Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe to: Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Blog feeds Twitter IEET Wiki



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

How I help transgender teens become who they want to be

Science and Democracy

National Geographic Investigates the Future of Food

Lucy Movie (2014)

War Is Good for Us, Dumb New Book Claims

Will sex workers be replaced by robots? (A Precis)


ieet books

Between Ape and Artilect: Conversations with Pioneers of AGI and Other Transformative Technologies
Author
by Ben Goertzel ed.


comments

Peter Wicks on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 19, 2014)

rmk948 on 'Is the US an Oligarchy? Not So Fast.' (Apr 19, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'War and Human Evolution' (Apr 19, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'War and Human Evolution' (Apr 19, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Social Futurist revolution & the Zero State' (Apr 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Technological Growth and Unemployment:  A Global Scenario Analysis

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


The Singularity Is Further Than It Appears
Mar 27, 2014
(15023) Hits
(8) Comments

Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Mar 30, 2014
(12068) Hits
(3) Comments

Quest for immortality spurs breakthroughs in human-machine merge
Apr 6, 2014
(6324) Hits
(1) Comments

Shape-shifting claytronics: wild future here by 2020, experts say
Mar 24, 2014
(5454) Hits
(2) Comments



IEET > Rights > Disability > Life > Access > Enablement > Innovation > Implants > Health > Vision > Futurism > Fellows > Andy Miah

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (8237) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Oscar Pistorius makes a ‘One Games’ Future more Likely


Andy Miah
Andy Miah
M Blogs

Posted: Jul 15, 2012

Oscar Pistorius has made history by becoming the first athlete with a prosthetic device to take part in the Olympic Games.  What does this mean for the future of sport and society? Will Olympics and Paralympics soon merge?

Much of the debate has focused on whether he should be allowed to take part from the perspective of what’s fair for other athletes. Scientists have commented on whether his legs are doing something fundamentally different from biological limbs. Other critics have said it is political correctness gone mad that has led to him being allowed within the Olympic programme.

Each of these perspectives fails to see the bigger picture and the fact that the separation between Olympic and Paralympic athletes is an historical accident born out of a time with very different values and a failure to recognize the accomplishments of disabled people.

If the modern Olympic Games were invented today, there would be just one Games. No advanced democracy would accept the segregation that presently exists.

In part, this is why Pistorius is controversial. He is an outlier in the Paralympic community, unrivaled in his achievements and aspirations. Yet his values are more in keeping with the direction of Paralympic sport. While the Paralympic Games may have begun as a social movement, the mission of which was partly to promote the capabilities of people with disabilities, it is today an elite athletic population, held to the same standards of so-called able-bodied athletes.

Recently, the CEO of the IPC, Philip Craven, indicated that it was not inconceivable that the two Games become one at some point in the future and this speaks volumes to how the tables are turning.

Today’s Olympic gold medal winner may be tomorrow’s Paralympian, as the rise of technological enhancements means that prosthetics can overtake the capacities of biological body parts and what we consider today to be optimal may, tomorrow, seem inefficient. This matters considerably in sports as so many promising athletes have their careers brought to an end by injury, a testimony to our biology’s limited capacity to withstand a career in elite sport without technological support.

What’s more, these future athletes need not be the kind of clunky prosthetic devices that resembles Pistorius’ blades. Rather, athletes – and people more generally – may have their bodies infused with nanobots that make our bodies more resistant to stress and more capable of repair and enhancement.

Yet, there is a further argument to support this direction, which is that the Olympic Games is not just about performance, it is about social change and nobody more than Pistorius represents the changes that are taking place around human enhancement technologies. He represents the dramatic changes to our concept of what it means to be able-bodied.

I suspect in 30 years from now, more people will tune in to the ‘Enhanced Olympics’ than the present-day version, not least because more people will identify with these kinds of people.


Andy Miah Ph.D. (@andymiah) is the Visions of Utopia and Dystopia fellow of the IEET, and Chair in Ethics and Emerging Technologies in the School of Creative and Cultural Industries and Director of the Creative Futures Research Centre at the University of the West of Scotland, Fellow of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, USA and Fellow at FACT, the Foundation for Art and Creative Technology, UK.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (8238) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


While we’re at it, let’s get rid of the division between male and female athletes. Now that I say that, I don’t like the idea. What would I do with so many fewer female athletes. If we’re going to talk about a ‘one games’, we might as well talk about merging the male and female games. I’m still not liking the idea of fewer female athletes.

(I tried to comment before but I didn’t see it show up so I’ll try again. Let’s hope I’m not repeating myself.)





What happens when people with intact bodies begin to use enhanced limbs simply as a means to improve performance?

How can flippers still be disallowed in swimming?

Why couldn’t a weightlifter use a mechanized exo-skeleton?

A pole vaulter with arm extensions to provide additional leverage?

The concept seems very flawed and full of contradictions.

http://www.feedbooks.com/userbook/2988





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Spacesteading – May the Meek Inhabit the Cosmos

Previous entry: Which Nation Has the Best ‘Technik’?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376