Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Why Drone Operators, Non-Combat Soldiers, and Peace Corps Volunteers Get PTSD

How To Live With Doubt About Life’s Meaning

“Robots will colonize space, without human beings”

Brett Frischmann on Reverse Turing Tests and Machine-like Humans

Wold Future 2016

Danaher Interview on Robot Overlordz Podcast about Algocracy

ieet books

Philosophical Ethics: Theory and Practice
John G Messerly


Paul Tiffany on '“Robots will colonize space, without human beings”' (Jul 23, 2016)

instamatic on 'Moral Uncertainty and Moral Enhancement' (Jul 22, 2016)

almostvoid on 'The Age of Em: 1 Year After We Upload Ourselves to The Internet' (Jul 21, 2016)

rms on 'Moral Uncertainty and Moral Enhancement' (Jul 21, 2016)

Steve Fuller on 'Beware the Rise of Gerontocracy: Some Hard Lessons for Transhumanism, Not Least from Brexit' (Jul 20, 2016)

GamerFromJump on 'Beware the Rise of Gerontocracy: Some Hard Lessons for Transhumanism, Not Least from Brexit' (Jul 19, 2016)

almostvoid on 'Beware the Rise of Gerontocracy: Some Hard Lessons for Transhumanism, Not Least from Brexit' (Jul 19, 2016)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

How VR Gaming will Wake Us Up to our Fake Worlds
Jun 28, 2016
(10465) Hits
(2) Comments

Worst case scenario – 2035 and no basic income.
Jun 29, 2016
(6904) Hits
(0) Comments

Existential Risks Are More Likely to Kill You Than Terrorism
Jul 8, 2016
(4257) Hits
(1) Comments

Transparent Smart Chargepoints and the Internet of Things
Jul 16, 2016
(3997) Hits
(1) Comments

IEET > Life > Innovation > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Contributors > Kyle Munkittrick

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (8110) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Simple Problems

Kyle Munkittrick
By Kyle Munkittrick
The Transhumanist

Posted: Mar 24, 2009

One of the great criticisms of the transhumanist movement is that it will only benefit wealthy, First World citizens and that the ones who need the most help, the impoverished and marginalized - including their children - will be forgotten. This is already a partial problem with current science and technology. Worse, some of those who try to help end up coming up with absurd solutions that aren’t really what the poorest and majority of disenfranchised need. Then again, some solutions, like Dean Kamen’s slingshot (if it actually does what he says) are exactly what is needed.

This is no new argument, everyone who’s given this serious thought knows technoscience can cause as many problems as it solves.

I’ve been reading a lot of postcolonial criticism of science recently and, well, I think transhumanists need to take a serious look at what postcolonial critics, like Harding, Spivak, and Said are saying. In particular, transhumanism wants to make people well continuously as a permanent baseline so that enhancement can occur. If we focus on technologies that can make people, particularly those whose countries and cultures lack the infrastructure and institutions to develop to do so for themselves, better at a very low cost/infrastructure requirement, then transhumanism will have a global population to work from instead of a dinky core of hyper-elite hobby augmenters. I’m libertarian and I’m saying this stuff, which is why I probably support democratic transhumanism more so than die-hard (cough, objectivist, cough) libertarian transhumanists.

For me, one of the best examples of a simple, solvable problem is that of cleft lip and palate. While a cosmetic issue, yes, it’s also clearly a health/wellness and quality of life issue. Cleft lip and palate is a huge problem in the developing world and biotechnology looks to be the best hope for a mass solution because the problem is genetically based. [Science Daily] That means it’s something we can, in fact, must solve with biotech. I think that’s what made Juan Enriquez’s TED Talk so compelling, he talks about simple, realistic solutions. And TEETH. For God’s sake can I get some new teeth? Regrowing teeth is probably the single biggest hope I have invested myself in thus far. I have one crown and a couple fillings, will probably need more, and I cannot stand going to the dentist (yet I still don’t floss, heap shame upon me). The large point here is that transhumanism’s four big techs - nano, bio, info, cogno - don’t have to be just committed to creating some sort of superhuman. Transhuman tech can be used to make things like Crohn’s disease and lupus and tinnitus and malaria non-issues.

I say this in a postcolonial context because a great number of transhuman and postmodern technologies allow for those countries that had their ‘natural historical development’ (for lack of a better term) derailed by colonialism to skip, as it were, the path of current developed countries. In short, they don’t have to industrialize. Transhuman and postmodern tech, like alt-energy, cell networks, and micro-manufacturing allow tiny, rural communities to be both self-sufficient and enjoy a high standard of living. The key here is to make these technologies available and useful but also present enough options to prevent corporate colonialism.

It always helps put the transhumanist movement in perspective by trying to imagine its usefulness to a rural, subsistence farmer or nomad. The green movement has taken the same approach, noting how while current solar tech isn’t enough to fuel our high-energy lives, one solar cell can bring significant improvement in quality of life to a rural, impoverished family. I’m not speaking for the subaltern here, just trying to start the dialog.

Kyle Munkittrick, IEET Program Director: Envisioning the Future, is a recent graduate of New York University, where he received his Master's in bioethics and critical theory.
Nicole Sallak Anderson is a Computer Science graduate from Purdue University. She developed encryption and network security software, which inspired the eHuman Trilogy—both eHuman Dawn and eHuman Deception are available at Amazon, the third installment is expected in early 2016. She is a member of the advisory board for the Lifeboat Foundation and the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (8111) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


I’m pretty sure “postcolonial criticism” doesn’t mean anything in the context you’ve provided. Could you be more specific?

I am assuming you mean to say that our identities have been structured by the history of imperialism. Yet, I am not sure how this is at all relevant to the future of technological development. This stuff can only tell us why our current world kinda sucks.

I agree about the teeth thing though.

YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: What is “Uplift?”

Previous entry: The Efficiency Paradox and Geo-Engineering


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @