also another difference between the two photos: how relatively dynamic they are.  Both suggest motion, but the first is minimal, while the second, by virtue of the extended view of the tangled limbs, suggests much more.  The first is sliding, the second is writhing.  The first has a lot of relaxed muscles; the second has many flexed or tense ones.  So while you’re right on target with the different element of when we’re involved in the story within the photo, there surely must be even more to a physiological response of more action versus less.  The Gaga video’s edits throw motion together in a heart-thumping manner as well, keeping the viewer’s eyes glued so their own body is still while they’re internally experiencing all of that motion on some level.

Maybe that’s why I find the first photo fairly dull while the second one is quite appealing…that is, it was appealing until I noted the way his hand is on her jaw, and that crossed the line of my preferences into looking too rough, too demanding, too controlling, too aggressive.  As soon as I noticed his hand on her face like that, I winced and turned away.  Then the previously attractive tangled limbs looked entirely less attractive, the tense muscles started to appear more confrontational, and I saw the photo in a whole new unpleasant light.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: New Issue of JET Now Available

Previous entry: There’s More to Singularity Studies Than Kurzweil

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376