Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

The End of Religion: Technology and the Future

Multifunctional fibers communicate with the brain

The Power of Pull

Yes, Obama “Won Twice” – as a Progressive. Deal With It, Everybody.

Exploring the Learning Experience Through Cognitive Science

Science, Politics & Climate Change


ieet books

How “God” Works: A Logical Inquiry on Faith
Author
Marshall Brain


comments

Lincoln Cannon on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

Knotanumber on 'Religion’s Dirty Dozen—12 Really Bad Religious Ideas That Have Made the World Worse' (Jan 23, 2015)

Knotanumber on 'Problems with Defining an Existential Risk' (Jan 23, 2015)

instamatic on 'How Religion Can Let Loose Humanity’s Most Violent Impulses' (Jan 23, 2015)

Eschaton on 'Transhumanism and Religion' (Jan 22, 2015)

Pastor_Alex on 'How Religion Can Let Loose Humanity’s Most Violent Impulses' (Jan 22, 2015)

barnyard37 on 'Are we heading for technological unemployment? An Argument' (Jan 21, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Bad luck and cancer – did the media get it wrong?
Jan 3, 2015
(18175) Hits
(4) Comments

#8: Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Dec 28, 2014
(11532) Hits
(0) Comments

#9: Creating sentient machines with ‘deep learning’ AI technology
Dec 28, 2014
(8881) Hits
(0) Comments

#6: Living for 1,000 years: an ‘out of this world’ future awaits us
Dec 30, 2014
(8463) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Rights > Disability > Life > Enablement > Innovation > Health > Staff > Kyle Munkittrick

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (5700) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Form Follows Function: Prosthetics and Artificial Organs that Break the Human Mold


Kyle Munkittrick
By Kyle Munkittrick
Science Not Fiction

Posted: Jun 21, 2011

As we are exposed to more and more prosthetics that get the job done instead of acting as awkward disguises, the more our brains flex and flow around the idea of what a human looks like.

Designers of prosthetics and artificial organs have for a long time tried to replicate the human body. From the earliest peg legs to some of the most modern robotic limbs, the prosthetic we make looks like the body part that needs replacing.

Lose a hand? Dean Kamen’s DEKA arm, aka the “Luke arm,” is a robotic prosthesis that will let you grasp an egg or open a beer. The Luke arm is a cutting edge piece of technology based on a backward idea – let’s replace the thing that went missing by replicating it with metal and motors. Whether it’s an artificial leg or a glass eye, prostheses often seek to reproduce not only the function of the body part, but the form and feel as well.
runner
There are good reasons to want to reproduce form and feel along with function. The first reason is that our original bits and pieces work quite well. The human body as a whole is a natural marvel, let alone the immense complexity and dexterity of our hands, eyes, hearts, and legs. No need to reinvent the wheel, just replicate the natural model you’ve been given.

The second, less obvious reason, is that we as a society have been and remain deeply uncomfortable with amputees and prosthetics. Many people don’t know what to do when faced with an artificial arm or leg. I wish it were different, but it largely isn’t. So prostheses are designed to look like whatever it is they replicate to hide the fact that the arm or leg or eye isn’t biological.

That methodology is being challenged by a few recent innovations: Össur’s now famous Cheetah blades, Kaylene Kau‘s tentacle arm, and the artificial heart with no heartbeat.

These new prostheses and artificial organs are a result of approaching the problem by asking “What does this piece allow us to do?” not “How do we build an artificial one?” The implications for how humans will view themselves in the coming decades are monumental.

There are three major ways in which non-standard prosthetics and artificial organs will change the way we come to understand the human form…

READ THE REST


Kyle Munkittrick, IEET Program Director: Envisioning the Future, is a recent graduate of New York University, where he received his Master's in bioethics and critical theory.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (5701) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Vacation in Libertarian Paradise

Previous entry: The Artificial Ape pt1

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376