Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies



Support the IEET



The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

The Scientific Method is a Scientific Idea that is Ready for Retirement

Does the Biblical God Exist? - I Think We Can Do Better

The Argument for Legalizing Psychedelics - Part 1: Cognitive Liberty and Creativity

Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck

The Long Stop (short story)

Martine Rothblatt and Bina48 interviewed by Joe Rogan


ieet books

Apex
Author
Ramez Naam


comments

ValerieTarico on 'Does the Biblical God Exist? - I Think We Can Do Better' (May 25, 2015)

Rick Searle on 'The Scientific Method is a Scientific Idea that is Ready for Retirement' (May 25, 2015)

Lincoln Cannon on 'Does the Biblical God Exist? - I Think We Can Do Better' (May 25, 2015)

Lincoln Cannon on 'The Semi-Orthogonality Thesis - examining Nick Bostrom’s ideas on intelligent purpose' (May 25, 2015)

Jessie Henshaw on 'The Scientific Method is a Scientific Idea that is Ready for Retirement' (May 25, 2015)

KevinC on 'Self-Driving Trucks Are Going to Hit Us Like a Human-Driven Truck' (May 25, 2015)

dobermanmac on 'The Semi-Orthogonality Thesis - examining Nick Bostrom’s ideas on intelligent purpose' (May 25, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


The Age of Transhumanist Politics Has Begun: Will It Change Traditional Concepts of Left and Right?
Apr 27, 2015
(9638) Hits
(5) Comments

The Scientific Method is a Scientific Idea that is Ready for Retirement
May 25, 2015
(8252) Hits
(3) Comments

We Should Consider The Future World As One Of Multi-Species Intelligence
May 20, 2015
(7116) Hits
(4) Comments

‘Let’s Kick Islam & Christianity out of Africa’ - interview with Nigerian activist Jd Otit
May 19, 2015
(6196) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Rights > Neuroethics > Life > Access > Enablement > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Staff > Kyle Munkittrick

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (5604) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Enhancers are Not “Cheating”


Kyle Munkittrick
By Kyle Munkittrick
Science Not Fiction

Posted: Mar 9, 2011

Placing a ban on cognitive-enhancing drugs won’t do anything positive, and neither will creating an attitude of disapproval.

Matt Lamkin argues here that universities shouldn’t ban cognitive-enhancing drugs like Ritalin and Adderall. Lamkin is a lawyer and, like myself, a master’s candidate in bioethics. He rightly believes that a ban would do little to promote fairness or safety among students. The rule followers would be at a disadvantage while the rule-breakers would be at a greater safety risk.

But Lamkin doesn’t believe we, as a society, should be OK with cognitive enhancement usage. Instead, he argues:

The word “cheating” has another meaning, one that has nothing to do with competition. When someone has achieved an end through improper means, we might say that person has “cheated herself” out of whatever rewards are inherent in the proper means. The use of study drugs by healthy students could corrode valuable practices that education has traditionally fostered. If, for example, students use such drugs to mitigate the consequences of procrastination, they may fail to develop mental discipline and time-management skills.

On the other hand, Ritalin might enable a student to engage more deeply in college and to more fully experience its internal goods-goods she might be denied without that assistance. The distinction suggests that a blanket policy, whether of prohibition or universal access, is unlikely to be effective.

Instead, colleges need to encourage students to engage in the practice of education rather than to seek shortcuts. Instead of ferreting out and punishing students, universities should focus on restoring a culture of deep engagement in education, rather than just competition for credentials.

drugsLamkin’s argument is that cog-enhancers are an easy way out for those in school. Struggling to study builds character and good habits. Though he disapproves of cog-enhancers, I appreciate his hesitancy to involve the law. Lamkin doesn’t believe policing cog-enhancing drug usage is necessary, but would prefer honor codes opposing cog-enhancing drugs. He believes honor codes cause one to “internalize” the value of not using the drug.

What is curious is that Lamkin doesn’t actually address what Ritalin and Adderall do for a student. As a person who has a legit prescription for Ritalin, and who knows his fair share of folks who’ve taken Adderall off-label, I believe I can speak to how cog-enhancers work in at least an anecdotal sense…

READ THE REST


Kyle Munkittrick, IEET Program Director: Envisioning the Future, is a recent graduate of New York University, where he received his Master's in bioethics and critical theory.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (5605) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Congrats on being published in Discover; that’s a big deal.
This is a good essay. You make a great case for concentration vs. motivation.
A study published in April of 2010 seemed to show that 71%of those misusing the cog drugs “screen positive for ADHD symptoms” (Peterkin, http://jad.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/04/20/1087054710365980.abstract). So, are the drugs in question for a majority of users really enhancement drugs?





Thank you for this important article.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: From Tunisia and Egypt to Wisconsin: Anonymous Hacker Group Helps Take Down Insupportable Websites

Previous entry: Ayesha Khanna Appointed as IEET Fellow

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376